Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will the GOP figure out BEFORE or AFTER they vote Monday the dems & President Obama WON?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:03 AM
Original message
Poll question: Will the GOP figure out BEFORE or AFTER they vote Monday the dems & President Obama WON?
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 03:10 AM by Tx4obama

Back in April 2011 President Obama released his Deficit Reduction Framework Fact Sheet.
Sunday, July 31st, the GOP agreed to a deficit ceiling increase on the condition that there will be 'cuts'
The 'cuts' agreed upon gives President Obama almost all the 'cuts' that he wanted outlined in his April 13th Framework.

A link to Obama's April Deficit Reduction Framework, and commentary regarding Obama's Deficit Reduction Framework vs. the Sunday agreement:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x729581

So, the question is: Will the GOP figure out BEFORE or AFTER they vote on Monday that President Obama and the Democrats WON?
And that they, the GOP, were hoodwinked/bamboozled?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. This isn't the April 2011 deal
Yes, Obama did punk them on that deal.

But the most he can say here is that default was avoided and a few scraps were thrown his way.

The other side won this round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Ah...
so I take it that you did not read Obama's April 13th Deficit Reduction Framework and compare it to the cuts in the Sunday agreement.
Because if you take the time to read it then you will see that President Obama got just about ALL the cuts he wanted back in April 2011.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. here - fucking EDUCATE YOURSELF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Editorial. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. And honestly editorial unlke the White House spin sheet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shining Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Don't know, haven't read it. But It is an editorial, and editorials are opinion pieces,
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 04:37 AM by guruoo
by definition.



Editorial
To Escape Chaos, a Terrible Deal
Published: July 31, 2011



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shining Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. Here's another one:
The President Surrenders

By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: July 31, 2011

"In fact, Republicans will surely be emboldened by the way Mr. Obama keeps folding in the face of their threats. He surrendered last December, extending all the Bush tax cuts; he surrendered in the spring when they threatened to shut down the government; and he has now surrendered on a grand scale to raw extortion over the debt ceiling. Maybe it’s just me, but I see a pattern here."

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/01/opinion/the-president-surrenders-on-debt-ceiling.html?_r=2&hp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Why are you posting 'editorials'? Go read Obama's April 13th Deficit Reduction Framework ...
and compare it to the Sunday agreement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Claiming that this deal is what Obama wanted all along
not only contradicts his own statements but makes him look worse for wanting such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I did NOT say that this is the 'deal' he wanted. I said ...
that the cuts in the Sunday agreement are basically the same ones that he said he wanted in his April 13th Deficit Reduction Framework proposal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. A distinction without a difference. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. Neither agreement ..
..... would be a "win". No other president has had to give up ANYTHING to get the debt ceiling passed.

It's astounding to me how anyone can find anything at all positive for Dems in this entire situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
54. yes, from the RABIDLY LIBERAL NYTimes
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
37. Good editorial. "Terrible deal..."demonstrates the effectiveness of extortion".
"Democrats won a provision drawn from automatic-cut mechanisms in previous decades that exempts low-income entitlement programs. There is no requirement that a balanced-budget amendment pass Congress. There will be no second hostage-taking on the debt ceiling in a few months, as Speaker John Boehner and his band of radicals originally demanded. Democratic negotiators decided that the automatic cut system, as bad as it is, was less of a threat to the economy than another default crisis, and many are counting on future Congresses to undo its arbitrary butchering.

Sadly, in a political environment laced with lunacy, that calculation is probably correct. Some Republicans in the House were inviting a default, hoping that an economic earthquake would shake Washington and the Obama administration beyond recognition. Democrats were right to fear the effects of a default and the impact of a new recession on all Americans.

President Obama could have been more adamant in dealing with Republicans, perhaps threatening to use constitutional powers to ignore the debt ceiling if Congress abrogated its responsibility to raise it. But this episode demonstrates the effectiveness of extortion. Reasonable people are forced to give in to those willing to endanger the national interest.

Democrats can look forward to the expiration of the Bush tax cuts next year, and will have to make the case in the 2012 elections for new lawmakers who will undo the damage."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Pee-wee Herman called. He wants his "I meant to do that" bit back.
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 03:19 AM by JVS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Facts are facts. Obama released the proposal for the cuts he wanted back in April.
So, the fact remains that the cuts that Obama wanted DID end up in the Sunday agreement.
If you think I am incorrect, then please explain with opposing 'facts'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wall Street won, the People lost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. President Obama, Super Genius ...
I like the way that rolls out ... President Obama ... Suuuuper Geeeenius!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Because finding spending cuts for the crappiest social programs
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 03:36 AM by EFerrari
of any first world country during steep unemployment and in a tottering economy is something only a genius could aspire to. I'm so impressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
39. lol
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. WOW! You think Obama WON????
Just WOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. If you read Obama's April 13th Deficit Reduction Framework ...
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 04:16 AM by Tx4obama

and compare the cuts in that document to the cuts in the Sunday agreement - Obama got almost all the cuts he wanted.
So, yes. He got what he wanted which equates to 'he won'.
Please explain why you think he didn't.


Edited to add:

Also, the debt ceiling will be raised up till February 2013.
The Teaparty did not get the BBA that they wanted.
The Teaparty will not get the default that they wanted.
Obama is getting up front cuts to the Defense Budget.
The Sunday agreement does nottouch Social Security. Medicare and Medicaid are still intact!
And the Bush tax cuts are being left untouched, meaning they WILL expire December 31, 2012!

It is a good win for the Democrats!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. No tax increase for the rich. The key Democratic demand.
Obama lost completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Bush tax cuts will expire December 31, 2012. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Unless they don't. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrDiaz Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #17
42. That's what everybody thought the last time.
Need I remind you that the Bush Tax Cuts were supposed to expire last year, guess what Obama signed them back into law.
So not only will I not blindly believe that he will just let them expire in 2012 (after the election by the way), I now refer to them as the OBAMA TAX CUTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #42
49. after the election before the inauguration.
It might happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #17
48. Like they did in 2010?
Riggghhhhhhht. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
52. The Bush Tax Cuts will be the next terrorism target.
"If you don't extend the Tax Cuts, we won't sign the deal. Period."

A child of 5 could see this by now.

Someone bring me a child of 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shining Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. Oh, FFS.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
46. May I second that? oh FFS....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divvy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. The deal passed ..... NO TAX INCREASES ..... ALL CUTS ....
Looks like you need to add another option to the poll. May I suggest:

Obama caved and fucked us all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Two things ...
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 04:27 AM by Tx4obama

1) The Bush tax cuts expire December 31, 2012
2) There is still going to be Tax Reform coming up.
The Sunday agreement is NOT the end of things to come.

Edited to add:
Also, the cuts in the Sunday agreement are basically some of the same cuts that Obama outlined in his April 13th Deficit Reduction Framework. So, he gets the agreement for the cuts now, and an agreement for Tax Reform a little bit later - it is the same results in the end that he laid out in his April Deficit Reduction plan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. About those two things... we HAD a chance to end number 1 earlier.

Why didn't that happen and what safeguards are in place to keep it from happening again?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. It didn't happen earlier because....
the GOP held the Unemployment Benefit Extension HOSTAGE.
Yes, Obama could have let the Bush tax cuts expire last year, and then there would have been a hell of a lot of unemployed people that would not have received their unemployment checks that couldn't have bought food.

The only way to ensure that the GOP stops screwing over America is to vote them all out of office in 2012!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. So no safeguard. NEITHER of those promises are "in the bag" and that's the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Please explain HOW a 'safeguard' could be put into place.
1) We do not have a majority in the House.
2) We do not have 60 democratic senators in the Senate that we need to override the GOP's obstruction.

I take the word of Obama that he will NOT extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.
If you do not then that it your business.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. It can't. Exactly. BTW why did "revenue increases" become "tax reform" anyway?

I like Krugman's observation on this because it's so in line with the President's VERY careful word choices.

You know, like how "we do not support extensions of the Bush tax cuts" became "we do not PERMANENTLY
support extensions of the Bush tax cuts" back during the last hostage crisis.

Tax reform can be revenue REDUCTION as easily as it can be revenue INCREASES.

I took the president's word LAST time. This time, he pays cash. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. Also, how can the GOP get anything done?
1) They do not have a majority in the house.
2) They do not have 60 republican senators in the Senate
3) They do not have the presidency

Yet they seem to be controlling the agenda quite nicely. Your argument would go better if you weren't indicating that Democrats are such inept politicians that they require supermajorities in both houses and the presidency to get anything done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #36
53. I will not sign a deal that doesn't include tax increases for the wealthy.
I will not sign a deal that doesn't include shared sacrifice.
I will not sign a deal that makes cuts to social programs for the poor a possibility.

Yeah. No, if you keep believing 'this time he'll stop capitulating!!11!1', then its YOU who has the problem.

You're like some fanatical fucking follower at Jonestown. "Hey, Reverend Jim gave me this glass-o-kool-aid. Now, I see that everyone around me that drank it is dead, but he told ME that mine didn't have rat poison in it!" *gulp*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erose999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #20
43. 1.) The GOOP won't let the Bush cuts expire - ever. Obama just punted on that one. 2.) Oh goodie,

"Tax Reform". I wonder who the beneficiaries of "Tax Reform" will be with the GOP running things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kalidurga Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. I think they will figure out after....
but claim until the next crisis they won, then they will start crying about all the concessions they made this round to their base to get sympathy for their plan to never raise taxes on the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
30. ROFLMAO!!!!
Are you really that naive? What are you 14 years old or something?

We were fucked by your president

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
51. exactly
this kind of attitude is why we are in this mess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
55. If you are an American he is your president too :)
Is that all you got?
Have a nice day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
40. Teabaggers in congress will "figure it out". They held out for a BBA and a new debt crisis next year
when they forced Boehner to delay the vote of his bill last week. Boehner gave them what they wanted and it still passed by one vote.

This new bill is 'worse' (from a teabagger perspective) than the first Boehner bill that they wouldn't vote for plus now the "much-hated" Obama is pushing it. Unless this new bill picks up some Democratic votes in the House to counteract the loss of all teabagger votes, it doesn't stand a chance of passing.

My bet is that the tea party caucus will "figure it out" and vote unanimously against it. So there's 50 republican "No" votes. We shall see what the 190 repubs who aren't formally in the tea party caucus do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
44. I don't really think this is a win. When we should be spending
to get the economy rolling again, we are, instead, following the sage advice of the teabaggers. The only thing they didn't get was their balanced budget amendment and it wouldn't have mattered if they did because states would have voted it down. As for the Bush tax cuts expiring at the end of 2012, that can be reversed really fast by the next POTUS if the 2012 election is anything like the 2010 election. I'm worried that in 2008, Obama gained a sort of "rock star" status and the groupies appeared in droves and voted him in. The star has faded so I wonder if the 10 million new voters will show up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
45. You forgot
"are you still beating your wife?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
47. Unrec.
for cheerleading delusion. The nutbaggers so won today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
50. The TeaPubliKlans gave up nothing they had, we are taking cuts when we need more money into the
economy.

We didn't win shit. The TeaPubliKlans gained ground so they won whether they see it that way with their mindless avarice or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
56. Oh I get what you're doing. . . Hope the freepers don't catch on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
58. In this football game, maybe the teams can claim victory but the
American people cannot, factually based.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC