Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Analysis: Taxes on table in future debt debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:08 PM
Original message
Analysis: Taxes on table in future debt debate

WASHINGTON — Democrats seeking to use the next phase of deficit-reduction talks to raise taxes for private equity managers, oil companies and high-income earners will face continued opposition from Republicans who will have the procedural power to stop them.

The debt-limit bill signed into law today empowers a 12-member committee of lawmakers to seek $1.5 trillion in deficit cuts, with a Dec. 23 deadline for congressional action. Democrats, who didn't get any revenue increases in the debt ceiling compromise Congress is considering, are likely to return to their previous proposals, said Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee.

"It has to be done in a balanced fashion," Van Hollen told reporters. "It has to include closing these corporate tax loopholes for special interests and looking at other revenue sources from the very top income earners."

<snip>

"It really just becomes an issue of defense vs. high- income," said Chuck Marr, director of federal tax policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a Washington research group that favors programs to assist low-income individuals.

<more>

In other words the GOP is fucked - if they oppose tax increases, they will get massive defense cuts in return.

checkmate

yup


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. yup yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Or this
Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell says that the super committee will “certainly deal with major entitlement reforms,” even as he reassured conservatives that they should not worry about tax hikes, telling a Fox News reporter that the likelihood of tax hikes coming out of the committee is “pretty low.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Democrats won't go for that and the GOP gets massive defense cuts for its stupidity
again

checkmate

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. If you were to read what McConnell inserted, it is NOT
defense cuts, it is rewritten to included SECURITY. You know like TSA and not the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah and they will defund the TSA - Al Qeda lovers they be
but then again they are the terrorists in this crisis - not Obama

and not the Democratic Party

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Those tax "increases" will likely be closing deductions that help the middle class
I don't see this ending well for Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. What part of "raise taxes for private equity managers, oil companies and high-income earners "
don't you get?

sad sack fail

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. What part of that has a snowball's chance in hell of passing don't YOU get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Somehow I don't expect this to play ths way
Past is...prologue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. The future has not been written
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Past is guide to future events
Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. If that's the case, we will never have a woman president
let alone a African-American president

hee hee

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I am basing this on the recent past of surrender by this man
Alas that is what he (and the third way) want. Past behavior is predictive of future behavior, yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. So, what was surrendered here?
The Teabaggers voted to raise the debt ceiling

and they got screwed in the bargain

the way I see it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You will see...the super congress will have a few nasty
Surprises. He lost nothing..he WANTED this, my IMHO. They want an age of austerity. And they want to screw us over.

From neighbors... It is not worth voting again...it pleinly is not. And when people come to thst conclussions... Well the .

And more hostage dramas are coming. When it works, and it works,,, they'll keep doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. But we were told Obama's big spending stimulus package and UI extensions caused this fiscal crisis
the narrative is inconsistent here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. That is a republican message.
Alas at this point I have to conclude he WANTED this crisis, and we are truly screwed.

It goes beyond disaster capitalism, though it is ab importabt part of the explanation.

I will vote, but it dob't make a tinker's damn of a difference... Elites don't care and won't until we wake up and do something about it... But more histage crisis are coming, more fake crisis. Only way to push a very unpopular agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Where do you get the "he wanted this crisis" from?
He did not - it was the Tea Party that wanted this all along.

and Obama did not deliver unto them IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. His december interview, posted here
And two weeks ago this could have been over when McConnell surrendered and he didn't accept the clean bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. McConnell never offered a clean bill - neither did Boner
but you are right - they both surrendered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. McConnell did
Did.not dream that...but whatever. At this point I expect the less than 20% majority to continue to control the debate and ges it's agenda through. It don't matter t they don't even control one chamber of congress. That is the truth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I sincerely do not remember that - linky?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. One among many
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Sorry, that was NOT a clean bill - it was full of GOP strings, chicanery and hurdles
and I remember that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. And here is the december interview
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1643894

Historians will not be kind to this President... no way, no how.

You thought they went after Carter, just wait

He wants this... just to chicken shit to tell us this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Where do you get from that interview that he "wanted this crisis"
"And so my expectation is, is that we will have tough negotiations around the budget, but that ultimately we can arrive at a position that is keeping the government open, keeping Social Security checks going out, keeping veterans services being provided, but at the same time is prudent when it comes to taxpayer dollars..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. He was asked point blank about a crisis
he either is not suave enough to believe one will come... or he wants it. Either way... not good... and historians will not look kindly at this presidency... at least not the last six months,

And the R word is now being used by economists. Austerity... we may have to start using the D word... Hoover is reviled to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. But today he said it was an unnecessary manufactured crisis
Was he being disingenuous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Yes... absolutely
he knows we are up to it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. ugh
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. THat is where I am, as well as many of my RL neighbors
who are thinking of NOT voting... reliable Democratic voters... poof!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Best of luck
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. With what? The austerity plan? Or their Social Security?
or the coming depression? Which exactly? People feel very betrayed and let down.

I'll be voting, but it don't make a tinker's damn of a difference. I need to keep in practice though...

But yes, people in REAL LIFE are not happy... and all that hope and change is gone...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Never underestimate the ability of the Democrats to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory,
They've shown an uncanny ability to do that time and again over the past decade or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Never underestimate the stupidity of teh GOP
They're morans

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. So far, in the past few years,
They've managed to hamstring a government entirely controlled by Democrats, and push forward their agenda quite effectively. I never underestimate anybody, especially when they've got that kind of record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. If you want fair taxes
the first step is the un-elect republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Sharing an earlier and continuing thread, for informed discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Thank you
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. Massive cuts to the VA, maybe.
The Pentagon is going to be fine. So far, they are being cut 50 billion LESS than they were scheduled to be cut.

After Months of Partisan Wrangling, Wall Street & Pentagon Emerge Victorious on Debt Deal

http://www.democracynow.org/2011/8/2/after_months_of_partisan_wrangling_wall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. VA benefits are off the table along with SS and Medicare
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 02:07 PM by jpak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. No they're not. You're wrong. They're sequestered in the trigger, not the special committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. EXACTLY! When is a Defense cut not a Defense cut?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. VA benefits are off the table
FYI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. No, that seems to be incorrect. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. No that is the truth
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. in your dreams. they will be leveraged against no new taxes or some such.
Edited on Tue Aug-02-11 02:35 PM by grahamhgreen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. No - in your dreams
series
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. We'll see!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC