Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What about this proposal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
W_HAMILTON Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 04:49 PM
Original message
What about this proposal?
Given all this talk about "entitlement reform," why not use it to our advantage? Propose this plan:

- Lift the cap on Social Security taxable wages.
- Cap the maximum benefit payout based on an inflation-adjusted taxable base of, say, $250,000. The combination of these first two steps will result in a MASSIVE infusion of funds into Social Security.
- Collect funds until there is enough to pay out projected full benefits for the next 40 years.
- After that point, use excess funds to pay down the national debt.
- Continue this cycle each year. Once there are enough funds to guarantee the next 40 years of benefits, use the excess to pay down the national debt.
- Once the national debt is completely paid down, other taxes may be adjusted lower as long as the government continues to break-even or run a surplus.

It is basically my reverse-Reagan policy. Reagan basically stole wealth from the poor and gave it to the rich by increasing Social Security taxes while lowering income taxes. Given the cap on Social Security taxable wages, this resulted in a net loss for most Americans but a net gain for the wealthiest Americans. Now, we use their plan against them. We aren't raising income taxes, in fact, they may result in them being lowered. Given how everyone wants "entitlement reform" but doesn't want benefits cut, this would help achieve that. People want to pay down the debt, well this would help do that. I'm sure the Republicans will argue against this proposal, but I'd love to watch them try. Most Americans already pay Social Security taxes on 100% of their wages, so I'm guessing they would see this as a more sensible and fair
system.

What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greymattermom Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. income not wages
The high income group pays capitol gains taxes only, not on wages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC