Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nixon, Roger Ailes and Fox news - ReTHUGS and Murdoch!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:30 AM
Original message
Nixon, Roger Ailes and Fox news - ReTHUGS and Murdoch!!!
The chickens have come home to roost
http://gawker.com/5814150/
<snip>

Republican media strategist Roger Ailes launched Fox News Channel in 1996, ostensibly as a "fair and balanced" counterpoint to what he regarded as the liberal establishment media. But according to a remarkable document buried deep within the Richard Nixon Presidential Library, the intellectual forerunner for Fox News was a nakedly partisan 1970 plot by Ailes and other Nixon aides to circumvent the "prejudices of network news" and deliver "pro-administration" stories to heartland television viewers.

The memo—called, simply enough, "A Plan For Putting the GOP on TV News"— is included in a 318-page cache of documents detailing Ailes' work for both the Nixon and George H.W. Bush administrations that we obtained from the Nixon and Bush presidential libraries. Through his firms REA Productions and Ailes Communications, Inc., Ailes served as paid consultant to both presidents in the 1970s and 1990s, offering detailed and shrewd advice ranging from what ties to wear to how to keep the pressure up on Saddam Hussein in the run-up to the first Gulf War.

Roger Ailes' Secret Nixon-Era Blueprint for Fox NewsThe documents—drawn mostly from the papers of Nixon chief of staff and felon H.R. Haldeman and Bush chief of staff John Sununu—reveal Ailes to be a tireless television producer and joyful propagandist. He was a forceful advocate for the power of television to shape the political narrative, and he reveled in the minutiae constructing political spectacles—stage-managing, for instance, the lighting of the White House Christmas tree with painstaking care. He frequently floated ideas for creating staged events and strategies for manipulating the mainstream media into favorable coverage, and used his contacts at the networks to sniff out the emergence of threatening narratives and offer advice on how to snuff them out—warning Bush, for example, to lay off the golf as war in the Middle East approached because journalists were starting to talk. There are also occasional references to dirty political tricks, as well as some positions that seem at odds with the Tea Party politics of present-day Fox News: Ailes supported government regulation of political campaign ads on television, including strict limits on spending. He also advised Nixon to address high school students, a move that caused his network to shriek about "indoctrination" when Obama did it more than 30 years later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. ironically Ailles alliance with murdoch - flipped the script
at first it seems that the point was to manipulate press coverage to favor theGOP. Somewhere along the line - the script has flipped and now it seems that the Faux media has coopted the GOP. That is the drama we are watching unfold with the depressing debt cielling ballet. Faux rules the TeaParty that has hijacked all the cynical little GOPers in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What I'm wondering, is how much blackmail is involved?
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 08:15 AM by notadmblnd
So many of our politicians have done an about face soon after taking office from the policies that they ran on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well time is catching up with all of them now
and I'm lovin' it.
I remember a Cheney interview a few years ago where he insisted that his hotel TV had to be on FOX in advance of his check in.
Cheney and Buchanan must have helped Ailes write this cynical document.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is very interesting.
I recall when the crook Spiro Agnew coined the phrase "nattering nabobs of negativism" that was actually written by William Safire. The seeds of Faux News are rooted in the disgust the Nixon administration felt for the media, which they blamed for their downfall because the media exposed them for what they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Which is why the entire Nixon gang should have been
sent to prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Nixon should have been.
Many of them were.

John N. Mitchell - former United States Attorney General and director of Nixon’s 1966 and 1972 election campaigns; faced a maximum of 30 years in prison and $42,000 in fines; on February 21, 1975, Mitchell was found guilty of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and perjury and sentenced to two and a half to eight years in prison.

H. R. Haldeman - White House chief of staff, considered the second most powerful man in the government during Nixon’s first term; faced a maximum of 25 years in prison and $16,000 in fines; in 1975, he was convicted of conspiracy and obstruction of justice and received an 18-month prison sentence.

John Ehrlichman, former assistant to Nixon in charge of domestic affairs; faced a maximum of 25 years in prison and $40,000 in fines. Ehrlichman was convicted of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, perjury and other charges; he served 18 months in prison.

Charles Colson - former White House counsel specializing in political affairs; pleaded nolo contendere on June 3, 1974 to one charge of obstruction of justice; he was sentenced to 1 to 3 years of prison and fined $5,000; Colson served seven months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. And we see that they were right, in the sense that once you own and dominate the media landscape-
you control the message and the public's perception to a huge extent.

You can even steal an election that way. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. I found this scathing 1985 article written by Mike Royko
Murdoch's Greed For U.S. Citizenship
May 15, 1985|By Mike Royko, Tribune Media Services
So, I'm a little puzzled by the matter-of-fact way that Rupert Murdoch, the international media tycoon, announced that he intends to quickly become a citizen of this country. I don't see how Murdoch qualifies. For one thing, he is not fleeing communism or any other form of tyranny. He is already a citizen of Australia, which is a very nice, freedom-loving country. He is treated with great respect in Australia because he is rich and powerful. Anybody who doesn't treat him with respect will feel bad in the morning.

Nor does he have a skill that is in short supply. By profession, Murdoch is a greedy, money-grubbing, power-seeking, status-climbing cad. Since when is that skill in short supply? Stroll along Chicago's LaSalle Street or New York's Wall Street and you'll see thousands of greedy, money-grubbing, power- seeking cads. Just read the financial pages. It's all corporate raids, greenmail, hostile takeovers, and other forms of modern-day piracy.
- snip -
To get it, he has set out to buy a chain of TV stations in some of America's major cities, creating his own network. That way, he will make even more money while tinkering with the minds of the viewers. But a sensible law stands in his way. Because of the potential of television to scramble, shrink or soften our brains, only an American citizen can own more than a minority interest in a TV station. And because of that restriction alone, Murdoch says he is going to become a citizen of this country.
- snip -
We might also consider the question of character, of which Murdoch has little. For one thing, he is a proven ingrate. His willingness to switch national loyalties establishes that. If you had more money than you could ever spend, would you consider giving up your U.S. citizenship just to add to the pile?


Found this article from the same time, too.

Murdoch to Seek U.S. Citizenship, FCC Told
May 04, 1985|KATHRYN HARRIS | Times Staff Writer

Australian publisher Rupert Murdoch told Federal Communications Commission officials Friday that he will seek U.S. citizenship to clear the way for his investment in six of the seven TV stations owned by Metromedia Inc., including KTTV-Channel 11 in Los Angeles.

Murdoch, accompanied by Metromedia Chairman John W. Kluge, met with four of the five FCC commissioners Friday to outline his plan to acquire the stations in a business venture with Denver oilman Marvin Davis, according to Commissioner James H. Quello.
- More at link




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Excellent find
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Mike Royko
was an outstanding journalist. Thank you for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Ailes plan for GOP-News goes back to the mid-1970s, but had to wait 20 years for foreign funding
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 09:02 AM by leveymg
Murdoch had to talk his backers into financing this scheme in 1996, and I, for one, would love to read that proposal.

No company can endure the costs of global expansion of the sort that Murdoch has pulled off without committed backers with very, very deep pockets. Murdoch was actually deeply in the red and struggling to stay afloat at the same time that Fox News was launched in the US - a remarkable feat: Wiki

By 1991, his Australian-based News Corp. had worked up huge debts (much from Sky TV in the UK), forcing Murdoch to sell many of the American magazine interests he had acquired in the mid-1980s.

In 1995, Murdoch's Fox Network became the object of scrutiny from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), when it was alleged that News Ltd.'s Australian base made Murdoch's ownership of Fox illegal. However, the FCC ruled in Murdoch's favor, stating that his ownership of Fox was in the best interests of the public. That same year, Murdoch announced a deal with MCI Communications to develop a major news website and magazine, The Weekly Standard. Also that year, News Corp. launched the Foxtel pay television network in Australia in partnership with Telstra.

In 1996, Murdoch decided to enter the cable news market with the Fox News Channel, a 24-hour cable news television station. Ratings studies released in the fourth quarter of 2004 showed that the network was responsible for nine of the top ten programs in the "Cable News" category at that time. Rupert Murdoch and Ted Turner (founder and former owner of CNN) are long-standing rivals.


In fact, this was at the very time that the Saudis, through Kingdom Holding Co. (KHC), were making a big play to acquire powerful western media outlets: http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=57587

Kingdom Holding Co. and NewsCorp:

Quote: http://www.kingdom.com.sa/en/IntInvs_TMT_NewsCorp.asp
Capitalising on a period of underperformance for News Corporation which began in the early 1990s, KHC directly invested $400 million in 1997 to acquire non-voting preferred shares representing approximately three percent of News Corporation's capital. This initial investment led to an additional $200 million investment in News Corporation shares in 1999 at the direct request of News Corporation's management. In 2005, the three percent interest in non-voting preferred shares was converted into a 5.5 percent interest in News Corporation's voting common stock in order to support News Corporation's management against a potential hostile bid from Liberty Media.

Of course, they also own stock in Time Warner:

Quote: http://www.kingdom.com.sa/en/IntInvs_TMT_TimeWarner.asp
KHC’s interest in Time Warner is the end result of a market purchase of a 5 percent interest in Netscape in 1997 for $145 million, followed by the subsequent sale of Netscape to AOL and the merger of AOL into Time Warner. KHC believed that Netscape had significant potential for growth in the media and entertainment sectors. The investment was KHC's initial entry into the technology field, before internet stocks became overvalued. In the first 16 months after the investment, Netscape yielded an internal rate of return of 90.6 percent per annum, with the price of Netscape shares increasing due to increasing demand for internet stocks and the announcement of AOL's bid. Additional investments were made in Time Warner shares in 2001 and 2002.

As for the idea that the Saudi royals have a lock on content, it's more likely that they can use their influence with the conservative politicians in the US, thus dictating policy matters, rather than the editorial board (assuming FauxNoise has one).

ETA: As for KHC owning a part of Disney, they actually own a portion of the EuroDisney resort, not the media division of the company.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Well Murdoch owned Newt GIngrich for starters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Thanks - We should start putting together an "acquisitions list" of US politicians
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 09:19 AM by leveymg
Gingrich is a good start. We know that many of the Repubs who came into power with him went on to become the core of Sibel Edmonds "Dirty Dozen" list of persons who were most actively resisting FBI investigation of foreign influence peddling, terrorist money-laundering, and other serious corruption. Here's that list:


http://wotisitgood4.blogspot.com/2006/07/whistleblowers...

The National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC) announced its Whistleblowers’ Dirty Dozen Campaign:

"The following members of Congress, by their action or inaction, have stood against real investigations, hearings, and legislation dealing with government whistleblowers who have exposed waste, fraud, abuse, and or criminal activities within government agencies. These representatives of the People are not only standing against whistleblowers, but against the public’s right to know, effective oversight, accountability, and ultimately against the democratic processes that underpin our society. "

The Dirty Dozen names the following Congressional culprits (in alphabetical order)

Senator Hillary Clinton
Senator Mike DeWine
Rep. David Dreier
Rep. Dennis Hastert
Senator Orrin Hatch
Rep. Peter Hoekstra
Senator Jon Kyl
Senator Joseph Lieberman
Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger
Senator Rick Santorum
Rep. James Sensenbrenner
Rep. Mark Souder

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. What a list
I'm now checking out the authors of Harper Collins books - fascinating.
Dick Armey; lots of Bushes - will have to narrow down this search

http://www.harpercollins.com/Author/Browse.aspx?letter=A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Then there's Sibel's other list: the rogue's gallery of 20 who were under FBI surveillance
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 01:09 PM by leveymg
but few if any were ever indicted or publicly held accountable for espionage or acting as agents of various foreign powers: http://www.justacitizen.com/images/Gallery%20Draft2%20for%20Web.htm ; for photo IDs, see, http://letsibeledmondsspeak.blogspot.com/2008/01/sibel-names-names-in-pictures.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Not surprised. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. MZM-Cunningham bribery -Foggo/MZM intel fabrication and the CIA blackmail scandal ties into this
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 09:43 AM by leveymg
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1529067

Original message

Cunningham Bribery - Foggo (CIA)-MZM Cases Linked to Saudi Slush Fund Scandal

Edited on Mon Aug-06-07 07:28 PM by leveymg
Evidence related to the Duke Cunningham-MZM CIA contracting scandal was heard this morning in extraordinary secrecy by a panel of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Judges in Pasedena. See, http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20070805-9999-...


The extreme secrecy is highly unusual. Veteran lawyers could not remember another time when the appeals court held a completely closed hearing.

The subjects to be discussed are transcripts and documents related to the February guilty plea of Thomas Kontogiannis, a New York developer who admitted to a single count of money laundering in the Cunningham case. Kontogiannis' checkered past includes convictions for bribery and bid-rigging, an estimated $70 million fortune, and a knack for staying out of prison.


The reason this is being kept under wraps that is Greece, like Turkey, has been buying GOP Congressmen and CIA officials . . . with Saudi money, as part of an enormous multinational arms and political influence buying scheme being operated by the Saudi Royal Family in several western countries, particularly focused on the US and UK.

Thomas Kontogiannis' motives in bribing Cunningham has long been obscure. A month ago, it finally came out that Kontogiannis' interest in the matter was arms transfers to his native Greece. According to details that have slowly trickled out of the case, the Saudis are lurking in the background of this, apparently as bankers for the deal.



Mr. Kontogiannis was acting as an agent for the Greek military, which we are now told was seeking backroom business with General Dynamics and other U.S. defense contractors. See, http://news.aol.com/story/_a/disgraced-former-us-rep-du...

The lure of Saudi money appears to be key to these bribery and intelligence scandals, which also connects to the Valerie Plame mega-scandal and falsification of Iraq WMD intelligence by San Diego-based defense contractor, MZM.

This is just another side of the same scandal that snared Dennis Hastert, Jerry Lewis, and several dozen other Republican big-wigs and ranking members of various committees, along with the CIA #2, Dusty Foggo. This appears to be part of the American tie-in to the monster scandal in the UK involving BAE, a big British (and US) defense contractor, the Saudi Royal family, and an $80 billion slush fund, Yamamah ("The Dove", rhymes with "Ya mama"), which has been buying western politicians and intelligence services since the mid-1970s.

In 1976, CIA Director George Herbert Walker Bush first entered into an illegal deal with Saudi Intelligence Chief, Prince al-Turki, to continue covert Agency operations banned by Congress in exchange for Saudi money. In 1982, he was picked as Reagan's running mate, and, using Saudi funding, went on run a series of notorious "rogue" intelligence operations out of the Office of the Vice President. See, http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...



This has been an ongoing conspiracy. Today, it also touches on the scandal surrounding the sudden firing early this year of US Attorney Carol Lam, who was forced out by AG Gonzales just two days after the arrest on February 13 of Dusty Foggo, chief lieutenant to CIA Director Porter Goss. Eight days later, Kontogiannis cut a deal with prosecutors in the Cunningham case, and was offered an unusually light sentence for his role in bribing the Congressman.

TPM Muckraker has been on-top of this story. Consider this Josh Marshall column from last March about Kontogianni and the connections which had then first emerged about MZM owner Mitchell Wade, and his partner, Brent Wilkes, have with corrupt elements of US intelligence and the Saudi Royals: http://beta.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2006_03...

03.09.06 -- 4:53PM // link

Another piece of the puzzle.

Remember Thomas Kontogiannis? He's the larger than life twice-convicted Greek-born real estate developer who is better known in Duke Cunningham's plea agreement as co-conspirator #3.

If you look through the Duke files, Kontogiannis' role was mainly as a pass through for large sums of money. Yes, he gave bribes and of course he was involved in a boat transaction with Duke. But in the Cunningham corruption club that was almost a rite of passage. Now, from the records, one of things that Kontogiannis wanted from Duke was some help trying to beat the rap (and later get a pardon for) a bid-rigging scandal back in New York. And for a long time I'd always sort of figured that Brent Wilkes and Mitchell Wade were the real players in this story, with Kontogiannis just added in for comic relief and -- as someone who controlled a mortgage company -- someone who could easily move money around.

But I'm hearing it may not be that simple. Consider this. Mitch Wade was in naval intelligence before he left to work in the fraud and public corruption sector. Brent Wilkes -- and we're going to be hearing a lot more about this -- was deep into the darker regions of the intel world. Both of their scams were the same, plying the government contracting biz deep in the classified realm where scrutiny and oversight is minimal at best.

Now you have the third player Thomas Kontogiannis (#4 was Kontogiannis' nephew. So I'll consider him an extension of his uncle.). Given the background and habits of the other two, is this guy really just a real estate developer from Long Island? Consider this passage from a piece in the San Diego Union-Tribune that I excerpted back in November ...

In a previously undisclosed link between Cunningham and Kontogiannis, the developer accompanied the congressman to Saudi Arabia last year. A Saudi-American businessman flew Cunningham to Saudi Arabia twice last year aboard a private jet. On the second trip, the jet stopped in Athens to pick up Kontogiannis, a native of Greece with businesses interests in several countries. Ziyad Abduljawad, founder and chairman of San Diego-based PLC Land Co., paid for Cunningham's two trips to Saudi Arabia, each at a cost of more than $10,000. Cunningham has described Abduljawad as an acquaintance who shares his interest in improving U.S.-Saudi relations.

SNIP

It was unclear who paid for Kontogiannis' trip.

SNIP

Just how did Kontogiannis get into the mix with Wilkes and Wade? What's Kontogiannis's real line of work?



Justin Rood fills in the answer to that last question, here: http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/000391.php



Cunningham, Felon Met With Saudi Crown Prince

By Justin Rood - April 17, 2006, 1:06 PM Over the weekend, a new profile by Copley News Service added to our understanding of former GOP Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham's "Co-conspirator #3," the mysterious Thomas Kontogiannis. Today, we can add a bit more. Recall that Kontogiannis bribed Cunningham through purchasing a yacht from the congressman -- and paying several hundred thousand dollars more than it was worth. His finance company also handled some of Cunningham's questionable mortgages. But reporters and investigators have struggled to understand what Kontogiannis was getting from Duke for all the money he spent on the lawmaker. The latest theory seems to be that Duke was introducing him to world leaders. As Copley reports:

Cunningham "introduced him to people. It was like he had a congressman on retainer," added.

The Copley story notes that he twice accompanied Cunningham to the White House, and kept a picture of himself meeting President Bush in his house. Now, TPMmuckraker has learned he apparently met the man who would shortly become king of Saudi Arabia. It's been known that Kontogiannis, a wealthy businessman and two-time felon, in 2004 accompanied Cunningham and a Saudi constituent, San Diego real estate mogul Ziyad Abduljawad, to Saudi Arabia. Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA) also went. Abduljawad paid for the trip. Until now, we haven't known much about the trip -- who the group met with, why, what they talked about. Cunningham is said to have gone in order to promote U.S.-Saudi ties, or some other such pap. Beyond that, we've had nothing. I called Calvert last week to ask him more about the trip. (He's the only one of the crew who's talking these days: Cunningham's in the pen, Abduljawad declined an interview, Tommy K's lawyer doesn't return calls.) Calvert's memory wasn't perfect, but he had some details to share. The group met with Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah -- then the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia, and now its king. Kontogiannis was at the meeting, Calvert recalled, although "he didn't say anything, as I remember," the lawmaker told me. Copley now tells us its sources say Tommy K's purpose "appeared to center on an oil business he owned in Europe." That's not much to go on. The group also met with "ministers of various government institutions within Saudi Arabia," Calvert said. He recalled Kontogiannis being present for "some" of those meetings. As for what was discussed, Calvert recalled only that a number of the ministers pressed Cunningham to help ease post-9/11 restrictions on student visas for Saudis. With Abdullah, Calvert said the discussion was "primarily social," and "trying to build a better relationship with the United States." Now a U.S. citizen, Kontogiannis is worth about $70 million, Copley reporter Joe Cantlupe tells us. He spent over $300,000 on Cunningham. "What Kontogiannis, 59, got from the relationship with Cunningham remains unclear," Cantlupe writes, but notes that the businessman visited the White House twice with the Duke. And now we know they visited the Saudi crown prince together also. Was that it? He bought Cunningham -- a well-positioned but hardly towering member of the U.S. House -- to meet world leaders?


Bottom-line: MZM-Cunningham appears to be part of the American side to the monster scandal involving multi-billion dollar kickbacks from defense contractors to the Saudi Royal family, which has been in turn buying western politicians and intelligence officials for decades.

Over the years, the Yamamah slush fund has bankrolled a series of Saudi black operations from Pakistan's nuclear program, to the BCCI rip-off, to the Iran-Contra operation, to the creation of al-Qaeda and political influence buying in the US and UK by various factions of the Royal family.

Every time the US and Britain puts together an arms deal with the Saudis, and now with third-countries such as Turkey and Greece, the overpricing and kickbacks funds a black program, often inside the US and Britain.

Mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Isn't Jean (the overzealous patriot) Schmidt's ethics investigation
linked to the Turkey matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Yes. Definitely. We can add Jean to the list.
#
'Schmidt's Got a Problem': House Ethics Panel Set to Investigate ...
www.armenianweekly.com/.../house-ethics-panel-set-to-investigate-r... - Cached
Feb 17, 2011 – 'Schmidt's Got a Problem': House Ethics Panel Set to Investigate Rep's Ties with Turkey. By: Nanore Barsoumian. “I think she's got a pretty ...

#
Mean Jean Schmidt's Ties to Turkey - Booman Tribune
www.boomantribune.com/story/2011/2/15/81625/2137 - Cached
Feb 15, 2011 – Well guess who is subject to an ethics probe for playing footsie with the government of Turkey? Jean Schmidt, that's who (from TPM)! ...
#
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. WHAT?! FOX News was a partisan organization from its inception?!
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 08:56 AM by KittyWampus
SAY IT AIN'T SO :o

I am so glad there is documentation of this. Thanks for posting this. It'll come in handy across the internets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. You know what's amazing
This story broke last month and received very little coverage from M$Greedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. You'd think they'd want to take down their competitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC