Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canada’s role in Gadhafi’s fall

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-11 07:59 PM
Original message
Canada’s role in Gadhafi’s fall
But the trail to Gadhafi’s last stand was a long and twisting one, leading through Rwanda, Bosnia, Kosovo — and Ottawa.

Gadhafi’s fall followed a seven-month NATO bombing campaign that was the first internationally authorized use of force to protect civilians, a doctrine known as R2P, or responsibility to protect. And it marks the 10th anniversary of the Canadian-backed report on humanitarian intervention that created a framework for protecting civilians in peril and changed the way we think about the once-sacred concept of national sovereignty.

It was the bloodshed, ethnic cleansing and genocide of the 1990s that shocked the international community out of its centuries-old conviction that sovereign states could do as they pleased with their people. The world seemed ready for change, and Canada took the lead.

“Back in the mid 1990s we adopted human security as the basis of our foreign policy,” says then foreign minister Lloyd Axworthy, now president of the University of Winnipeg. “We were elected to the UN Security Council on a platform of protection for civilians.”

Canada was not alone in challenging the age-old notion of ironclad sovereignty. Other scholars and diplomats had laid the groundwork, and then UN secretary-general Kofi Annan touched off a fierce debate on sovereignty vs. human rights. But it was Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic’s attacks on the Albanian population of the southern province of Kosovo in 1998 that tipped the balance, says Axworthy.

http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1074444
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-11 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-11 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. R2P is going to change the world.
The ironic part is that R2P is a decidedly leftist, progressive, position, and internationalist at its core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-11 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. +1...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not too surprising since Canada was a driving force behind it.
http://www.international.gc.ca/glynberry/protect-resp-proteger.aspx?lang=eng&view=d

Responsibility to Protect

The concept of the Responsibility to Protect was developed in response to the genocide in Rwanda and the deliberate targeting of civilians in Kosovo and Srebrenica. Since these crises, a series of governmental and non-governmental initiatives have focused on reconciling traditional notions of state sovereignty with the moral imperative to act -- with force if necessary -- in the face of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Canada launched the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty in 2000 with a mandate to tackle this issue, and has promoted its landmark report, entitled The Responsibility to Protect, as a valuable framework for building international consensus around the legitimate use of force to halt large-scale attacks on civilians.

Canada advocated strongly for world leaders to endorse Responsibility to Protect principles at the 2005 World Summit, and views their inclusion in the World Summit Outcome Document as a major achievement of the Summit.

The Outcome Document represents the first global consensus on the responsibility of individual states and of the international community to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. Most importantly, it affirms the international community’s willingness to take timely and decisive action, through the Security Council, when peaceful means prove inadequate and national authorities are manifestly failing to protect their populations from such acts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. And world leaders seem somewhat more afraid on committing genocide. When the fight
heated up in Darfur last year George Clooney stated publically that sattelite cameras would be focussed on Darfur and it worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. End genocide. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC