|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:42 PM Original message |
Wowzer. Is this ever stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. You mean he is going to make them read the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. Mentally deranged..every single repuke...in Congress and out.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. One comes up with a hare brained idea and the rest go along |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Almost as gutless as most of the dems these days... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unlawflcombatnt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 04:20 AM Response to Reply #19 |
45. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. Gee. I wonder which interpretation of the Constitution they will take. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. The St. Ronnie version? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. Hmmm. I think they should appoint Sharron Angle. She knows what the Founding Faithers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yes, stupid. So, what's new? Delay Delay Delay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. True, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:16 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Right, I know that, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
37. They don't intend to do anything. They CAN'T do anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. The Constitution is not that long..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grilled onions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
7. Think We Might Benefit More If They Read The Manual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. Constitutional as interpretted by whom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. It just gives them another tool to control legislation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
11. Finding the Founding Fathers UnAmerican in 3....2....1 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
12. It had to be some asshole from Utah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
13. As long as it applies to their own crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
14. "it's not long?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Wha? There's no Reader's Digest version of all that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. He has no idea that case law is just as much a part of the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onethatcares (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 05:32 AM Response to Reply #14 |
49. they've also never read a Camry manual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
17. There goes the gun owners' rights. Unless they stick only to muskets. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
21. in theory i like this idea, but yes, in practice, it's pointlessly stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
22. Hmmm, since the USSC is supposed to be the final arbiter on what is or is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
25. Many right wingers consider social security, unemployment, and other programs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. and Federal income tax, for that matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:38 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. No, it would just required going back to property based tax systems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. And there are many instances where the programs in fact were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 04:30 AM Response to Reply #25 |
46. That's called "strict constructionism" and is as useful to a living Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
26. I think that rule may be unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mstinamotorcity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
28. F--K the Constitution!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puzzler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
29. Er... I thought ALL new legislation was supposed to be constitutional... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
31. Who's going to judge if a Bill passes "constitutional" muster? These guys? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sonoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:07 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Is that the 5th Circuit panel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:16 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. The Good Ol' Boys in Richmond have 'em beat. You don't want to end up in the 4th. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sonoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:18 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Damn, that picture is almost enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Real men wear hats while they're working. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 04:31 AM Response to Reply #40 |
47. That is one GIANT-ass leaf. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 05:03 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Do farmers grow in the ground? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
32. I predict that the 112th congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:04 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. . . . and ungrammatical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
35. What about all those constitutional amendments that they want to change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
COLGATE4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
41. Yep. All that silliness about having to study your ass off for at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
42. The US Constitution isn't that long, but it is a solid piece of work. The Camry isn't long either, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
43. So they want to displace the Supreme Court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 04:10 AM Response to Original message |
44. I dunno about that. The Constitution says that only Congress has the power to declare war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC