Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you want to know why Wall Street wasn't prosecuted when they so clearly committed criminal acts..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:05 PM
Original message
If you want to know why Wall Street wasn't prosecuted when they so clearly committed criminal acts..
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/08/business/in-shift-federal-prosecutors-are-lenient-as-companies-break-the-law.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&ref=business">This piece by Gretchen Morgenson and Louise Story in the New York Times is a must read:

As Wall St. Polices Itself, Prosecutors Use Softer Approach

As the financial storm brewed in the summer of 2008 and institutions feared for their survival, a bit of good news bubbled through large banks and the law firms that defend them.

Federal prosecutors officially adopted new guidelines about charging corporations with crimes — a softer approach that, longtime white-collar lawyers and former federal prosecutors say, helps explain the dearth of criminal cases despite a raft of inquiries into the financial crisis.

Though little noticed outside legal circles, the guidelines were welcomed by firms representing banks. The Justice Department’s directive, involving a process known as deferred prosecutions, signaled “an important step away from the more aggressive prosecutorial practices seen in some cases under their predecessors,” Sullivan & Cromwell, a prominent Wall Street law firm, told clients in a memo that September.

The guidelines left open a possibility other than guilty or not guilty, giving leniency often if companies investigated and reported their own wrongdoing. In return, the government could enter into agreements to delay or cancel the prosecution if the companies promised to change their behavior.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/08/business/in-shift-federal-prosecutors-are-lenient-as-companies-break-the-law.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&ref=business">more...


Starting under the Bush administration, our political leaders made a choice to create a second tier of justice for white collar criminals. The Obama administration carried on with this crony kid-glove treatment.

Read the entire article and you will understand why, despite ample evidence and even blatant admissions of wrong-doing, financial sector criminals walked away with billions in stolen money and a slap on the wrist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Laws are for little people--who don't PIF their members of Congress at the time of the purchase
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. +1
indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. Laws are to keep lawyers employed finding ways around them. Corps too big to jail.
Trials and punishment are for little people, because banks and corps already own the best lawyers, and usually going to get off anyway.

It isn't just politics that have failed in America, it's just about everything that money touches.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vets74 Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. COMMON LAW FRAUD is local jurisdiction. Not Federal.
The CDS's are not regulated. Phil Gramm got that done.

Claiming that the Feds should prosecute local jurisdiction crimes ??? Why ?

The two cycles of Dot.com scams were not prosecuted. The mortgage and CDS scams were not prosecuted.

Same difference.

Btw: all the tidy paperwork got done to the tee. Ain't SEC or bank regs. And NYSE is a SRO, don'tcha know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
72. Everyone insists that "obviously!" crimes were committed, but can't actually name them.
Once again: the problem is that deregulation specifically allows this sort of shit. Complaining that the feds supposedly haven't prosecuted crimes, when you can't actually FIND any crimes, is not useful. Demanding increased financial regulation is useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vets74 Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #72
78. Manhattan corruption prevented COMMON LAW FRAUD prosecution. Not deregulation.
That's a myth.

Federal security laws have nothing to do with local, meaning state laws.

And all this was on the books before computers were invented, before Hollerith cards, before the typewriter.

Conspiracy has a 10-year SOL, if you feel up to filing a criminal complaint. If I was a German pension fund... you betcha !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. bookmarked.
Loves me some Gretchen Morgenson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. This Matt Taibbi article spells a lot of it out too...
revolving doors is a huge problem. They're all buddies and they're supposed to regulate each other?

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-isnt-wall-street-in-jail-20110216

Not a single executive who ran the companies that cooked up and cashed in on the phony financial boom — an industrywide scam that involved the mass sale of mismarked, fraudulent mortgage-backed securities — has ever been convicted. Their names by now are familiar to even the most casual Middle American news consumer: companies like AIG, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Morgan Stanley. Most of these firms were directly involved in elaborate fraud and theft. Lehman Brothers hid billions in loans from its investors. Bank of America lied about billions in bonuses. Goldman Sachs failed to tell clients how it put together the born-to-lose toxic mortgage deals it was selling. What's more, many of these companies had corporate chieftains whose actions cost investors billions — from AIG derivatives chief Joe Cassano, who assured investors they would not lose even "one dollar" just months before his unit imploded, to the $263 million in compensation that former Lehman chief Dick "The Gorilla" Fuld conveniently failed to disclose. Yet not one of them has faced time behind bars.

<snip>

But a veritable mountain of evidence indicates that when it comes to Wall Street, the justice system not only sucks at punishing financial criminals, it has actually evolved into a highly effective mechanism for protecting financial criminals. This institutional reality has absolutely nothing to do with politics or ideology — it takes place no matter who's in office or which party's in power. To understand how the machinery functions, you have to start back at least a decade ago, as case after case of financial malfeasance was pursued too slowly or not at all, fumbled by a government bureaucracy that too often is on a first-name basis with its targets. Indeed, the shocking pattern of nonenforcement with regard to Wall Street is so deeply ingrained in Washington that it raises a profound and difficult question about the very nature of our society: whether we have created a class of people whose misdeeds are no longer perceived as crimes, almost no matter what those misdeeds are. The SEC and the Justice Department have evolved into a bizarre species of social surgeon serving this nonjailable class, expert not at administering punishment and justice, but at finding and removing criminal responsibility from the bodies of the accused.


much, much more at link above...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
75. That is a great article and it explains a lot of the atmosphere that surrounded the bailout attitude
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 10:10 PM by Major Hogwash
that they had at the time.
Bush certainly didn't want it to be known that this all happened while he was in the White House.
And Cheney admitted within the last year that they knew that General Motors was in dire straits, but they let it go for the next administration to deal with. I think Bush and Cheney were secretly hoping that McCain would win, and then he would break the UAW by letting GM go under.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Thanks for posting this

Well worth the read!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sadly, we have nobody else to vote for but Obama. Because Cain or Romney are worse.
I can see why the US boasts on average some of the lowest voter turnouts in the industrialized world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. And I'd be willing to bet 2012 will see record low turnouts n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. Yep, and the R's could steal the election because of it...
...I'm guessing Obama won by 30 million in 2008, not the 3 million the machines came up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzledtraveller Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
37. they wont have to steal it if people stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #20
44. They don't have to steal it anyway
They've owned both parties for the last 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R.
Boy have we got lots of work to undo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. poor Gretchen - tool of the wingnuts
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2011/06/09/book_exposes_how_democrats_brought_about_the_financial_crisis


Book Exposes How Democrats Brought About the Financial Crisis

Folks, there's a new book out, been brought to my attention. I just downloaded it, my iPad on I books. I'm gonna start reading it this afternoon. The book is entitled "Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed, and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon," and it's by Gretchen Morgenson (who is an economics writer/business writer to the New York Times) and noted financial analyst Joshua Rosner. And this book apparently is a cover-to-cover indictment of Wall Street and the Democrat Party, Fannie Mae and subprime mortgages. This book answers the question that the American people have: Who is responsible for this debacle?


I can link you to her interviews with the wingnuts if you don't yet believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Attack the messenger = tactical fail.
Last ditch effort from one who is incapable of addressing the substance of the article.

You posted a link to some commentary from Rush Limbaugh, who clearly stated that he had not even read the book, but he believed it would make Obama look bad. And this is supposed to be an indictment of Morgenson?

Yes, please link to as many interviews with Gretchen Morgenson as you can. She is an excellent investigative reporter covering the financial beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Here she is blaming Democrats for the mortgage crisis on Fox News
Edited on Mon Oct-17-11 05:11 PM by banned from Kos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FXU-B-WanQ

(Morgenson at 2:28)

She deserves no respect as she enables the lies of Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Morgenson gave a good interview, thanks for posting.
Many Democrats do deserve blame for their part in exacerbating the crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
38. You can link to a particular time in a youtube clip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. LOL, she's "excellent" because she's going after democrats. try harder next time. you can do better.
this shit is rather transparent by now....

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
36. Hold on, Hoss. You're going to take Rush Limbaugh talking about a book he hasn't even...
read yet as the authoritative guide to the content of the book?

Any book on the topic of the financial crisis is going to boil down to the democrats being to blame according to him! Furthermore any analysis which casts some culpablity on regulatory agencies as well as the banks is going to be selectively quoted to make the regulators look like the main culprits. That's what having no intellectual integrity is all about, and we know that's Limbaugh's MO, so you know he adds nothing but smoke to this conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
58. Yes, Rush actually reading the book is irrelevant. Her going on his show
so they can blame Democrats for the 2003-2008 mortgage crisis is the "tool" part.

The wingnuts used her and she willfully went along (to sell books).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
50. delete- wrong place
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 01:50 PM by chill_wind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. ..because the feds are more interested in arresting pot smoking cancer grannies?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
73. in all fairness
online poker has been a high priority as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Didn't someone say that no crimes had been committed: it's a no-brainer, if no crime, no prosecution
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. "'second tier'"? Bush took away the entire FBI white collar crime policing.
What's with this softball second tier crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
18. ^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
19. Obama said no one broke the law! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. No he didn't. Why do DUers make shit up about Obama?
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 09:48 AM by Nye Bevan
I would expect that on RW sites, but not here. I'm generally dismissive about claims regarding troll infestation but posts like this make me wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SfromCanada Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. They didn't break the law.
They "acted irresponsibly" according to Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. If Obama believes a law was broken, it's his DUTY to order Justice to prosecute.
So, logically, either Obama is deficient in his duty, or else he doesn't believe any laws were broken. QED. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. TARP Bank FRAUD: Two Senior Execs Indicted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. We were discussing conduct that PRECEDED TARP, weren't we? Why change subject?
Looking forward? :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #28
31.  Bear Stearns Executives Ralph Cioffi, Matthew Tannin Indicted
Two former Bear Stearns managers have been arrested, federal authorities said Thursday, becoming the first executives to face criminal charges in the wake of the subprime market debacle.

Matthew Tannin was taken into custody outside his New Jersey home on Thursday morning and Ralph Cioffi was arrested at his New York City home, the FBI said.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/19/bear-stearns-executives-r_n_107996.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Obama wasn't President in 2008. Are you confused, or am *I*?
Another subject change? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Ex-Credit Suisse Broker Butler Gets Five-Year Prison Sentence
Jan. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Former Credit Suisse Group AG broker Eric Butler was sentenced to five years in prison for fraudulently selling subprime securities to corporate clients that cost investors more than $1.1 billion in losses.

Butler was found guilty in August after a three-week trial in federal court in Brooklyn, New York. Butler, convicted of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, securities fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, faced a maximum sentence of 45 years in prison, prosecutors said.

“I deeply regret that my actions brought me here before this court,” said Butler, wiping tears from his face just before the sentence was imposed yesterday.

“I was a bond salesman, I purchased AAA-rated securities and my belief was that those securities were infallible,” Butler said. “In my career I had never experienced a failed auction,” he said. “I had faith in the market and I invested client’s money in what I truly believe was the safest product.”


http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ao3g1KEa21x4

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. "Butler and Julian Tzolov were indicted in 2008"
:rofl: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
48. Google failed ya, huh?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #48
60. Third time's the cha-- oh, no, it isn't, after all.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. Then what did he say??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. The onus is on the DUer who made the false claim to prove that Obama *did* say what he claimed.
Of course, since Obama never said that, we are in for a long wait......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #33
41. Here you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Sorry, I couldn't find where Obama said "no-one broke the law".
Perhaps you meant to post a different link?

Or did Obama never actually say "no-one broke the law"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. here
THE PRESIDENT: Well, first on the issue of prosecutions on Wall Street, one of the biggest problems about the collapse of Lehmans and the subsequent financial crisis and the whole subprime lending fiasco is that a lot of that stuff wasn’t necessarily illegal, it was just immoral or inappropriate or reckless. That’s exactly why we needed to pass Dodd-Frank, to prohibit some of these practices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. I read your quote a few times and I didn't see "no-one broke the law". (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. I didn't put "no one broke the law" in quotations, like you did. Talk about a freeperish tactic!
I gave a summary of the meaning of what he said.

Nice try though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. Not as freeperish as trying to make Obama look bad by making stuff up that he never said!
There are plenty of other websites for that kind of thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. I didn't make Obama look bad. You did though! and yourself too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
40. Why are you talking to Ignored?
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 11:00 AM by L0oniX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzledtraveller Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
39. infact their failures were rewarded with bailouts..
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 10:58 AM by Puzzledtraveller
you can argue that the corporations and banks that benefitted are pro government intervention, who else would have saved them? You may say the taxpayers, yes, by proxy of the government. I don't recall anyone asking me if I thought these corporations and banks needed or deserved a bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
29. K&R for now. Bookmarking for later.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
45. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngkorWot Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
46. "so clearly committed criminal acts"
Could I get a specific name of a perpetrator, a specific crime, and evidence that they committed the crime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. This should help you get started in your research:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngkorWot Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. Not really interested.
Just wondering if it was really all as clear as you said it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. it is VERY clear to any thinking person
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
51. The justice department document cited either exists or it doesn't.
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 02:02 PM by chill_wind
It's linked in the piece. Which is the point of the piece. All the people spinning their wheels and railing against messengers as usual can download and read it. Or not. They can just distract and disingenuously pretend it's not even there. But it is.

Here's the thrust:

"In certain instances, it may be appropriate, upon consideration of the factors set forth herein, to resolve a corporate criminal case by means other than indictment. Non-prosecution and deferred prosecution agreements, for example, occupy an important middle ground between declining prosecution and obtaining the conviction of a corporation. These agreements are discussed further in Section X, infra. Likewise, civil and regulatory alternatives may be appropriate in certain cases, as discussed in Section XI, infra."

K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. The FBI opened over 500 investigations into financial crisis related fraud.
Which would seem to indicate that they believed a significant number of crimes had been committed.

"The FBI has more than 530 open corporate fraud investigations, including 38 corporate fraud and financial institution matters directly related to the current financial crisis," Pistole told the Senate Judiciary Committee today.

The 38 companies, he said, "are significantly large companies, businesses everyone knows about but I cannot comment publicly."

Pistole's comments suggested widespread criminal activity among many of the nation's corporate giants.

The amount of corporate fraud "dwarfs" the Savings and Loan scandal of the 1980s, Pistole told the committee.

"I don't think we've paid enough attention to the mortgage and financial fraud that have so dramatically contributed to the economic downturn," Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said. "It is now becoming clear that unscrupulous mortgage brokers and Wall Street financiers were among the principal contributors to this economic collapse."

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/Economy/story?id=6855179&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. They. Knew. FBI's hair on fire as far back as 2004
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 03:18 PM by chill_wind
FBI warns of mortgage fraud 'epidemic'

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/09/17/mortgage.fraud/

Bill Black has hammered on that fact since forever.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-k-black/the-two-documents-everyon_b_169813.html

Now we know, thanks to guys like Alan Grayson explaining in "Fraud Factories" just how pervasive and epidemic so much of that was.

Somebody up high had to eventually "do something."



DU props:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2137812#top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #54
62. And here are the results...
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 07:38 PM by dkf

Operation Stolen Dreams
Hundreds Arrested in Mortgage Fraud Sweep

06/17/10

From industry insiders to straw buyers, nearly 500 people have been arrested in a nationwide mortgage fraud takedown that reflects the coordinated efforts of law enforcement to address the growing problem of crime in the housing industry.

“Mortgage fraud ruins lives, destroys families, and devastates whole communities,” Attorney General Eric Holder said this morning at a press conference to announce the results of “Operation Stolen Dreams.” Launched on March 1, 2010, the multi-agency initiative has led to a total of 485 arrests. More than 330 convictions have been obtained, and nearly $11 million has been recovered. Losses from a variety of fraud schemes are estimated to exceed $2 billion.

Operation Stolen Dreams is the government’s largest mortgage fraud takedown to date. But FBI Director Robert S. Mueller cautioned that there is still much work to be done. The Bureau is currently pursuing more than 3,000 mortgage fraud cases, he said, which is almost double the number from the last fiscal year.

“The staggering totals from this sweep highlight the mortgage fraud trends we are seeing around the country,” Attorney General Holder said. “We have seen mortgage fraud take on all shapes and sizes—from schemes that ensnared the elderly to fraudsters who targeted immigrant communities.”

http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2010/june/mortgage-fraud-sweep

On edit..oops wrong FBI program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #54
63. Connecticut Real Estate Brokerage Employee Sentenced for Mortgage Fraud
BY MOE BEDARD ON OCTOBER 18, 2011 IN SCAMS


(Source: FBI) – David B. Fein, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, announced that ANDREA J. PALMUCCI, 50, of East Haven, was sentenced today by United States District Judge Christopher F. Droney in Hartford to two years of probation, the first eight months of which PALMUCCI must spend in home confinement, for participating in a mortgage fraud scheme in New Haven County. Judge Droney also ordered PALMUCCI to perform 200 hours of community service.

According to court documents and statements made in court, PALMUCCI was employed by ATZ Realty, located at 612 Main Street in East Haven, which was owned and operated by Abdelghany Antar. From June 2006 to October 2007, Antar and PALMUCCI conspired to purchase 11 properties in New Haven County in PALMUCCI’s name. As part of the conspiracy, Antar and PALMUCCI made false statements to various mortgage lenders, including statements about PALMUCCI’s income, assets, liabilities, employment, and intention to occupy the home as a primary residence. In addition, the deposits and down payments for the properties were paid out of bank accounts in PALMUCCI’s name with funds owned and controlled by Antar. After the closings, PALMUCCI quitclaimed the properties back to Antar or to entities that Antar owned or controlled. Antar paid PALMUCCI a few thousand dollars for each home she purchased.

Through this scheme, Antar and PALMUCCI obtained approximately $2.759 million in fraudulent mortgages. All of the properties they purchased have been foreclosed on, or are currently in foreclosure.

http://www.loansafe.org/connecticut-real-estate-brokerage-employee-sentenced-for-mortgage-fraud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. 2 years probation, 200 hrs of community service
and eight months of home confinement is the price Palmucci will pay. Martha Stewart went away for longer than that.

At least Antar got three years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. Trumbull Man Admits Mortgage Fraud
According to a press release, Maurizio Lancia, 48, of Trumbull, pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud, and Stacey Petro, also known as Stacey Moises, 37, of Branford, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud.

According to court documents and statements made in court, Lancia, a licensed attorney and licensed mortgage broker, controlled and operated Royal Financial Services, LLC, and Petro, a licensed mortgage broker, controlled and operated First Source Mortgage Solutions, Inc. From approximately 2004 to 2007, Lancia, Petro, Jose Guzman, William Athan and others used these and other mortgage brokerage companies, as well as property management and home improvement companies, to arrange for individuals (“borrowers”) to purchase real estate, primarily residential housing properties located in New London Country, by obtaining funding from various mortgage companies and mortgage originators after submitting false information on the borrowers’ mortgage loan applications.

The fraudulent information included information regarding income, assets, employment, rent history, as well as the borrowers’ intention to make the properties their primary residence. The borrowers, who typically were individuals who had good credit but were of modest means with low levels of income, were compensated for participating in the scheme.

In 2004, Lancia, Guzman and Athan purchased a property at 349-351 Broad St. in New London and formed Broad Street Investment Group for the purpose of buying and selling properties.  Both Royal Financial Services, LLC and First Source Mortgage Solutions, Inc. operated out of 349-351 Broad St.

http://trumbull.patch.com/articles/trumbull-man-admits-mortgage-fraud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. What is the sentencing?
It still awaits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #68
76. Guess so. This is an interesting site...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #54
65. Utah Couple Who Targeted For Sale By Owners Charged With Mortgage Fraud
(Source: FBI) UTAH COUNTY— A federal grand jury returned an eight-count indictment Wednesday afternoon charging Portia R. Louder, age 40, and Chad Louder, age 41, both of Highland, with criminal violations of federal law in connection with what the indictment alleges was a scheme to profit from loans fraudulently obtained from mortgage lenders.

Portia R. Louder is charged in the indictment with three counts of false statements to financial institutions; three counts of wire fraud; and one count of money laundering. Chad Louder is charged with two counts of false statements to financial institutions.

“Prosecuting mortgage fraud cases continues to be a priority in our office. It’s a problem that has cost banks, borrowers, and homeowners in Utah tens of millions of dollars. As today’s indictment demonstrates, we will continue to aggressively prosecute those individuals we believe have exploited the mortgage and real estate process for their own personal gain,” Acting U.S. Attorney Carlie Christensen said.

“Multi-million-dollar schemes, such as the one alleged in today’s indictment, contributed to the collapse of the housing market. The FBI is committed to investigating this type of egregious fraud. This indictment charging the Louders alleges they fraudulently obtained millions of dollars by providing false information to lenders, sellers, and others. Through the hard work of the FBI, the IRS, the United States Attorney’s Office, and others who have contributed to the investigation, this couple now faces serious federal charges,” FBI Special Agent in Charge David J. Johnson said.

http://www.loansafe.org/utah-couple-who-targeted-for-sale-by-owners-charged-with-mortgage-fraud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. Again, where is the sentencing yet? This thread is not about the existence of investigations
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 10:16 PM by chill_wind
or the diligence even of the FBI. Although that's probably another whole subject for another day. It's about what comes or not of the investigations, arrests and indictments, but especially about the choices about prosecutions or not of large corporations especially. Already amply noted that the FBI has known it's had this raging epidemic of mom and pop fraud on their hands, along with much bigger entities. For years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #54
66.    East Haven Woman Who Participated in Mortgage Fraud Scheme is Sentenced
David B Fein, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, announced that ANDREA J PALMUCCI, 50, of East Haven, was sentenced today by United States District Judge Christopher F Droney in Hartford to two years of probation, the first eight months of which PALMUCCI must spend in home confinement, for participating in a mortgage fraud scheme in New Haven County. Judge Droney also ordered PALMUCCI to perform 200 hours of community service.

According to court documents and statements made in court, PALMUCCI was employed by ATZ Realty, located at 612 Main Street in East Haven, which was owned and operated by Abdelghany Antar. From June 2006 to October 2007, Antar and PALMUCCI conspired to purchase 11 properties in New Haven County in PALMUCCI’s name. As part of the conspiracy, Antar and PALMUCCI made false statements to various mortgage lenders, including statements about PALMUCCI’s income, assets, liabilities, employment, and intention to occupy the home as a primary residence.

In addition, the deposits and down payments for the properties were paid out of bank accounts in PALMUCCI’s name with funds owned and controlled by Antar. After the closings, PALMUCCI quitclaimed the properties back to Antar or to entities that Antar owned or controlled. Antar paid PALMUCCI a few thousand dollars for each home she purchased.

Through this scheme, Antar and PALMUCCI obtained approximately $2.759 million in fraudulent mortgages. All of the properties they purchased have been foreclosed on, or are currently in foreclosure.

http://7thspace.com/headlines/397144/east_haven_woman_who_participated_in_mortgage_fraud_scheme_is_sentenced.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. Isn't this a dupe of the same Antar and Palmucci case above? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #54
77. And other point of fact to reinforce what you're saying- FHFA was aware of procedural
fraud going on routinely for years. Aware as far back as 2003. YEARS!

Inspector General: FHFA Was Aware of Robo-Signing and Other Abuses

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=2072809&mesg_id=2072809


(pdf)
http://www.fhfaoig.gov/Content/Files/AUD-2011-004.pdf


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
53. THANK YOU!!!! This story was on NPR, I could never get the link....fuckin Bush admin was horrible!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dd2003 Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
69. Banks ruin lives and no one even arrested
Some mary jane helps relieve stress and pain and people are serving life sentances
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
74. Were RICO laws violated?
Because evidently the federal government doesn't see it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
79. The REAGAN administration prosecuted HUNDREDS in the wake
of the S&L scandal.

It seems incredibly curious that no one was touched following the near-collapse of our economy in 2008, and this goes a long way to explain why.

K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC