Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Occupy San Diego Sues the City

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 11:51 AM
Original message
Occupy San Diego Sues the City
Occupy San Diego Sues the City



SAN DIEGO (CN) - Three Occupy San Diego protesters say the city is selectively enforcing a law that prohibits people from placing "any object" on public property.

Their attorney told Courthouse News her clients object to the city's "arbitrary and overboard" enforcement of the law, which the city is using as an "intimidation tactic."

The federal complaint cites San Diego Municipal Code section 54.01.10, which bans "unauthorized encroachments" and makes it illegal to place "any object" on public property, which includes streets, alleys, sidewalks and highways.

"The legislative history of this ordinance is that it was enacted to prevent encroachment of Dumpsters in alleyways," but the city is using it to ban protests in Civic Center Plaza, the protesters say. They want the law declared "void for vagueness," and a violation of the 1st Amendment.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/18/41564.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. A human could be an object.
"WordNet 3.0 (En-En) object I noun 1. a tangible and visible entity; an entity that can cast a shadow (Freq. 51)"

So, the general public cannot place their babies or themselves on public property, but there's no problem with "the people" putting buildings, concrete, etc. on it.

Hypocrisy supreme!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. "public" property - what part of public do they not understand? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Have a "picnic protest"
Just have everyone gather for lunch some afternoon.

We're not protesting, were 'picnicking'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC