Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The next time a winger whines about increasing taxes on the wealthy.......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 11:20 AM
Original message
The next time a winger whines about increasing taxes on the wealthy.......
MarketWatch, via Yahoo!:




A $5,000 or $6,000 deduction for IRA contributions, a $4,000 deduction for college tuition and fees, a $1,000 child tax credit — these are hefty tax breaks for which a taxpayer may understandably yearn. But they’re small beans when compared with the tens of thousands of dollars in savings some reap through deductions and credits.

How about taking a $50,000 deduction for state and local taxes paid, a $37,000 deduction for medical expenses, a $28,000 deduction for mortgage interest, or a $21,000 deduction for charitable contributions?

Those are the average amounts claimed for each of those deductions in 2008 by taxpayers with adjusted gross income higher than $250,000, the group with the highest average claim for each of those deductions that year, said Mark Luscombe, principal tax analyst with CCH Inc., a Riverwoods, Ill.-based tax publisher and unit of Wolters Kluwer. (The average dollar amounts are rounded, and count only those taxpayers who claimed that particular deduction.)

....(snip)....

“For one reason or another these very, very wealthy people have set up their financial situation in such a way that they avoid U.S. federal income taxes entirely.” ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://custom.yahoo.com/taxes/article-111999-01e557a6-efff-4d4c-a8d1-f14bcd802b7b-tax-deductions-with-some-of-the-biggest-payouts



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. These exemptions should be phased out.
Edited on Wed Feb-16-11 11:23 AM by dkf
Isn't this what the AMT was supposed to address? Maybe we need to make that work properly instead of simply alleviating it's effects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Get rid of all decutions, and AMT and go back to a simple tax system. See my post below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Since S&l taxes are added back when calculating AMT
This article is misleading.

The purposes of most features of the tax law are to try to take into account legitimate expenses that reduce the amount people have available for fed tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Which is why I believe we should eliminate ALL deductions.
Edited on Wed Feb-16-11 11:42 AM by Statistical
I know it sound radical but something like

Income from all sources.
$0 to $40K in income - 0% rate
$40K - $80K - 10% rate
$80K - $250K - 18% rate
$250K - $1 mil - 25% rate
$1 mil - $5 mil - 35% rate
>$5 mil - 42% rate

Obviously the exact rates would need some analysis by CBO to match current revenue requirements but the above illustrates the concept.

Your taxes could be done on a postcard. People with less than $40K in wages wouldn't even have federal income taxes witheld from paychecks. Witholding would begin at >$40K in income.

You can raise the marginal rates to 91% but the deductions, credits, and exemptions allow people to minimize the taxes paid. What sense does it make to raise taxes and then increase deductions so the EFFECTIVE tax rate remains the same (or even falls).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Makes more sense than what we have today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC