Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds to AGs: Can't Touch This - CreditSlips

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 07:48 PM
Original message
Feds to AGs: Can't Touch This - CreditSlips
Feds to AGs: Can't Touch This
posted by Adam Levitin
August 2011

<snip>

As this NYT story notes, the administration has been putting pressure on the AGs, particularly NY AG Schneiderman, for several weeks now, urging them to fall in line with the administration's hear-no-evil, see-no-evil position on MBS and servicing fraud. The NYT story makes it sound as if the feds were jolted into intervening because of pleas from the banks. It's enough to make one think that we're back in 2005.

There are three things that particularly bother me about what's happening.

First, is that if the Feds had shown some teeth on servicing, the AGs wouldn't have to be the ones cleaning up the mess. The AGs are acting because the federal bank regulators are dancing to the same tune they were in 2000-2008: Can't Touch This. (Now they're saying to the AGs "Please, Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em". Yuck, yuck, yuck.) Milquetoast consent orders (that impose costs on servicers without getting better servicing) and no criminal prosecutions so far other than of the garden variety warehouse fraud (Farkas et al.). It's sad to see Shaun Donovan get in on this act, though, and then claim that his intervention was "motivated by a desire to speed up help for troubled homeowners." Please.

Second, and what really galls me, is that the administration doesn't have a serious alternative. The administration is flat out of ideas on servicing and has been so for at least a year. It's not that there aren't possibilities, but none are politically palatable to an administration that is terrified of rubbing Wall Street the wrong way. It'd be one thing if there were a plan. But the administration's got nadda. Schneiderman's intervention in the BNYM settlement isn't holding up much needed servicing reform. That's just nonesense. There's nothing stopping BoA from entering into sub-servicing arrangements today if they wanted to. Even if the settlement were approved today, it would take months, if not over a year before the BoA servicing was properly transferred to third-party servicers.

Frankly, it's too late to help a lot of homeowners. We're not in damage control mode anymore, as unemployment, rather than mortgage product features is increasingly the driving force behind foreclosures. We're just doing mop-up. Put differently, the administration missed its chance to really do something on the foreclosure front when it went it opted for the weak, half-measure of HAMP. If the administration had taken aggressive action in the winter-spring of 2009, maybe things would be different. But it went with a soft-touch approach whose limits and flaws were patent from day one.

Third...

<snip>

More: http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2011/08/cant-touch-this.html

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Gentleman Is Correct, Sir
And there is no reason whatever for the state officials to truckle to the federals on this matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. So. The "Rule of Law" applies to cannabis users.....
...to foreclosed upon homeowners and to "illegal" immigrants visiting their ancestral homeland.

But it never applies to the goddamned criminal bankers, 'eh Barry? Slaps on the wrists all round boys!!!!

They give them our money and then these fuckers want them to pay their fines with it.

- What a bunch of sorry, fucking asswipes we have for leaders in this pitiful country......


K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. +1, Agreed & Well Said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. yep... seriously
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavWriter Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why are the Democrats
bending over backward to protect the Bankers that destroyed the economy? What is the excuse now? Is anyone with money too big to fail? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. "The administration is flat out of ideas...."
Well, except for Republican ones, I guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. I just had someone in another thread about this tell me none of it is true, supposedly
according to the idiot (and I will not mention the moran to spare him humiliation).
That it was as untrue as flat earth theories as both can be linked to on the internet, this is starting to scare me, the willfull ignorance and denial is getting beyond crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC