Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vintage Right-Wing Whine: Hank Jr. Says His First Amendment Rights Were Violated By ESPN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 07:13 PM
Original message
Vintage Right-Wing Whine: Hank Jr. Says His First Amendment Rights Were Violated By ESPN
http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/hank-williams-jr-bogus-claim-says-his-f

After Hank Williams disastrous Fox & Friends appearance where he compared President Obama to Hitler and called him the "enemy" was so egregious that it even Gretchen disavowed his comments, I told you he'd use the 'Laura Defense' or the ludicrous victimhood "First Amendment' defense' which conservative and tea party activists love to trot out when they say things so far out of bounds that a company which caters to many right wing viewers like ESPN does, had to sever ties with him over.

If Gretchen said that they disavowed his disgusting comments then you know it was way, way, way out there. And his remarks caused ESPN to pull him off of Monday Night Football tonight.

“While Hank Williams Jr. is not an ESPN employee, we recognize that he is closely linked to our company through the open to Monday Night Football. We are extremely disappointed with his comments, and as a result we have decided to pull the open from tonight’s telecast.”

I'm sure he'll use the Dr. Schlessinger defense of saying his first amendment rights were just violated by ESPN

More at the link --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. If he isn't an ESPN employee is he doing it for free?
Communist!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, because the 1st Amendment clearly guarantees everyone's right
to appear on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thats a load of shit.....
the only thing good about Hank Jr. is HANK III.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. isn't 1st amendment about the government preventing you from voicing your opinions?
because ESPN isn't the government and therefore are free to do whatever they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. A dumb-ass like Williams don't understand that difference.
ESPN made a business decision, if they kept that sack of shit on, fans would walk away in droves. Now, all ESPN will loose are racists and numb brained dumb-asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Ironically, if there were a law which protected people in this situation
Hank and all his right wing cronies would whine about government intrusion into the affairs of private businesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'll make sure to dispatch the waaaahhmbulence.
Someday, some of these morons are going to learn that the first amendment means the government can't ban you from showing yourself off to be a moron, racist, or asshole. It does NOT require other people to give you a venue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. What is new. Rightwingers are some of the most aggressive people on
the planet, and when their heads are handed to them, they cry foul like the asinine babies that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hey Hank...take that sorry assed song and shove it up your ass !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. They Didn't Say He Couldn't Express His Opinion
They simply indicated they didn't want to be associated with anyone who expresses that opinion, and it is their right to congregate freely (or not in this case) with whomever they wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hank has exercised his right to free speech.........
ESPN management has expressed their dislike of what Hank said (exercising their right to free speeach) by yanking Hank's crummy song from their televised event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. So were the Dixie Chicks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. The first amendment only applies to the government...not to private companies.
Gah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hank Jr - another twit who flunked Constitution 101
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. His rights weren't violated, he can say whatever he wants
but that doesn't mean that he is entitled to a paycheck for it. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC