Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court bars streaming of TV programming online

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Seedersandleechers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 10:33 AM
Original message
Court bars streaming of TV programming online
In a key victory for television broadcasters, a federal court has ordered a Seattle start-up called ivi Inc. to stop distributing broadcast signals over the Internet without their consent.

The U.S. District Court in New York issued a preliminary injunction against ivi on Tuesday barring the company from streaming copyright-protected broadcast programming online.

Ivi captures over-the-air broadcast signals from stations in Seattle, New York, Chicago and Los Angeles and delivers them to subscribers who have downloaded its ivi TV player, which costs $4.99 a month.

The company is being sued for copyright infringement by the big broadcast networks, local stations in New York and Seattle, public broadcasters, several large movie studios and Major League Baseball.

http://www.kansascity.com/2011/02/22/2674103/court-bars-streaming-of-tv-programming.html



That really sucks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. This was a proper decision. ivi was profiting from another's work without permission or
proper compensation to the copyright holder.
Moral, get permission first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think this is a fair ruling...
Ivi is capturing (free) over-the-air broadcasts, and re-selling them, I assume, at a profit.
It's pretty clear-cut copyright infringement, in my opinion.

People who do pay for cable/satellite television pay a monthly subscription fee as well, but those cable/satellite companies in turn pay licensing fees to the networks for the rights to distribute those broadcasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. They profitted
If it would have been for free, that would be a different story. Good ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. What sucks about it? Hulu is out there and other similar programs
There are plenty of ways to get contant justifiably and often free online.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC