Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ronald Reagan said that?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 11:44 PM
Original message
Ronald Reagan said that?
Ronald Reagan: “The profits of corporations have doubled, while workers wages have only increased by one quarter. In other words, profits have gone up four times as much as wages. And the small increase the workers did receive was more than eaten up by rising prices which have also bored into their savings. For example, here’s an Associated Press dispatch I read the other day about Smith L. Carpenter, a carpenter in Union Springs New York. Seems that Mister Carpenter retired some years ago thinking he had enough money saved so that he could live out his last years without having to worry. But he didn’t figure on this Republican inflation which ate up all his savings. And so he’s gone back to work. The reason this is news; is Mister Carpenter is ninety-one years old. Now take as a contrast the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey which reported a net profit of two hundred and ten million dollars, after taxes, for the first half of 1948. An increase of 70% in one year.”

link:
http://newstalgia.crooksandliars.com/gordonskene/newstalgia-reference-room-ronald-reaga
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reagan was a liberal at one time,
But then he saw the profit in going to the dark side and sold out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I knew that.
Edited on Wed Feb-09-11 11:51 PM by rpannier
He said he voted for Roosevelt 3 times -- not sure why he didn't vote 4 maybe he wasn't eligible in 32.
John Wayne was also a liberal until after the War.

I find it stunning that after beating a right wing dictatorship that these people went from the left to the right

I posted it more for people to use against their conservative friends

edited: Because 'a lso' is not a word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I don't find it stunning at all,
There were plenty of people who would have loved to turn this country into a RW dictatorship, both before and after the war. Henry Ford, Allan Dulles, Charles Lindbergh, Father Coughlin, on and on. But the post war revelations of the Holocaust kind of put a nix on supporting such ideologies, at least publicly. So those people instead put the cloak of respectful, if conservative, politics over the whole thing. They worked in the back channels, doing back room deals, pumping up the Cold War and such. It was a multi-generational project, but we're seeing the fruits of their work now, and bitter fruit it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGB67deux Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. As in....
Edited on Thu Feb-10-11 02:51 AM by MGB67deux
The United Fruit Company. They called the shots (no pun) in Central America with the help of the Dulles brothers, Allan and John Foster (CIA and Secretary of State).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGB67deux Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. A LSO
Edited on Thu Feb-10-11 02:43 AM by MGB67deux
.... actually makes sense. A landing signal officer. He would be the one with the paddles at the stern.

As for St. Ronnie. I guess everyone has a price.

At this point in time, and I never thought I would say this, I would enjoy having that notorious Lefty; Dwight David Eisenhower, as my president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep
His ambition led him into selling out to the big moneyed interests in order to have a chance at becoming President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Damned RINO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. It sounds exactly like what a Certain democrat would say in the primary.
And they called em Reagan Democrats for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Very interesting.
Thanks for sharing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. And there's more:
The Republican promises sounded pretty good in 1946, but what has happened since then, since the 80th Congress took over? Prices have climbed to the highest level in history, although the death of the OPA was supposed to bring prices down through "the natural process of free competition". Labor has been handcuffed with the vicious Taft-Hartley law. Social Security benefits have been snatched away from almost a million workers by the Gearhart bill. Fair employment practices, which had worked so well during war time, have been abandoned. Veterans' pleas for low cost homes have been ignored, and many people are still living in made-over chicken coops and garages.

Tax-reduction bills have been passed to benefit the higher-income brackets alone. The average worker saved only $1.73 a week. In the false name of economy, millions of children have been deprived of milk once provided through the federal school lunch program. This was the payoff of the Republicans' promises. And this is why we must have new faces in the Congress of the United States: Democratic faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC