Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House GOP split into two factions on budget deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Playinghardball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 11:43 AM
Original message
House GOP split into two factions on budget deal
Source: Raw Story
By David Ferguson

According to a McClatchy report today, the members of the House GOP have split into two camps on the current budget deal, the flexible and the non-flexible.

On one side are the long-time Republican House members who see the president's current deal, which gives them 80 percent of what they want, as a win that they should take and go home happy. On the other side are newer House members, including freshmen representatives of the Tea Party, for whom the closure of tax loopholes and other revenue generating measures are anathema, who believe that to compromise would be worse than letting the deal (and by extension, the world economy) go down in flames.

Freshman Representative Allen West of Florida wants to take bold action now to slash government funding and reduce the deficit without any new taxes. He says, "I didn't come here to kick the can 10 years down the road."

Whereas long-standing members of the House like California's Dan Lungren, who first came to Congress in 1969, believe that a compromise can be reached and that Congress can still "work".

More at: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/07/17/house-gop-split-into-two-factions-on-budget-deal/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. In a related story "Water is wet"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know why Obama at least didn't try for "temporary" revenue by
raising taxes until the last war is settled. How patriotic it is to pay for wars for national security. Putting the republicans on the defensive to explain why they don't want to pay for two "necessary" wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. We have NO idea what PrezO has actually tried, behind closed doors
Edited on Sun Jul-17-11 11:54 AM by elleng
where negotiations must take place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. All he needed to do was let the Bush cuts expire. i.e. do NOTHING. Problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. That sounds like a good idea, problem is we'd have to know
how to present/sell it, and we're really bad at that. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. If I were an advisor, I'd stress "temporary" and "national security".
Republicans don't want to curtail military budgets or either of the military actions taking place. They cost money and we don't have the money. Even if cuts to SS, Medicare, and Medicaid are enacted, not enough money to "win" the "wars", which is a big deal to these guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. You're so right -- push the buttons. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Mitch is 'C Street'
Are any of the newbies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. West can't see the forest for the trees..he IS kicking the can
down the road because all he wants to do will have to be revisited because it simply won't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fuck em. Let them crash it. And may we never see a republican elected
for 500 years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC