Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As a Potential Default Approaches, Eric Cantor Is Starting to Crack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 09:39 PM
Original message
As a Potential Default Approaches, Eric Cantor Is Starting to Crack
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 09:39 PM by marmar
from Washington Monthly, via ALterNet:




As a Potential Default Approaches, Eric Cantor Is Starting to Crack


Some people don’t handle pressure well. The House Majority Leader, for example, is so stressed, he’s starting to crack.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) declared Thursday that Senate Democrats would be responsible for a national default if they defeat a House plan to raise the debt limit.

Cantor starkly laid out the options: Either the Senate passes the House debt-limit legislation or the nation will likely default.

“There are two choices left,” Cantor said. “When we send this bill over, this compromise piece of legislation, (Senate Majority Leader) Harry Reid (D-Nev.) can take that up, pass it, send it to the White House. We can avoid the potential consequences of going past Aug. 2 and get on with the business of this country, or it will be on Harry Reid to bear the consequences of economic damage, and I don’t want to see that.”


So, let’s summarize Cantor’s position here. The House is poised to vote on Speaker Boehner’s budget proposal this afternoon, and the outcome is still in doubt. According to Boehner, his far-right plan is worthwhile precisely because Democratic leaders “hate” it, and it isn’t the result of a bipartisan compromise or negotiations.

When the dust settles after the vote, if it manages to get a majority, the Boehner plan will have passed despite bipartisan opposition. .............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/641737/as_a_potential_default_approaches%2C_eric_cantor_is_starting_to_crack/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Editorial: Misinformation mars debt-ceiling battle:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2011-07-28-debt-ceiling-myths_n.htm


'Default' warnings are just a scare tactic. Many of the Republicans who oppose lifting the debt limit have dismissed as phony the administration's warnings that failing to raise the limit will force the nation to default on its debts. Freshman Rep. Joe Walsh, R-Ill., turned himself into a Tea Party hero when he put a videotape of himself on YouTube in which he says, "President Obama, quit lying!"

It's true that the Treasury Department could probably avoid missing any interest payments on the national debt by making those payments the top priority for federal spending. Even with no more borrowing authority, Treasury would continue to collect more than enough tax revenue to cover debt interest and some of the nation's other bills.

But a study by the respected Bipartisan Policy Center concluded that if the debt limit is not raised, Treasury will have to reduce federal spending by about 44%, forcing enormous, rapid cuts. It might be technically possible to keep paying bondholders in Beijing and Brussels while delaying or stopping some payments to American seniors, troops or businesses. But that wouldn't be politically sustainable for long once voters saw what was going on. There would be a default, and those who deny the inevitability are also in denial about the dire consequences, which takes us to our next myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoutherDem Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Compromise???
Just what did the Republicans compromise?
I really don't know!
Can ANYONE tell me ANYTHING which they gave up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. lol! Looks like Frank Luntz pulled an all-nighter to think up that piece of Bizarro logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC