Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone know what WI public employees pay for benefits now, and what it will go up to?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 01:26 PM
Original message
Does anyone know what WI public employees pay for benefits now, and what it will go up to?
Edited on Fri Feb-18-11 01:30 PM by newtothegame
I work for a non-profit cancer center in the rural Midwest, so our state's #'s might be comparable to Wisconsin's. Though my workplace is community-based, we're not considered public employees so these #'s are for a private employee.

I think my benefits are pretty good, but I'm fairly new to the workforce and don't have a lot of other jobs to compare it to. Our high deductible health plans ($2500) for singles have a premium around $40 a month. Our low deductible plans ($1500) have premiums probably around $60 or $70, I'm not sure. These #'s are for singles, not families. So for me, I have $18 taken out of every paycheck and I have to meet a deductible of $2500 for the year before I get benefits. I do pay lower prices just for having insurance though as the care locations have negotiated rates with my insurance company.

I have no pension, but do have a 401k that is matched by my employer up to 3% of my biweekly paycheck I just started contributing 3% this year to get the match. I have total control of the amount I contribute and what I invest into (stocks foreign/domestic, bonds, cash, etc.).

What are the premiums, deductibles, and retirement for Wisconsin public employees; anybody know?

ed for sp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just think of it as an 8% pay cut.
It really doesn't have to get more complicated than that. I don't really care whether you give me a 401(k) where you pay 5% and I pay 5%... or you just pay me 5% more and I pay the entire 10%. Ignoring tax implications, it's really the same thing. If your company pays 100% of your health insurance premiums, you can bet that your salary is lower than it would otherwise be... by about that same amount.

Roughly 15% of your gross salary goes to FICA. Does it really matter than half is paid by your employer directly and half is paid out of your salary? I assure you that your employer knows how much the TOTAL cost of employing you is... and that's the figure they care about (as should you).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. please look at total package
I am just on my way out the door for my fourth day at the capitol in Madison, so I'm in a hurry.

I'm not a member of any of the unions (self-employed), so I don't know the specifics of the benefits. But what is relevant is that through collective bargaining, the union workers have given up a lot in wages in order to have the good benefits. Now Walker is stripping the right to collective bargaining, and trying to make the Union workers pay twice as much for the benefits, while freezing pay.

What is important, if one is to compare, is the total compensation package.

And what is MOST IMPORTANT is that he is stripping away collective bargaining. He is a bully.

SOLIDARITY :patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Would also be interesting to learn what State Legislators and the Governor pay as well
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well they're in the same bin, public employees right?
Edited on Fri Feb-18-11 01:52 PM by newtothegame
Wouldn't this affect the governor himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. ABC's Good Morning America had some average figures
and said for the average state employee, Walker's plan would cost them $3300 a year. That is almost $300 a month. Most middle class families I know would really feel the pain of an extra $300 a month for benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. True. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. when it comes to pain though - which is worse
for 100,000 employees to lose $3300 per year (which will save them $495 in federal taxes alone) or for 4,000 employees to lose their jobs? Both of those cuts would presumably cost the same.

My other questions would be. How much revenue can be raised with a 1% surcharge on incomes above $100,000 and/or a .2% addition to the sales tax?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Walker has already gotten several of his tax cuts passed and he apparently plans more.
I don't think this is as much about balancing the budget as it is about busting the unions. That is why he is trying to take away most of their collective bargaining rights.

Check out this post detailing Walker's tax cuts,some already a done deal, some in the works.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=447965&mesg_id=447965
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. as I understand it, they pay nothing for retirement and pay 5% of health care costs
And the proposal is to raise that from 5% to 12%.

But I do not know if the 5% figure is for singles, couples or families.

Because where I work in Kansas, for a city. There are two choices for health care, besides the choice of nothing.

There's 80/60 for $618.97 for singles, $1146.28 for couples or $1274.4 for families (amazing how multiple children can be covered for just $128 a month)

Then there's 90/70 for 650.49, 1166.28, or 1293.44

For 80/60 a full time employee pays $0, 286.57 pr $318.61 or 0%, 25% or 25% (but if you look at it another way, people with families get paid $336.86 per month more than single people for doing the same job for the same employer.)

For 90/70 a full time employee pays $31.52, 306.57 or 337.61 - or 4.8%, 26.3% or 26.1%

So I don't really understand the whole 5%/12% breakdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here's my breakdown..
Edited on Fri Feb-18-11 02:16 PM by Viking12
It varies a little across agencies. I am an at will, non-union state employee.

Health care premium: currently $89/month; will go to $204/month
Retirement currently 1% or $35/month; will go to $198/month
Total proposed increase= $278/month less take home, $3336/year

These new contributions will be on top of the 3% ($102/month) cut from furloughs that have been in place since 2009.

After this bill passes, I will take home $380month/$4560year less than I did 2 years ago. My kids are already eligible for free lunches at school.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. How does public employee retirement work?
Edited on Fri Feb-18-11 02:50 PM by newtothegame
For me, I put up to 3% in my 401k, my employer matches, and then grows (presumably) over the years. With no growth, at retirement I'll have exactly what I put in + exactly what my employer put in. If the market completely tanks, I could lose all.

Since you're saying that retirement is a set amount amount that is required to go up, I'm assuming the WI public employee retirement program is not optional? I don't know much about the difference between 401k's and pensions.

Why don't companies offer pensions anymore?

And what happens if you leave a job with a pension? If I leave my job right now, my 401k can rollover into another 401k or into an IRA, albeit with a little paperwork on my part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Rather than explain, I'll link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thank you! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC