Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court won't hold 'Don't ask, don't tell' lawsuit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 04:35 PM
Original message
Court won't hold 'Don't ask, don't tell' lawsuit
Court won't hold 'Don't ask, don't tell' lawsuit

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A federal appeals court has denied the government's request to suspend a lawsuit challenging the military's ban on openly gay servicemembers.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco issued an order Friday requiring the Department of Justice to file papers by Feb. 25 arguing why the court should overturn a Southern California trial judge who declared the "don't ask, don't tell" policy unconstitutional.

Government lawyers asked the 9th Circuit earlier this month to set aside the case because the Pentagon is moving quickly to satisfy the steps Congress outlined last month when it voted to allow the ban's repeal.

The appeals court did not explain in its order why it rejected the request.

http://www.news10.net/news/story.aspx?storyid=120304&catid=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ok how can there still be a lawsuit
when the law has already been repealed? That makes no sense what so ever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The law gives military significant latitude in implementing the repeal.
Knowing the military they will ask for 3-6 months (which always mean 6 months). Then say they aren't ready pushing it back another 3-6 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The law is still in force right now and in fact there is no date certain by which it will not exist
The challenge of the lawsuit goes to the Constitutionality of the existing law. The "repeal" is contingent and if-come. Do we consider other people's basic rights conditional? I should hope not. So of course the lawsuit already in progress against a discriminatory law must be allowed to continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC