Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(WI) "Bill could wreck mass transit; millions in federal aid at stake":

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 06:35 AM
Original message
(WI) "Bill could wreck mass transit; millions in federal aid at stake":
http://lacrossetribune.com/news/article_c18d2c58-3f0b-11e0-b031-001cc4c03286.html

Public transit could come to a halt in La Crosse if the deadlocked Legislature passes Gov. Scott Walker’s budget repair bill as written.

Federal funding accounts for about 35 percent of the Metropolitan Transit Utility’s operating budget, and that $1.9 million in aid requires a collective bargaining agreement with employees.

Walker’s proposal, which prohibits collective bargaining for most state and local government workers, could jeopardize that funding, according to analysis by the state’s Legislative Fiscal Bureau.

“You take that kind of hit … and what do you have left?” said Keith Carlson, La Crosse’s transit manager. “That’s just on the operating side.”


For those states that had previously been blue or even purple: this is what happens when you give Republicans unfettered control of a state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. They privatized transportation in the 1980s here in Jamaica
and by the 90s, the new government was forced to nationalize it. Public transportation actually makes life easy for business. No private entity wants to run outside of peak times and during peak times it's 'devil take the hind most' as they race against each other for passengers. Say goodbye to lower fares for children, the elderly or the impaired. I don't remember a time when more school children were killed by buses as the greedy fuckers would move off while children were handing on trying to enter.

This neo-liberal bullshit is absolute madness - it does not work. Within a year the said pro-privatization businessmen will be begging the state to nationalize because all the late shifts suffered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Feds require collective bargaining for federal funds?
Is that how all these funds work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here is more about it from the Huffington Post:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/22/walker-unions-wisconsin-protests_n_826908.html

WASHINGTON -- Budget referees and transportation officials in Wisconsin have informed Gov. Scott Walker (R) that if he were to pass his controversial anti-union legislation into law, he could be forfeiting tens of millions of dollars in federal funds for transportation.

Under an obscure provision of federal labor law, states risk losing federal funds should they eliminate "collective bargaining rights" that existed at the time when federal assistance was first granted. The provision, known as "protective arrangements" or "Section 13C arrangements," is meant as a means of cushioning union (and even some non-union) members who, while working on local projects, are affected by federal grants.

It also could potentially hamstring governors like Walker who want dramatic changes to labor laws in their states. Wisconsin received $74 million in federal transit funds this fiscal year. Of that, $46.6 million would be put at risk should the collective-bargaining bill come to pass -- in the process creating an even more difficult fiscal situation than the one that, ostensibly, compelled Walker to push the legislation in the first place.

The governor is certainly aware of this. While the potential loss of funds may have escaped the attention of many observers, sources familiar with the state's transportation policy tell The Huffington Post that Walker's office has been informed of the relevant legal language. Moreover, in an a nearly unnoticed report filed by the state's Legislative Fiscal Bureau, the non-partisan budget scorekeeper, the stakes are laid fairly bare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. There is a concerted effort to keep us all slaves to the automobile
Consuming gasoline until it is all gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC