Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Perry’s Anti-Abortion Law Takes Effect This Week, Requiring Women To Get A Sonogram 24 Hours Before

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 04:15 PM
Original message
Perry’s Anti-Abortion Law Takes Effect This Week, Requiring Women To Get A Sonogram 24 Hours Before
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2011/08/29/306499/perrys-anti-abortion-law-takes-effect-this-week-requiring-women-to-get-a-sonogram-24-hours-before-an-abortion/

This Thursday marks the beginning of Texas’ new fiscal year, and with it a slew of conservative legislation signed by Gov. Rick Perry (R) takes effect.

Among those laws is the highly controversial sonogram law Perry signed in May, forcing pregnant women seeking abortions to undergo a medically unnecessary ultrasound at least 24 hours before an abortion and to hear a description of the fetus:

One new law requires a doctor to attempt to show a woman seeking an abortion a sonogram of the fetus, to describe the image and to provide the sound of the fetal heartbeat before the procedure. Federal Judge Sam Sparks is expected to rule before Thursday on a challenge to the law by the Center for Reproductive Rights.

“This law is intrusive, patronizing to women and unconstitutional,” said Julie Rikelman, the center’s lead attorney on the case. She said patients should be given only the information and medical tests appropriate for the circumstances and that a doctor should not have to act as a “government agent.”

The sonogram law is a transparent attempt by anti-abortion activists to chip away at women’s constitutional right to end a pregnancy. The Senate sponsor of the bill, Dan Patrick (R) hailed it as “the beginning of the end for abortions,” and said he was so proud that he was “inspired to wear my cowboy hat” when Perry signed the bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. How sick is this!
I am completely disgusted with this man.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Incredibly sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I feel for Texas women. It truly disgusts me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And who's paying for these?
Remember how conservatives would rail against "unfunded mandates?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe we should send all those children who go into adoption
because of this right to Perry's house, let him take care them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. This sentence is truly frightening: "Texas conservatives initially refused to include exceptions...
...of rape, incest, and fetal abnormality in the bill."

Kyyyyyrist these people are sick! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. The state is requiring unnecessary medical procedures.
I wonder if this could be fought in court. There's no medical justification for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my2sense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. this is from the same party who has as one of its main ways to lower health care costs
to remove unnecessary medical procedures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Texas women need to stand up
and stop this bastard in his tracks. I don't care what the state, I believe the majority of women in the US are pro-choice. They may not admit it in public, but in their hearts and minds most women of at least average intelligence want choice for themselves. If I lived in Texas I would do everything in my power to start a movement against him, for women, for choice, and to keep him from getting anywhere near the presidency.

Perry is a dangerous man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. so what is the medical purpose of the law?
I assume they couldn't even come up with a weak justification, and the whole purpose is just to intimidate a woman into not getting an abortion. You figure the assholes would at least be honest enough to admit that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Disturbing and deeply misogynist.
The ugly people who inflict this damage on women's lives and health should be ashamed of themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think most people are missing just how invasive this is.
That early in a pregnancy, the fetus can't be seen using an external sonogram on the belly. The fetus is just too small.

Instead, they're going to have to put a probe into the woman's vagina. The probes aren't exactly small. And it can take quite a bit of manipulation to position the probe so it can see the fetus.

But hey, gotta punish those sluts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC