Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Republicans Plan to Force California Into Bankruptcy to Bust Unions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
wikileaksfan Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 08:56 PM
Original message
House Republicans Plan to Force California Into Bankruptcy to Bust Unions
House Republicans Plan to Force California Into Bankruptcy to Bust Unions
by: Robert Cruickshank
Fri Dec 17, 2010 at 13:30:00 PM PST

"If you've been reading Calitics for any length of time, you know that one of the things we often point out is that California cannot go bankrupt. Our constitution mandates bondholders be repaid before any other expenditure aside from K-12 schools. And a federal law passed in 1937 to stop Arkansas from going bankrupt ensures that while city and county governments (like Vallejo and Orange County) can declare bankruptcy, states cannot.
But that could be about to change if House Republicans get their way, according to a recent Reuters article:

Congressional Republicans appear to be quietly but methodically executing a plan that would a) avoid a federal bailout of spendthrift states and b) cripple public employee unions by pushing cash-strapped states such as California and Illinois to declare bankruptcy. This may be the biggest political battle in Washington, my Capitol Hill sources tell me, of 2011....
Republicans in the House of Representatives already want to stop state and local governments from issuing tax-exempt bonds unless they are more forthright about these future obligations. Republican Representatives Devin Nunes and Darrell Issa of California and Paul Ryan of Wisconsin have introduced a bill that would require state and local governments to estimate the size of public pension liabilities if their assets earned a more conservative rate of return than many plans currently expect. Failure to do so would result in the suspension of their ability to issue tax-exempt bonds.

Reuters cites a Weekly Standard article that laid out the endgame - by changing the law to allow state bankruptcies, and then forcing states to go bankrupt by cutting their funding and undermining their ability to borrow, states would be able to reopen contracts with public employees. Not only could wages and benefits then be cut for current workers, but pension benefits for retired workers would also become fair game for cuts, as has happened with retired auto workers and others whose private sector pensions have been slashed after corporate bankruptcies."

<http://calitics.com/diary/12949/house-republicans-plan-to-force-california-into-bankruptcy-to-bust-unions>

It sure would be great if the west coast could secede from the union!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. WA state's governor (D) proposed
budget cuts because there is a deficit - health and education programs.
The R's are blaming this on regulations and UNIONS. Looks like a concerted effort is underway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech9413 Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. A concerted effort has been underway for 3 decades or more
Republicans fought against the New Deal since before it started. Now they have a big opening to tear it down (thanks to the 2% cut cut on employee contribution). Cutting contributions to SSI doesn't do shit for cutting the debt or deficit. One thing it does do in consideration to the debt/deficit problem is to open a hole for tearing down SSI as a viable program.

Anyone who can do math can figure out that SSI can be self sustainable and is self supported. It doesn't contribute to the deficit one iota! If there are problems with balance, they can be be fixed real easy by balancing funds or adjusting limits.

Putting SSI into the discussion of debt/deficit is pure hogwash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AC_Mem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. If one republican can stop anything from getting done in 2010
Why wouldn't the democrats stop this kind of foolishness from passing with the new congress?

Apparently it only takes one Senator to say no to halt any kind of governing - so Democrats - stop this from happening. Use the repug way to protect Americans instead of corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC