Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you believe Obama would have used the 14th Amendment had midnight come on August 2nd?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 10:33 PM
Original message
Do you believe Obama would have used the 14th Amendment had midnight come on August 2nd?
Now we can have this counterfactual discussion in hindsight.

Had the US been in a situation of imminent default on midnight August 2nd (or whatever the deadline date was) with no debt ceiling increase from Congress, do you think Obama would have pulled the trigger, invoked the 14th and simply raised the debt ceiling on his own? Or would he have thrown his hands up in the air and let the nation go into default?

Obama is so averse to conflict and combat that it is really hard to say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. You can bet your bottom dollar
this was ready to go in motion if necessary, risks and all. No way this administration or any past administration would have let the U.S. default. IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He'll probably say what he would have done when he writes his memoirs
But even that can be hard to discern from. It's a what if counterfactual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. He'd have gone for the 7th Amendment
Right in the middle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Bwahahahaha!
Edited on Thu Aug-18-11 10:53 PM by valerief
:rofl:

Or he would have triangulated the 7th and 21st to get to the 14th. Prohibition Part Deux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. No, because the 14th Amendment doesn't say anything like that.
It would have gone to court, and immediately been lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MFrohike Donating Member (210 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. hahaha no
I don't see him ever doing such a thing. It would be a modern-day version of crossing the Rubicon, if only in miniature. In that scenario, I see him as far more Pompey than Caesar.

His likely response if there had been no compromise would have been to watch the default happen, then make a speech which was even-handed in the blame while offering platitudes. Honestly, I don't think it would be too much different from what we've seen the last couple of weeks. He offers a weak condemnation of a pack of raving barbarians while trotting out some "solution" that is just a chimera.

I don't like to sound so pessimistic, but it's always been apparent that he just doesn't have the heart to fight. I think he's spent his life trying to be above the fray without realizing that an elected position is very much in the fray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. No. It would have been too much like confrontation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. The tragedy is, all that happened with the debt ceiling debacle was totally unnecessary.


Link



I'll bet it's not even a passing thought on Martha's Vineyard tonight.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. If He Did, the Supreme Court Would Overrule Him as Fast as You Can Say "Bush v. Gore"
Certainly the Repig leadership had their couriers on standby to get a motion to the USSC within minutes of any such ruling, and
we can be equally certain that the Supreme Court's response has already been written and for whose side they would rule.

Most likely Obama already heard from a majority of Justices, warning him against any such step.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Perhaps, but maybe he would have defied the Supreme Court?
Like ordering Tim Geithner to proceed with Treasury auctions anyway.

I don't know, but Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Jackson both ignored the USSC on two occasions and there were no consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Probably not, actually. Paraphrasing Jack Balkin:


The courts would likely treat the constitutional issues as nonjusticiable under the "political question" doctrine, as they do in the case of war powers.

http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=726122&mesg_id=726227

Main thread:

http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=726122&mesg_id=726122
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-11 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes.
I believe he probably had his OLC combing all over it day and night for weeks, along with any other options (see link), and he would very reluctantly done the crucial thing. As fraught as invoking the 14th was with potential political fallout, the political repercussions for failure to act in the final hour would have been far greater for him.

http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=726122&mesg_id=726122

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stklurker Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. No
The 14th does not address RAISING the debt limit. Court would have flipped it in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-11 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. I think he would have if for no other reason so that he would not get
blamed for failing to stop the collapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC