Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Abstinence-only Sex Ed: Still a Failure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:00 AM
Original message
Abstinence-only Sex Ed: Still a Failure
Posted on: June 29, 2011 10:24 AM, by Ed Brayton

The American Foundation for AIDS Research (AMFAR) has issued a new report on abstinence-only sex education that reviews all of the studies so far and concludes that such programs are not only a waste of resources, they can actually diminish the sexual health of those who undergo such training.
A rigorous published review of 28 sexuality education programs in the United States and Canada aimed at reducing teen pregnancy and STIs (including HIV) found that none of the three abstinence-only programs that met the inclusion criteria for review demonstrated efficacy for delaying sexual debut. Furthermore, these three programs did not reduce the frequency of sex or the number of partners among those students who had ever had sex. This same review found that nine abstinence-plus programs showed efficacy in delaying sexual debut, as well as reducing the frequency of intercourse and increasing condom use once sex had been initiated.


Abstinence-plus sex ed is comprehensive sex education that teaches that abstinence is the only surefire way to prevent pregnancy and STIs, but that if you are going to have sex you should take precautions to avoid both of those things. It works far better than abstinence-only sex ed.
A federally-supported, 10-year evaluation of abstinence-only-until-marriage programs found that these programs had no impact on youth remaining abstinent, age at first intercourse, number of sexual partners, or condom use. In fact, these programs appeared to have negative effects on knowledge: abstinence-only program participants were less likely to know that condoms can lower the risk of STIs, and more likely to report that condoms never protect against HIV.


That has been the conclusion of every study I've seen on the matter. It's time we started paying attention to the evidence and eliminate funding for this terrible idea.

http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2011/06/abstinence-only_sex_ed_still_a.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dembotoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. rates right up there with evolution and global warming
truth does not matter to a republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. their denial of proper sex education is baffling
in light of their views on abortion. They want to reduce abortion in this country but then deny the very means by which is most likely to reduce unwanted pregnancies. It makes you ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. They are all about punishment
You see, a woman forced to carry an unwanted baby to term is punishment for fornication. And since they also don't want to fund child health, day care or other things that might help the baby and mother, the punishment goes on and on. That is Christian values for you! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. And Bristol Palin the movement's role model and spokeschick exemplifies the failings
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 11:52 AM by Generic Other


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC