Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SEC Could File Charges against S&P for Meltdown

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 01:22 AM
Original message
SEC Could File Charges against S&P for Meltdown
SEC Could File Charges against S&P for Meltdown

"The recent downgrade on Friday, of the US government by Standard and Poors to question the timing and validity of their downgrade of the full faith and credit of one of the world’s most powerful countries. The action led many to think there was something fishy going on at S&P.

If we go back to 2007 and 2008 just before the Wall Street collapse, we find the rating agency had a hand in the cover up of the real scam going on at AIG, Goldman and Bank of America at the highest possible levels, the CEO’s club of the major US banks. When the Security and Exchange Commission found the source of the derrivative scams, the credit agencies were also under scrutiny and the major rating agency was Standard and Poors."

(snip)

"The names may change, the instruments used may differ but the crime is as old as the hills- its called Fraud, it is criminal and punishment should include deterrents like 20 years in jail. Today S&P may face civil fraud charges for faked and phony credit ratings when they did their analysis of Goldman’s books. A credit rating agency with the reputation that S&P had in the past was all put at risk to give Goldman glowing but fraudulent reports to investors and ultimately to the SEC."

http://www.politicolnews.com/sec-could-file-charges-against-sp-for-meltdown/

Seems the SEC has been investigating S & P for fraud! S & P gave fake reports to investors! Payback?? The article also states that S&P, owned by McGraw Hill, supports Romney for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CleanGreenFuture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. As if the SEC's hands are clean in all this! The ENTIRE system from top to bottom
is corrupt to. the. core!

It needs to be dismantled and rebuilt from scratch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, all we need is a modern-day version of this guy...



National Affairs: Wealth on Trial
(Time Magazine: Monday, June 12, 1933)

(snip)

The real showman of the Morgan investigation, however, was not a circus pressagent. nor a Senator but the kinky-haired, olive-skinned, jut-jawed lawyer from Manhattan named Ferdinand ("Pick") Pecora. Because Senator Fletcher, who at 74 looks like a wealthy Yankee visitor to his own Florida, is not another "Tom"' Walsh with the mental capacity to prosecute his own investigations, Lawyer Pecora was hired last January as the committee's counsel at $255 per month. He had spent weeks ransacking the records of the House of Morgan for material for this trial of a lifetime. In his first fortnight's performance he proved himself a worthy match for white-haired John William Davis, patrician counsel for Banker Morgan.

Ferdinand Pecora was born in Nicosia, Sicily 51 years ago. His grandfather trooped with Garibaldi. His father, a cobbler, took him to the U. S. when he was 5. He attended public school, started to study for the Episcopal ministry, turned aside to the law. In 1912 he campaigned for Theodore Roosevelt. In 1916 he voted for Wilson. Two years later Tammany gave him a job as deputy assistant district attorney. Until 1930 when he retired, his brains really ran that office where he was the principal courtroom prosecutor. He put more than a hundred "bucket shops" out of business and thereby learned the shady side of the brokerage business. He sent State Superintendent of Banks Frank Warder to Sing Sing for taking bribes in the City Trust Co. scandal. He convicted Anti-Saloon Leaguer William H. Anderson of forgery. He prosecuted bail bond racketeers, crooked milk inspectors, big-time thugs—with 80% convictions. He was in charge of the District Attorney's office in 1923 when Anna Marie ("Dot King") Keenan, Broadway "sweetie," was murdered. For days he withheld from the Press the name of John Kearsley Mitchell, "Dot King's" benefactor, son-in-law of Morgan Partner Edward Townsend Stotes-bury, to save Mitchells family from "needless humiliation and suffering.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. agree
But the rating agencies need to fall hard fro what they did in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. S&Ps leadership should have been dragged out of their offices
and charged for the crimes of 2007/8

This is what happens when the criminals are allowed to continue committing crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. What were they waiting for? If S&P didn't downgrade US debt...
would SEC let S&P's fraud slide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. The writing in that article is atrocious
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC