Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's the jobs, stupid. Rachel asks why the "super congress" can divert all attention to the debt.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 08:09 AM
Original message
It's the jobs, stupid. Rachel asks why the "super congress" can divert all attention to the debt.
Edited on Fri Aug-12-11 08:12 AM by Scuba
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/#44114857



Is the charge of the so-called super committee on debt a chance for Congress to absolve themselves of responsibility for doing anything else, like a jobs program?

Well, the Democrats in Congress (at least some) aren't willing to sit on the sidelines.

With guest Rep Jan Schakowski, D-Illinois


Runs 11:20

On edit: Schakowski points out that all six of the R's on the "super commttee" have signed the "Norquist Pledge" to not raise taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Conservatives in both parties rule and there is not that
much difference betwwen the two. Conservatives see the
Deficit as the issue. Conservatives are not big into
Safety Nets. Conservatives protect the Rich.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is beginning to appear that the People who count
in both parties have decided to just move along
leaving a large swath of workers (aound 45 and up)
behind. Neither side is interested in tackling
the jobs issue. They mouth the "education" line.
Educaation we know is a long term solution. This
will help our children. In the meantime, there is
no appetite for the theory: When Business is paralyzed
and does not move, then the Govt. steps in with
with Repairing Schools, Bridges Highways, Building
things that will assist Business in the future.
Excellent Trasnportation Systems and Infrasture
contribute to businesses success. The theory is
have all these ready to go when the economy turns
around for Business. The Governmet pulls back from
Job Creation as soon as Business is ready to go
for it. Small Government People cannot have
big dreams I guess. This is how we began to get
a middle class in the past. We no longer have
dreamers, eat your peas, suck in your waist and
each man for himself and dog eat dog.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. the super-committee's charge is not to get the economy going, nor to create jobs.
it was designed to come up with spending cuts and possibly tax increases.
all 6 republicans will vote against any jobs program unless it's a jobs program in name only and really a tax break for corporations.

that doesn't mean, though, that congress can't take up a jobs initiative separately. not all congressional work flows through the super committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I can already hear the cries of "interfering with the committee". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. or soshulizm, or whatever. republicans are never at a loss for rotten things to say.
especially about any effort to actually help people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. The real challenge is to identify the reasons why our manufacturing and service jobs have left...
...and make the changes necessary for the country to be competitive in a world market. They might start by looking at where we stand in terms of labor costs, energy costs, taxes and regulation and comparing that to the deal that other countries are offering businesses. I expect they will find that we are not business friendly in any of those areas. From there, they need to identify steps to take that will fix that.

Government funded infrastructure spending is not going to incentivize manufacturing companies to build plants here. It will just make it easier to move products that arrived in containers from China to stores like Walmart around the country. The same thing with tax cuts - they do produce jobs, but unfortunately, the jobs haven't been and won't be created here. Unless we offer a better deal to businesses, the jobs will continue to be found in China, Korea, India, etc.

This will not be a popular view here, but in my opinion, it is the only approach that will work in the long run. Competition is here to stay and the sooner we recognize that and start dealing with it, the better off we will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. the real problem is that we have unilaterally lowered our economic defenses
anything that provides an incentive to create jobs in america, republicans kill.
anything that makes it advantageous hire domestically instead of outsources, republicans kill.

and yet we do business with countries that have all sorts of protectionist measures to help themselves.

china is a great example. their exchange rate controls are a simple and direct form of protectionism -- they are artificially lowering the price of chinese goods and artificially raising the price of non-chinese goods. so of course we buy chinese and can't sell anything close to a comparable amount there.

free trade works, at least in theory, if BOTH sides have free trade. but if only one side has free trade, the other side can get away with murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That is a big part of the problem and badly needs to be addressed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
True Blue Democrat Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. I believe anything that will come out of "super committee" will be challenged on a constitutional
Edited on Fri Aug-12-11 09:55 AM by True Blue Democrat
basis.

I find it very highly illegal that all 12 useless Rethuglicans signed an illegal pledge to a non-government entity (who probably is dodging taxes as we speak) to not to raise taxes when raising revenues is the very thing that is needed to fix the problem.

The only solutions? Remove all Republicans from Congress, and replace them with true-blue progressive Democrats.

And throw the fucking Norquist in prison for life.

Thus endeth the farce of the "Super Congress" and will be written in the history book as yet another Republican bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because asking the useless members of congress to actually show something
for all the money we actually pay them would be an anathema to why they believe they are in office.

and frankly, given the unbelievable "success" they have shown regarding anything in the past, do you really want to trust a bunch of trust fund congress morons with trying to create jobs?

Even if we gave them instructions on how to create jobs, they would send us back a yak that farts out the national anthem instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC