Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Move to cut jobless benefits in FL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:50 PM
Original message
Move to cut jobless benefits in FL


http://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/os-jobless-benefits-law-20110204,0,7259664.story

"Bills filed in the Florida House and Senate seek to cut unemployment costs by reducing the length of time people can receive payments, making it easier for businesses to challenge a worker's claim and pushing people to accept lower-paying work after they'd been on unemployment for 12 weeks or more.

The House bill calls for cutting state unemployment benefits from 26 to 20 weeks. It would not affect the federal jobless program that kicks in after a claimant exhausts state benefits. The federal program offers a maximum of 73 extra weeks, although not everyone receives that much.

The bill would also require applicants to complete a job-skills assessment, reduce the tax employers now pay to fund unemployment and tie the length of benefits to the jobless rate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. hey tea-baggers how is that governor working out for you
:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's not just him, it's the state legislature.
At least when Gov. Crist was in office he would veto their crap bills. Now that he's gone there is absolutely no check-and-balances in place. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. so they just shuffle people from one line (UI) to another - welfare
Have every person in government lost their rabbit-assed minds? Do they expect those people they cut off to just disappear?

It's NOT going to cut costs. And it might cause them more trouble than they want, especially the next time they want to be voted back into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The republicans attitude here is if you are jobless you're a bum
and deserve to live in the woods.

The democratic party down here is in shambles with no message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. sounds a lot like Georgia
They think the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. not so easy to get welfare. you have to have kids, for starters.
Edited on Sat Feb-05-11 11:33 PM by Hannah Bell
The purposes of the TANF program as described in section 601 of the Social Security Act are as follows:

1.provide assistance to needy families so that children may be cared for in their own homes or in the homes of relatives;
2.end the dependence of needy parents on government benefits by promoting job preparation, work, and marriage;
3.prevent and reduce the incidence of out-of-wedlock pregnancies and establish annual numerical goals for preventing and reducing the incidence of these pregnancies; and
4.encourage the formation and maintenance of two-parent families.

TANF sets forward the following work requirements necessary for benefits:

1.Recipients (with few exceptions) must work as soon as they are job ready or no later than two years after coming on assistance.
2.Single parents are required to participate in work activities for at least 30 hours per week. Two-parent families must participate in work activities 35 or 55 hours a week, depending upon circumstances.
3.Failure to participate in work requirements can result in a reduction or termination of benefits to the family.
4.States, in FY 2004, have to ensure that 50 percent of all families and 90 percent of two-parent families are participating in work activities. If a state reduces its caseload, without restricting eligibility, it can receive a caseload reduction credit. This credit reduces the minimum participation rates the state must achieve.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TANF

"participate in work activities" = take their classes & do apps.

i briefly taught in a tanf program. some of the clients were driving 60 miles round-trip in their beater cars, over a mountain, icy in the winter. it was ridiculous.

when people complained about the onerous requirements, we were supposed to tell them "If you were employed, you'd have to find a way to get to work, & this is no different."

it's basically like having a near full-time job, but one in which you're treated like an ignorant shit drug user.

at least that was my brief experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Conservatism on the rampage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is no free lunch ..... Florida will pay ....
Their prestige and image as a tourist friendly state will suffer due to greater numbers of poor on the streets .... More theft, more robbery, more crime ...

There is no free ride ....

People have had it so good for so long, they have forgotten what 'bad' is ..... Wont stop them from rediscovering it ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. When's the last time you visited this state?
We've been paying dearly for at least three years already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC