Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Third Way Democrats face a very difficult messaging problem.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 08:55 AM
Original message
Third Way Democrats face a very difficult messaging problem.
Edited on Thu Aug-11-11 09:04 AM by woo me with science
In order to meet the expectations of traditional voting Democrats, the Third Way must maintain the illusion of standing for the same values as traditional Democrats: things like fair taxation, military restraint, and defending safety nets for the elderly and the poor.

At the same time, they must *carry out* a corporate-backed policy agenda that consists of exactly the opposite: things like tax cuts for the wealthy, preservation and expansion of the military industrial complex, and cutting of the social welfare system.

This is why their messaging feels bizarre and crazy-making. There is always an abrupt, painful oscillation between claiming vehemently that they represent the same progressive values and goals as other Democrats (e.g., "The President wants the same things you do. He just can't get them PASSED right now!")...

...and then accusing other Democrats of being extreme and unreasonable for having those very values and goals.

*
*
*

It's a tough tightrope to walk. It requires a politician to engage in bizarre public contortions like:

claiming repeatedly to be a defender of the poor and most vulnerable among us, while simultaneously putting 650 billion in Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security cuts on the bargaining table.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/07/22/remarks-president

Or instructing a public relations team to stress commitment to Democratic ideals, while simultaneously warning them to avoid talking about details of actual policies on the war and taxes. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1670271



And this disconnect, by the way, is why people are so confused about what this administration is really doing. It produces exactly the type of conflicting signals that lead people to think that an administration is "weak" or "waffling" rather than deliberately circumspect and crafty about rhetoric.

We need to reclaim our party.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Big K&R.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yet they expect us to go out there and stump for them...
I'm a hardcore, party line Democrat for the past 25 years I've been able to vote. And even I can't make heads or tails of what this administration stands for, what it wants, and what it will and will not fight for. How do they expect me or anyone else to be able to convince someone who is less invested and less politically aware?

Oh, I forgot. We're just supposed to say "The Republicans are crazy!!!" and that's going to have to be enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well said. "Vote for me, or else..."
is not a winning campaign slogan.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well said. Third Way is absurd and has too much influence. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is eactly why our President is now being called weak and
Edited on Thu Aug-11-11 09:21 AM by OHdem10
God forbid, a one termer. When you have Democrats saying
things like this out loud, the Third Way had better wake
up and smell the coffee.

They sound like FAKE REPUBLICANS and we saw what happened
to FAKE REPUBLICANS in 2010 elections.

They are beginning to look and sound as inhibited, and tentative
as Mitt Romney. I am only using Romney as an example. Watching
how he has become so afraid to speak for fear of offending
the Whackos, the Third Way is coming across the same way.

Watching Mitt, no one could ever imagine this person
was a Big Player in Bain Capital??? He has become totally
inauthentic.

The Third Way in their efforts to appease Republicans, we
cannot find our once bold charismatic President.

What would happen if Mitt walked out on the stage in the
same persona that made him successful at Bain. At least
he would be authenic.

What would happen if our President came out and from the
bottom of his heart offered a sensible plan for getting
Americans to work--yes building and repairing stuff in
this country. Saying the Republican Talking Point
Government does create jobs, the Private Sector does.(This
jkis a losing line for a Democrat in times like these.
The Independents say to this: We may as well support
the real Republican.

Authentic means being who you are: not pretending to be
some folksy down home candidate ()Romeny) or a fake Republican
(Obama).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. You are right that deception does not appeal to the electorate.
It confuses them initially, and when they figure out what is going on, it pisses them off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. Very well put.
K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. totally agree -
The Democratic Party has split in a similar fashion as the British Labor Party which has its socialist wing led by Tony Benn - and its 'New Labor' wing brought to you by Tony Blair, et. al. Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher (1979-90) referred to her greatest success as the creation of Tony Blair (1997-2007) and who recorded unprecedented three terms in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. None of this is by accident. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Every Democratic legislator has a significant partisan voting record. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katnapped Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Gotta watch for the operatives right here
Who portray traditional Democratic values as being "kooky" and "unrealistic"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. There's a subtler form of that used in Presidential speeches...
when he repeatedly dismisses supposed extremists on both sides.

It is a stock part of his speeches to identify unreasonable children on the Right who want such-and-such, and unreasonable children on the Left who want such-and-such, while trying to portray himself as the reasonable, centrist "grown-up."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. That is right.
Those that want reasonable taxes on the wealthy or want to preserve the New Deal are labeled as "fringe".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. Precisely. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. They seem to be fooling people quite well if you ask me.
The average Joe is voting for their Democratic representative thinking they are voting for traditional Democratic Party positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. yes, but some are catching on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. Nailed it K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. more and more voters realize how the actions contradict the rhetoric
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. Your post seems to describe our situation perfectly....
I'd love to share your post.....

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. K&R
If I wanted to fight for the rights of the rich to screw the rest of the country, I'd already be a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. "warning them to avoid talking about
....details of actual policies on the war and taxes."

Here's a good example of how an MSM title obscures what the President says
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialindependocrat Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
23. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
24. Yes. There are however other factions of the party which
has also caused it great harm. It has alienated die hard long standing democrats. The democratic party use to stand for unions, social security, medicare and more. Instead things like abortion, gay marriage, gun control etc. were added. Many in the party have bought into corporatism with 401k's and the like. I'm not against abortion or gay marriage. Abortion is a tricky issue. I don't feel a person should screw around with out birth control and have multiple abortions. On the other side, I feel a woman should have the right to make that choice on her own. She is the one that has to live with her abortion choice. Marriage is a religious issue and should have never been a government topic anyway. Not in a free society. The mantra of a lot of people is "what choice do we have? I won't vote for a republican “. Well that is your choice but many moderates who voted for Obama and other congressional members, expected them to fix this mess and they haven't. They had their chance and blew it. They didn't even make an attempt. So anyone who is surprised at the losing of the presidential election, thanks a lot. Flame on torches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC