Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

call it what it is: the "Tea Party Downgrade"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 11:27 AM
Original message
call it what it is: the "Tea Party Downgrade"
S&P said as much in their statement last night, without actually saying the words "tea party".

So let's label this properly and keep hammering it home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. The districts that elected these teabaggers need criticism and condemnation.
They put us in the situation by voting to promote ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's exactly what Dem leaders need to call it! k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. I would respect S&P more if they had named the teabaggers
and their congressional minions as the culprits. But I'll take innuendo if that's the best they can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. But...but....Michele Bachmann says it's OBAMA'S FAULT
Can you believe the nerve of these people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. The idiot said more than that
She said if Obama hadn't raised the debt ceiling this wouldn't have happened - how stupid is that woman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Link to S&P statement, note the mention of Medicare ...
debt ceiling should have been raised when the Bush tax cuts were extended in December 2010.


http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/articles/en/us/?assetID=1245316529563

"...We lowered our long-term rating on the U.S. because we believe that the
prolonged controversy over raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related
fiscal policy debate indicate that further near-term progress containing the
growth in public spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an
agreement on raising revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and
will remain a contentious and fitful process. We also believe that the fiscal
consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration agreed to this week
falls short of the amount that we believe is necessary to stabilize the
general government debt burden by the middle of the decade.

...The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as
America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective,
and less predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt
ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in
the debate over fiscal policy. Despite this year's wide-ranging debate, in our
view, the differences between political parties have proven to be
extraordinarily difficult to bridge, and, as we see it, the resulting
agreement fell well short of the comprehensive fiscal consolidation program
that some proponents had envisaged until quite recently. Republicans and
Democrats have only been able to agree to relatively modest savings on
discretionary spending while delegating to the Select Committee decisions on
more comprehensive measures. It appears that for now, new revenues have
dropped down on the menu of policy options. In addition, the plan envisions
only minor policy changes on Medicare and little change in other entitlements,
the containment of which we and most other independent observers regard as key
to long-term fiscal sustainability..."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. If it was only me, I would call it "Tea Rorist Downgrade".
For a better descriptive sound bite.

But "Tea Party Downgrade" is descriptive enough also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip_In_Boulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. I like it!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. I call it the neo confederate downgrade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Obama is as much to blame as the tea party.
Edited on Sat Aug-06-11 05:04 PM by bowens43
He could have stopped it with a stroke of the pen, instead eh encouraged it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. What stroke of a pen would that be? What document would he
have been signing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC