Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember when Al Gore said he would put Social Security in a lock box? /nt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 08:51 AM
Original message
Remember when Al Gore said he would put Social Security in a lock box? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, I remember a lot
K/R for President Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. And yet Nader said that Gore was not much different than Bush*. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Totally. You could hear the laughter from the M$M yacking it up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's what I remember as well.
The snickering and denegration. Of course they did that to Al Gore, the person, as well as his proposals. I've always wondered about the dislike ALL the media had for Gore-it never made any sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillStein Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The most depressing part of that campaign
was the idea that w was the kind of guy you'd want to have a beer with, while Gore was too smart.

Too smart???? :wtf:

The last thing I want is a president who's as smart as I am. I'm nowhere near bright enough to lead this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. It was a horrible idea. We would be worse off if we had done that.
Edited on Thu Jul-07-11 09:08 AM by Recursion
He wanted to send FICA surpluses to the general fund to redeem bonds rather than purchasing them for the Trust Fund. Our debt would be lower, but SS would have no trust fund if we had done that.

It would be a great idea if Congress were not composed of sociopathic 5 year olds; as it is it would have made it much easier for Congress to gut Social Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. False choice
How the funds were segregated is not the issue, the issue is that using Social Security funds to pay for ongoing obligations was wrong. After Congress has gutted Social Security to say that there would have been an easier way is speculative. The concept of not using Social Security trust funds for everyday expenses is a sound one. As it is now, the Social Security surpluses are given to the general fund anyway.

But, like you said, Congress is composed of sociopathic 5-year olds who have spent all the money regardless of whether it was committed to Social Security or not. I thing Gore's intention was to take the Social Security trust fund away from their greedy fingers. And having a fool-proof method to keep it away from them is the problem, but the concept is still a sound one.

I don't recall the aspect of sending FICA surpluses to the general fund, but for sure that is as dangerous and no plan at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The idea was to take FICA surpluses and buy back bonds
So that the projected 500 billion or so a year would go to debt reduction. Assuming the W tax cuts & wars and resulting wage crashes hadn't happened, we'd have about 6 trillion less in debt than we do now -- but future SS outlays would be coming directly out of the general fund. As it is borrowing to pay SS outlays will be debt-neutral; that wouldn't be the case under Gore's plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Of course
I remember that everytime I hear of how the Social Security trust fund has been squandered away. When the 2000 election was stolen, who would have thought they could have cmopletely wrecked the U.S. economy in only 10 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Except the lock box would have made things worse
There would be no bonds left in the trust fund (or substantially fewer).

Borrowing would be cheaper, but SS would have to go to Congress for the new borrowing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. Gore was right... as usual...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. I still hear the peels of laughter......
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC