Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NASA 'plans to spend US dollars 1.6 bn on space taxis'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 09:55 AM
Original message
NASA 'plans to spend US dollars 1.6 bn on space taxis'
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/et-cetera/nasa-plans-to-spend-us-dollars-1-6-bn-on-space-taxis/articleshow/10051504.cms

WASHINGTON: NASA has plans to spend a whopping US dollars 1.6 billion over the next two years in a bid to bolster industry efforts to develop " space taxis", a media report said.

The US space agency will be looking for complete systems - launchers, spaceships, mission operations and ground support - to ferry astronauts to the InternationalSpace Station by the middle of the decade, 'The Daily Telegraph' online reported.

The money will supplement investments that private firms are making to develop commercial space transportation services, the report said.

US President Barack Obama has requested US dollars 850 million for NASA's so-called Commercial Crew initiative for the year beginning October 1. The Senate Appropriations Committee last week offered US dollars 500 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was hoping for something a little more ambitious than an earth-orbit taxi. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dembotoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. better than nothing--good thing it is not called a space train-because then
the republicans would be against it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'd settle for a great space coaster at this point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. it's a bit of a let down. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Why think big when you can think stupid?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. They've got that too - the Space Launch System:
The biggest variant of this design can carry a bigger payload than the Saturn V!

http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2011/09/the-current-future-of-human-spaceflight-the-space-launch-system.ars

Of course, it, and the space taxis are still vaporware, so don't expect too much...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Whopping $1.6 billion? That's about 15 days of war in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Any "whopping" amount NASA spends is better than the real amounts the Pentagon is blowing through.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I was going to point that out
Hell, they 'misplaced' several times that amount at the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owlet Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's been done already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. Most of the 1.6 billion dollars will be used to provide jobs ...
for workers. Those jobs will pay well and if the program is successful, could provide long term employment.

The workers will buy homes, cars and household appliances and the money they make will be pumped back into the economy to create more jobs.

This sounds like a good plan to me, although it is a bit on the small side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC