Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is a thousand times bigger and stronger than the Tea Party.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 03:40 PM
Original message
This is a thousand times bigger and stronger than the Tea Party.
Politicians should be very afraid.

All those that sold out the people for their big corporate donations are at risk, no matter what their Party affiliation. This is not a Democratic or Republican movement. This is a People movement.

The Tea Party was an instinctual Party that knew something was wrong. But they didn't know what it was and they were soon captured and taken over by the corporate Republican Party. But these folks know what is wrong and they will not be a servant to any political Party.

If a Third Party is born from this movement, it will be very, very strong. It is almost inevitable. The change will come from either political or violent means. It is my opinion that it will not be violent. These are people of peace.

It is a reason for hope. These are mostly young people. They are a new generation. They are changing the world before our eyes. Power does not surrender voluntarily. But they will be defeated.

It is a time for celebration. I stand with the Occupation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm with OWS and I hope something new comes of this, I'm tired of
feeling used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Tea Party is a corporate construct - a fabrication - a false party.
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 03:50 PM by Avalux
OWS is the antithesis of the Tea Party. The movement has organically grown and will continue to grow...I will do everything I can to support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. True, but that way has disadvantages too
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 03:57 PM by dmallind
It's easier to sing the same tune if someone is paying the piper. It's easier to start a movement if the direction is clearly defined top-down. In much the same way, atheists who outnumber Jews, Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists combined get far less traction than any in the public discussion about religion precisely because we have no unifying doctrine or magisterium to which pundits (including Hindu ones ;)) can refer. The Kochs and Fox et al orchestrated a much smaller, much less real movement than OWS, but it WAS orchestrated, and there's a reason the London Philharmonic gets more attentive listeners than a collection of buskers in London ten times their number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I strongly disagree. The OWS protesters are singing the same tune - economic injustice.
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 04:21 PM by Avalux
It's just not clearly defined and honed like a political message, or media-friendly soundbyte. The OWS protesters didn't need a leader and a message to tell them what to think. They came together and took ACTION; based on their own thoughts.

Actually "I am the 99%" is a perfect message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Agree! And IMO one of the best parts of OWS is no political affiliation, so it
can cut across the political spectrum. I find it hard to believe every R and I is siting on a few million and PO'ed at OWS. And that, of course, is why the politicians fear it so much IMO. OWS has the potential to define an entirely new political spectrum in this country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. The difference to me is that the Tea Party wanted to go back to...
a time that never existed and OWS wants something new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. The OWS movement should hit up the Koch Brothers for a donation
After all, the ones who funded the Tea Party have stated that we should admire the "grass roots" aspect of American citizens protesting the way the original colonists protested by dumping tea into Boston Harbor. And the new Tea Party originally came about because of the dissatisfaction over the Wall Street bailout. The occupiers on Wall Street should invite the Koch Brothers to give them a few million dollars. Any day now, I'm sure David Koch will be cutting a fat check to fund the type of grass roots citizen and populist movement he claims to admire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. expect the ows protests to get bigger once the super committee
comes out with the new cuts....it won't be the big guys getting cut...it will be the 99%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You could be right...
It is an arrogant bunch of elitists that think the people aren't watching...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Good point. A little more wood on the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. Anyone with a lick of sense and even a modicum of knowledge should know
upon whom the brunt of the sacrifice will fall. The term shared sacrifice is shamefully and disingenuously euphemistic. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. There are not two parties in this country but one--the party of money, with two branches
I just heard a Chicago teacher on Ed Schultz's show say that. I think she was a union leader but I didn't catch her name at the start of the interview.

She said that we should be very clear about the fact that there are not two political parties in this country, but one: the party of money, with two branches.

I don't necessarily 100% agree with her--I think there are a few really good, progressive, genuinely dedicated public servants in our party and in the Independent Party--but I thought it was some tasty food for thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just because we are people of peace doesn't mean it won't get violent
The other side love their guns and they think God gives them the right to use them.

If OWS becomes successful there will be violence. It will start on the other side and OWS will have no recourse except to defend themselves.

Lots of people think the marchers in the 60s started the violence, but that not what happened. The violence stepped up considerably when Nixon decided he wanted to literally beat the demonstrators out of the streets. It started in Kent State when students were shot and killed.

During the earlier days marches were very peaceful. Joan Baez used to sing at them.

Violence will come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I remember the '60's..
You could be right. I hope they can keep it non-violent but there are indications that provocateurs have already been planted and we have seen some violence from the police already.

But I think this generation is smarter and has learned a lot from history.

Glen Beck said today that these protesters were violent and that they would drag people like him out of their houses and kill them... A lot of people are very scared about what is happening, especially those in the top 1%...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. MLK Jr and the Civil right marches were peaceful ones too
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 05:52 PM by lunatica
They were treated horribly by the police and remember them using water cannons to disperse the crowds?







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes, they were vicious...
I think the Mayor and the powers that be are making a political calculation not to be too violent with this group for fear it could backfire on them. They are hoping it will eventually fade away. The longer it lasts, the more likelihood for violence, in my opinion.

First of all, they will attempt to turn public opinion against the OWS. Then they will not hesitate to attempt to disperse the crowds. So far, the public is with the OWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. But later in 60's there were civil rights riots
And more militant movement as people got sick of getting heads bashed in.

I'm not predicting that for OWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. The riots were a result of assasinations, and other one way violence, imo.
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 04:07 AM by joshcryer
It wasn't about heads getting bashed in, a movement can handle being hosed down and tear gassed. But once you start bombing people, it gets a bit ridiculous and shit hits the fan (see the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. And many IQ points higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. 1000x the tea party but will get 1/1000th of the coverage...
But then we will win in the end. It is just a matter or recognizing that we have to do it.

If not us who?

If not now when?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. I agree with you. There's no comparison in my mind.
... although every maintream media outlet wants to give that impression. Time will tell... OWS is an honest, real movement, which has only just begun but has been brewing for quite some time.

We only see the tiniest tip of the iceberg right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
21. "TheTea Party was an instinctual Party that knew something was wrong".
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 04:22 AM by Politicalboi
LOL! Yeah a Black man was in the White House. They still don't have a clue as to what is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
23. OWS is rEvolution.
The Tea Party was a bunch of scabs hired by Grover Norquist that got a small following of sheep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC