Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State Police seize $20,000 in alleged drug money from car on I-12, release driver and passenger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Flora Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 09:55 AM
Original message
State Police seize $20,000 in alleged drug money from car on I-12, release driver and passenger
Where was the crime if the police let the suspects and vehicle go? On what grounds were the police able to confiscate the cash?

State Police seized $20,000 in alleged drug money from a vehicle on Interstate 12 on Thursday but released the two occupants after they said the cash did not belong to them.

During the traffic stop, the trooper noticed Eaglin and White seemed nervous and gave inconsistent answers when asked why they were traveling, Manale said. The trooper asked to search the vehicle and Eaglin, the driver, refused, he said.

Troopers then requested assistance from the St. Tammany Parish Sheriff's Office, which sent a police dog to search for drugs in the car, Manale said. The dog picked up on the scent of drugs in the vehicle, he said.

Troopers did not find drugs in the car but did turn up $20,000 in cash in the trunk, he said.

Eaglin and White were taken to Troop L's headquarters near Mandeville for questioning and both denied ownership of the money, Manale said. Troopers seized the cash and released both Eaglin and White with their vehicle, he said.

State Police have not yet sought any charges against Eaglin or White.


link to full article; http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2011/01/state_police_seize_20000_in_al.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, let's see......
....the dogs alerted to drugs, so they were present at some time. They find $20K cash in the trunk, but neither occupant in the car would claim it. How many cars have $20K in cash in the trunk, and of those, how many do it legally without the car's occupants knowledge? I'm afraid we're approaching zero here. So, I believe the police were correct in confiscating the cash until the rightful owners claim it.

If the cash was legit, then the rightful owners can claim it at any time. What's wrong with that? If it is drug money, no one is going to claim it. If it's not, it stands to reason they would, right? The police were just using common sense, IMO.

What grounds? Reasonable cause to suspect the cash was illegal drug money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flora Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I do see your point, but.. (there's always a but)
I just find it somewhat akin to a slippery slop when police officers can seize any property without clear evidence of a crime. And yes, the dogs did pick up on the scent of drugs, but I think that eventually all currency has traces of drug scent.

And yes, I do believe the money was related to drug traffic, but I'm just uneasy with this scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why?
You can't fly anywhere commercially with that kind of cash. If it were legit, it could be transferred bank to bank electronically without the risk of confiscation. All logic says this money is illegal. The occupants refused a search, which is certainly their right, but their actions were suspicious enough to warrant the use of a search dog who alerted to the trunk area, which yielded the money. And, for the occupants not to claim it? I would say that would send the suspicion meter off the charts!

What's to be uneasy about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Those in physical possession of the cash were either unable, or unwilling...
...to provide the cash's provenance. This was a fair use of the law.

However. you are right to worry. The problem is the ease with which it can be used unfairly. Your blacksheep adult kid tosses a largish bag of weed in the attic. Your property = Your weed = You lose.

And there are plenty of other even more egregious examples of "sanctioned" theft.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech9413 Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's called asset forfeiture laws
That's how pd's help fund their operation. You don't have to be charged with a crime for them to keep your property or cash. Do a little research and you'll find out how common it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC