Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. judge unimpressed with Apple ‘App Store’ trademark claim

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 12:40 PM
Original message
U.S. judge unimpressed with Apple ‘App Store’ trademark claim
A federal judge on Wednesday denied a bid by Apple to immediately stop Amazon.com from calling its online shop for smartphone programs an "App Store."

US District Court Judge Phyllis Hamilton didn't buy Apple's argument that the phrase "App Store" was tantamount to a trademark, which it has applied for.

She ruled that Apple has not established that its "App Store" mark is famous in the sense of being "prominent" and "renowned."

"The evidence does show that Apple has spent a great deal of money on advertising and publicity, and has sold/provided/furnished a large number of apps from its App Store," Hamilton wrote in her ruling.

"However, there is also evidence that the term 'app store' is used by other companies as a descriptive term for a place to obtain software applications for mobile devices."

Regarding Apple's argument that the name "Amazon Appstore for Android" would cause confusion in the minds of consumers, the judge concluded that the phrase "App Store" was more "descriptive than it is distinctive."

<snip>

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/07/07/u-s-judge-unimpressed-with-apple-app-store-trademark-claim/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. apps is now a g eneric phrase widely used by the publics as short for applications nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, and Zucker-whats-his-face wants to trademark "face" and "book" - what an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. i think they tried to own it themselves, but others immediately started using that term
and now everyone uses it. they should have trademarked it before they used it then maybe they'd have a case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, the judge should be impressed -- to the point of being app-alled.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC