NEW YORK TIMES CONFIRMS: OBAMA PROPOSES CUTTING LIHEAP BY 50% Updated at 5:30 AM
Edited on Thu Feb-10-11 04:01 AM by Divernan
Oh, that pesky New York Times - quoting Obama's administration officials again!
THIS CUT IS WHAT OBAMA WANTS!
THIS IS WHAT HE AND HIS ADMINISTRATION ARE PROPOSING!
Who dares deny this now? Now the apologists will doubtless switch their argument to defending the proposed cut.
What will their next polemic be? Let me guess. "Well, they were all going to die sometime, and freezing overnight is better than prolonged cancer." Or, "Hey, this is a two-fer. Save money on LIHEAP and clear the roles of the most impoverished and fragile on Medicaid." Just a bunch of heartless Malthusians excited about reducing the surplus population!
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/10/us/politics/10congres... "But Republicans have succeeded in shifting the focus to budget cutting so sufficiently that the White House will propose an array of cuts in the budget for next year that Mr. Obama sends to Capitol Hill on Monday.
Administration officials confirmed on Wednesday that the budget would propose to cut in half, to nearly $2.6 billion in fiscal year 2012, a federal program that subsidizes energy costs for low-income households.
The big reduction for the popular Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program immediately drew protests from lawmakers and antipoverty groups, as have several other cuts the administration has previewed for community service and environmental programs."