Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guns. Can't Live With 'em. Can't Live Without 'em.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 09:04 PM
Original message
Guns. Can't Live With 'em. Can't Live Without 'em.
There's something irresistible-ish about 'em.

Guns. Our Nation has had a love affair with these things since long before Columbus first met up with the Arawak Indians. It's in our blood, our culture and our laws.

As most folks know, the Second Amendment gives us the right to arm ourselves, and form militias. Either as National Guard type things, or as standing military in peacetime (read: a bunch of rednecks go out in the woods and shoot things.)

Although I find this gun worship silly, I do believe in unfettered access to firearms, so long as you are sane and don't have a habit of robbing banks or stagecoaches (besides, the biggest crimes happen without a gun, and up a few floors from the ground, if you know what I mean, and I know you know what I mean!

Now that's where the incident in Tuscon, or the attempted assassination of a hard working public servant. Yes, I understand almost all public servants get paid far less than their value to society. This goes from everyone from the janitors to the IT staffs to the folks who "win" elections. Considering many folks in Congress could have gone into the private sector and made far more money. I mean, you'd be running against folks like Meg Whitman and Caly Fiorina! These folks ran their respective companies into the ground! But I digress.

Anyway, the assassin, Jared Lee Loughner is and was mentally ill. Everything that has been described of him shows a man like many assassins before him - someone who is obsessed over killing and death. Radical mood-swings. Radical changes in their personality from one day to the next. And everyone around him thought he was dangerous.

So - even though I value the right to bear arms - could we add 'insane' to the list of folks who don't get to buy and carry guns legally?

I mean, shit - a dishonorable discharge prevent you from obtaining firearms legally. Some poor gay man who was fired for being who he is is barred from buying a gun, but the insane - go right ahead! Buy any gun you want!!!

I've heard discussion of regulating the size of the magazine - and I don't know if that's such a good idea. But preventing someone who's harboring psychotic thoughts from getting a gun - no brainer.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well said - and regarding Virginia Tech...
...Seung-hui Cho was clearly insane, and there were papers from his counselor that would have barred him from buying guns and using them to slaughter students on campus, but the stupid counselor never shared those papers with the authorities. He kept those papers at home. His incompetence played a huge role in enabling Cho to shoot up VTech.

We need those in charge of maintaining the mental health of Americans to not fall asleep at the switch. That would be a big help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I keep saying 'bring back the state mental hospitals' but I get jumped on for that
If we had a place where the most important organ in our bodies was taken care of, we wouldn't have half of the violence problems we are having now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Not if it meant bringing back state mental hospitals with their bad conditions
and level of care for which they were infamous. Warehouses for the mentally ill. Out of sight, out of mind.

Nobody with a loved one with mental help problems would want to see them end up in any place like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. False as to fact
The *documented* crazies are already precluded from owning firearms. Loughner is crackers but under the current protocols nothing was on the record. That needs to be fixed and not some feel good magazine limit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Agreed nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree with you
but one has to consider a person's right to privacy including medical records. If we allow medical records open to background checks will we allow a woman's medical records reopened, i.e. Roe v Wade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do they allow the insanity defense in Arizona?
Does anyone know?

Because they don't in Idaho.
Not even if they are certifiably insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. We can totally live without them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Billions of people do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Billions of people THINK they do
Actually ask anyone about guns in the UK. Average joe doesn't have one, but the local thug does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. There are several big problems with that.
Privacy laws prevent disclosure of mental illness unless someone commits a crime or unless a doctor thinks the person is a threat to himself or others. Since the person who is mentally ill doesn't believe there's anything wrong with them, which is a direct function of the disease, it's very hard if not impossible to label them dangerous before they buy a gun and massacre people.

And most of the gun deaths in this country: 82 killed every single fucking day, and 200 injured every single fucking day, are carried out by people who are not mentally ill.

So gun control is the only answer. Look at countries with tough gun control laws and compare their deaths to the deaths in the US. It's a no-brainer.

Of course, the gun porn crowd doesn't want to think about that because it blows their arguments out of the water. Literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Problem with gun control is that (1) it won't work. Law abiding folks might turn theirs in
Although they probably won't and (2) The criminals will always have guns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. You're right, why try. What the hell were we thinking when we supported the AWB!?
After all, large extended magazines are cool looking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Again, I'm not sure if it would work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. It worked just fine until that law sunset in 2004, when Republitards in Congress didn't renew it.
Most of which, are NOT in office anymore!!


Believe me, I know what I am talking about.
I talked about it for 50 days before the AWB sunset in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. How did it work, exactly?
Since it didn't ban possession or sale of:

Anything it purported to ban which was made or possessed before the ban went into effect?


It banned the marketing of some rifles under a few names.


Bottom line, is that it did not effect availability of anything what so ever. Not in its first year, and not in its last year. The study REQUIRED by its passage could find no evidence of it working.

So how exactly did it work?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. "So gun control is the only answer. Look at countries with tough gun control laws..." Like Mexico?
Or Jamaica?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Or hell, UK
Gun violence is high there, something you wouldn't think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Our Nation has had a love affair with these things since long before Columbus first met up with...
...the Arawak Indians."

No matter how hard I try, I can't wrap my mind around that sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Sorry - lemme rephrase that
Not before, since....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VioletLake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. "Our nation" wasn't "born" until 284 years AFTER Columbus' discovery. nt
Edited on Sat Jan-15-11 05:19 PM by VioletLake
Edit: I was off by 10 years the first time ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. I fear we will need a few more of these events (Graphic)
before this fully changes and people realize that we need to do something.

Realize the gun lovers think of 2nd amendment in absolute terms... and the NRA jumped the shark a while ago, like 20 years ago.



This is NOT graphic enough... our media don't help.

It is high time they start printing things like this.









Until Americans are ONCE AGAIN exposed to this they will not realize what their beloved toys do. The photos kind of take the sexiness out of them. Hell the photo of Congresswoman Giffords was as graphic as we allow them...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. We Have an enormous propensity for absorbing that stuff.
At this point - at this point massacres a la Tucson
Would have to happen even more frequently than they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Our media still will not print a photo of a dead guy
Edited on Sat Jan-15-11 06:41 PM by nadinbrzezinski
Unless...it is covered by a tarp, a yellow tarp.

They are part of the problem. This is why the image of the tough hombre a la Hollywood is so prevalent...

And some of them are down right comically wrong as well... Arnie running down a hill and firing two high powerered weapons and chiefly hitting... The kind of guns that require a tripod in real life for a damn reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. "This is NOT graphic enough... our media don't help." Yes, wave the bloody shirt for political gain
How does your stance differ from those anti-abortion types that parade around with giant pictures of aborted fetuses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. I think 2nd Amend, "absolutists" terms are balanced by those who want to repeal the 2nd Amend,


and confiscate all guns.

Violent crime statistics and images point to the need to allow law abiding folks to protect themselves from criminals as well as the need to stem criminal activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC