Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT Saturday editorial: DOMA is 'shameful discrimination'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 10:44 PM
Original message
NYT Saturday editorial: DOMA is 'shameful discrimination'
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/05/opinion/edging-toward-equality.html

On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee began consideration of a measure that would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, the deplorable 1996 law that bars federal recognition of same-sex marriages and denies lawfully married same-sex couples benefits granted other married couples, including Social Security survivor payments and unpaid leave to care for a seriously ill spouse.

The need for repeal has long been clear and is made more obvious by a new federal lawsuit filed on behalf of eight active and retired gay and lesbian service members. The suit — one of several cases challenging the constitutionality of the law — shows the incoherence and unjustness of federal policy.

... The discussion in the committee was curtailed when the ranking Republican member, Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, invoked a procedural rule to put off the full debate and vote in the committee until its next business meeting on Thursday. The repeal bill still stands a very good chance of passing in the committee, with all 10 Democrats voting in favor and all eight Republicans opposed. But mustering the 60 votes needed to overcome an expected Republican-led filibuster on the Senate floor will be an uphill struggle.

... Still, the Judiciary Committee’s renunciation of the Defense of Marriage Act would be a real advance — one that reflects the public’s growing rejection of this shameful discrimination and moves Congress a step closer to correcting it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
markpkessinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great editorial -- prompted me to remind myself why Clinton signed it...
... and his statement is every bit as hollow and indefensible today as it was 15 years ago:

President's statement on DOMA


Statement by President Bill Clinton

On Friday, September 20, prior to signing the Defense of Marriage Act, President Clinton released the following statement:

Throughout my life I have strenuously opposed discrimination of any kind, including discrimination against gay and lesbian Americans. I am signing into law H.R. 3396, a bill relating to same-gender marriage, but it is important to note what this legislation does and does not do.

I have long opposed governmental recognition of same-gender marriages and this legislation is consistent with that position. The Act confirms the right of each state to determine its own policy with respect to same gender marriage and clarifies for purposes of federal law the operative meaning of the terms "marriage" and "spouse".

This legislation does not reach beyond those two provisions. It has no effect on any current federal, state or local anti-discrimination law and does not constrain the right of Congress or any state or locality to enact anti-discrimination laws. I therefore would take this opportunity to urge Congress to pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, an act which would extend employment discrimination protections to gays and lesbians in the workplace. This year the Senate considered this legislation contemporaneously with the Act I sign today and failed to pass it by a single vote. I hope that in its next Session Congress will pass it expeditiously.

I also want to make clear to all that the enactment of this legislation should not, despite the fierce and at times divisive rhetoric surrounding it, be understood to provide an excuse for discrimination, violence or intimidation against any person on the basis of sexual orientation. Discrimination, violence and intimidation for that reason, as well as others, violate the principle of equal protection under the law and have no place in American society.


The last paragraph is a real kicker considering that the bill he was signing, by its very terms, was discriminatory.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC