Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where was the concern about "government spending" when no-bid contracts were awarded?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 10:36 AM
Original message
Where was the concern about "government spending" when no-bid contracts were awarded?
Consider this:
Halliburton has become the object of several controversies involving the 2003 Iraq War and the company's ties to former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney. Cheney retired from the company during the 2000 U.S. presidential election campaign with a severance package worth $36 million.<40> As of 2004, he had received $398,548 in deferred compensation from Halliburton while Vice President.<41> Cheney was chairman and CEO of Halliburton Company from 1995 to 2000 and has received stock options from Halliburton.<42>

In the run-up to the Iraq war, Halliburton was awarded a $7 billion contract for which 'unusually' only Halliburton was allowed to bid.<43>

Bunnatine Greenhouse, a civil servant with 20 years of contracting experience, had complained to Army officials on numerous occasions that Halliburton had been unlawfully receiving special treatment for work in Iraq, Kuwait and the Balkans. Criminal investigations were opened by the U.S. Justice Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Pentagon's inspector general.

In one of Greenhouse's claims, she said that military auditors caught Halliburton overcharging the Pentagon for fuel deliveries into Iraq. She also complained that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's office took control of every aspect of Halliburton's $7 billion Iraqi oil/infrastructure contract. After her testimony, Greenhouse was demoted for poor performance.<44> Greenhouse's attorney, Michael Kohn, stated in The New York Times that "she is being demoted because of her strict adherence to procurement requirements and the Army's preference to sidestep them when it suits their needs."<45>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halliburton

Now, I don't own a business and I'm not a big fan of capitalism, but I do know that the bidding process is used to bring in the lowest cost for the products and services. So where were all these "concerned about spending" Republicans when these no-bid contracts were being awarded?

GOP = "Gang Of hyPocrites
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Those are THE JOBS Reaganism/PNAC delivered for 30 years of Tax Breaks and Republicans know
that MIC, and American Exceptionalism = American employment, either as contractors or as military enlistees, because God told them so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. The army awarded KBR a no bid contract in May of last year.
Edited on Tue Jun-28-11 11:11 AM by LiberalAndProud
KBR, the Army's largest contractor in Iraq, was picked for a no-bid contract worth as much as $568 million through 2011 for military support services in Iraq, according to Army officials.

The Army announced the new work order only hours after the Justice Department said it will pursue a lawsuit accusing the Houston-based company of taking kickbacks from two subcontractors on Iraq-related work. The Army also awarded the work to KBR over objections from members of Congress, who have pushed the Pentagon to seek bids for further logistics contracts.

The Justice Department said the government will join a lawsuit filed by whistle- blowers alleging that two freight- forwarding firms gave KBR transportation department employees kickbacks in the form of meals, sports tickets and golf outings.

“Defense contractors cannot take advantage of the ongoing war effort by accepting unlawful kickbacks,” Assistant Attorney General Tony West said in a statement.


Read more: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/6992080.html#ixzz1QaRxq0Pc


There are some shady dealings going on, all under the guise of national security.

If you wonder why we're not in the business of ending wars, this might provide a clue. (From KBR's 2010 financial report.)
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9ODgyMTh8Q2hpbGRJRD0tMXxUeXBlPTM=&t=1

We won awards from NAMSA, the contracting arm of NATO, to operate Afghanistan’s two major airports, located in Kabul and Kandahar. A third, strategically important win at Bastion Airfield gave KBR a presence at all three major points of entry into this theatre of operations and a prime position for future opportunities. Following the successful construction of 8 rocket-proof facilities in Basra, Iraq, under time and under fire, the subsequent successful construction in Afghanistan for the Ministry of Defence (MOD) of two sizeable equipment support facilities reinforces KBR’s ability to deliver under any circumstances.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. ROOT IS AN OIL SUPPLY COMPANY.... PUMPS ETC
:mad: :puke: :mad: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. one must look past the rhetoric, which is obviously complete b.s.
republicans advocate for their wealthy benefactors.
they'll say whatever serves their purpose at the time.

they love deficits when they're in charge and get to pick the tax breaks and spending programs, so you don't hear boo about deficits from republicans then.

they hate deficits when they're not in charge and democrats get to pick the tax breaks and spending programs, so all you hear from republicans is how terrible deficits are.

obviously, they don't really give a crap about deficits one way or the other. it's all for show.

what they care about is gaining power, holding power, and (ab)using power to enrich those who got them power and keep them in power.



if calling them out on their hypocrisy gets them to pull back and be more consistent, then it's worth it. but at some point there's no point in it. it's NOT hypocrisy if they have no intention of being consistent in their rhetoric.

it's FRAUD, and we should call it such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anyone that understands politics know there is no concern about spending
Republicans spend money just as money as democrats when in power. Funny enough it has been democratic legislatures and presidents that have worked to have there spending paid for, while Republicans almost never do this. Even their Paul Ryan budget saver, has infact a large number of tax breaks with no way to "pay" for them and thus increases no decreases the debt. Why do people believe Republicans and politicians in general have "concern" for spending? Better yet why does the media that covers day in and day out fall for these lies over and over? The whole process is faker than WWE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC