|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:13 PM Original message |
DADT or START? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. DADT, and then START if there's time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. START needs 67 votes in the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. DADT first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
20. "Very good" You are that sure there are 14 Republicans that will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. The House would have to pass DADT next year but wouldn't have to pass START |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:18 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. List 14 Senators that will vote for START |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:25 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. All of the following |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:19 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Why did many vote against cloture? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Reid is now saying there may not be a vote on DADT repeal before Christmas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. DADT--because START will get through eventually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alex cross (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. A treaty that could possibly affect every man, woman and child |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FailureToCommunicate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I'd argue on civil rights, but you're correct: nuked is nuked. Trumps everything else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Only for someone like you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. START is not "political theatre" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Both bills affect everybody. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. 2%? and DADT effects every American n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. Neither. The republicans will not allow any foreign policy achievements and certainly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
7. I still miss my favorite spoonful of alphabet soup, EFCA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushisanidiot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
9. DADT MUST be passed now! START will pass next year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. As you are so sure - please list the 14 Republican Senators you think will vote for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustAnotherGen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
10. I'll hope for DADT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
11. DADT must be done now. START will have to wait. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
13. Isn't this the same old false dilemma we're offered, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats_win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
16. START and then institute DADT for heterosexuals too. End the wars! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCheese (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
17. DADT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
18. START would have a fighting chance in the new Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Can you list 14 Republican Senators next year that would vote for it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC