Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elizabeth Warren is one of a kind.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:06 AM
Original message
Elizabeth Warren is one of a kind.


She was a fight worth having.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's a fight she didn't want.
She'd rather fight to take back Teddy Kennedy's seat in the senate. I look forward to our new Liberal Lioness in the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. People serve at the pleasure of the president. If the president wanted
her, he could have gotten her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Why on Earth would you force someone to take a job they didn't want?
Even if you assume that you could MAKE someone work for you, which is a shitty thing to do anyway, why would you want to? There's no one else who could do the job as well who might actually want to, and who you wouldn't be forcing to ignore her home, her husband, and giving up her very hard to come by tenured job at Harvard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Do you have a credible link for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Four pages of articles in Google Search indicates enough smoke
to believe there is fire.

http://www.google.com/search?q=elizabeth+warren+senate+2012&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

There is more tea leaves regarding Warren running for Senate than anything saying Obama is cutting Medicare or SS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. She is an amazing women... Listen to this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks for posting that, midnight
She rocks. No wonder the forces of darkness hate her so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. You're looking at the first female President of the United States. She's doing the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. of all the possibilities, she is the one. Love that woman.
But I would hesitate to put her in such a presser cooker thankless job. Second day into her administration there would be crying and mewling about what a corporate whore she was because Nirvana wasn't attained fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No. When people are honest and genuinely try to do the right thing it gets recognized.
We know that she is not, and would never becoome, a corporate whore.

She could not have been successful as head of CFPB.

It would have been the

The Bad Guys: Wall St.Banksters-Wealthy Private Interests--multi-national corporations--CorporateDems-Republicans team

against

The Good Guys: Elizabeth Warren--Dem Progressive Caucus--Independent Progressives--American people team

It's a game that the Good Guys can no longer win in Washington. The deck is stacked, and those officiating the game play for the Bad Guys.

This is the Us vs. Them that exists today in America. This is crystal clear to everyone that has the ability to think objectively.

There is an old saying, "you can't fight city hall".

The appropriate replacement phrase for this saying, circa 2011, is

"You Can't Fight Wall St."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roxiejules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Another Brooksley Born moment
Congress prevents another smart woman from attempting to rein in banksters:

http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2009/marapr/features/born.html


More recently, as analysts sort out the origins of what has become the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, Born has emerged as a sort of modern-day Cassandra. Some people believe the debacle could have been averted or muted had Greenspan and others followed her advice.

Ultimately, Greenspan and the other regulators foiled Born’s efforts, and Congress took the extraordinary step of enacting legislation that prohibited her agency from taking any action. Born left government and returned to her private law practice in Washington.

Born recalls taking a phone call from Lawrence Summers, then Rubin’s top deputy at the Treasury Department, complaining about the proposal, and mentioning that he was taking heat from industry lobbyists. She was not dissuaded. “Of course, we were an independent regulatory agency,” she says.

The debate came to a head April 21, 1998. In a Treasury Department meeting of a presidential working group that included Born and the other top regulators, Greenspan and Rubin took turns attempting to change her mind. Rubin took the lead, she recalls.

“I was told by the secretary of the treasury that the CFTC had no jurisdiction, and for that reason and that reason alone, we should not go forward,” Born says. “I told him . . . that I had never heard anyone assert that we didn’t have statutory jurisdiction . . . and I would be happy to see the legal analysis he was basing his position on.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Precisely. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Good post. It's a frightening sign of just how bad things are
when someone who is so obviously good for this country was driven out by Wall St.

I agree with your assessment that it is the US V Wall St. And Wall St. is winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Hope so. She would make a really good president.
She has common sense and is well educated. That is the combination we need.

Obama pretends to be well educated, but he does not have common sense. I don't think he is good at math reasoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Yep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. The country needed her, but Wall St. didn't.
And yes, she was worth fighting for. But like Brooksley Borne, she was a threat to the deregulators and THEY fought hard to get rid of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Another reason to vote for a progressive challenger to Obama.
His treatment of Elizabeth Warren has not been fair at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I'll write she and Sanders in as an alternative
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 10:35 PM by Lorien
if a challenger doesn't present his or herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC