Obama Orders Justice Department to Stop Defending Defense of Marriage Act

Marc Ambinder
http://www.nationaljournal.com/obama-orders-justice-department-to-stop-defending-defense-of-marriage-act-20110223

President Obama has decided that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional and has asked his Justice Department to stop defending it in court, the administration announced today.

"The President believes that DOMA is unconstitutional. They are no longer going to be defending the cases in the 1st and 2nd circuits," a person briefed on the decision said.

The administration will formally notify Congress later today. The act sought to restrict single-sex unions.


Statement of the Attorney General on Litigation Involving the Defense of Marriage Act
more at link
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/February/11-ag-222.html

The Attorney General made the following statement today about the Department’s course of action in two lawsuits, Pedersen v. OPM and Windsor v. United States, challenging Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines marriage for federal purposes as only between a man and a woman:

In the two years since this Administration took office, the Department of Justice has defended Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act on several occasions in federal court. Each of those cases evaluating Section 3 was considered in jurisdictions in which binding circuit court precedents hold that laws singling out people based on sexual orientation, as DOMA does, are constitutional if there is a rational basis for their enactment. While the President opposes DOMA and believes it should be repealed, the Department has defended it in court because we were able to advance reasonable arguments under that rational basis standard.

Section 3 of DOMA has now been challenged in the Second Circuit, however, which has no established or binding standard for how laws concerning sexual orientation should be treated. In these cases, the Administration faces for the first time the question of whether laws regarding sexual orientation are subject to the more permissive standard of review or whether a more rigorous standard, under which laws targeting minority groups with a history of discrimination are viewed with suspicion by the courts, should apply.

After careful consideration, including a review of my recommendation, the President has concluded that given a number of factors, including a documented history of discrimination, classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to a more heightened standard of scrutiny. The President has also concluded that Section 3 of DOMA, as applied to legally married same-sex couples, fails to meet that standard and is therefore unconstitutional. Given that conclusion, the President has instructed the Department not to defend the statute in such cases. I fully concur with the President’s determination.

Letter from the Attorney General to Congress on Litigation Involving the Defense of Marriage Act
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/February/11-ag-223.html

it's "HUGH" :hi:

:toast: :hi:

Sid

I am glad for this.

Very good.

I could have sworn, when Obama took a less popular position, that he had no choice in the matter.

That said, K & R:thumbsup:

K and R

http://www.nationaljournal.com/n2kvideos
press conference

From ThinkProgress
http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/23/doj-doma-defend/

Press Secretary Jay Carney stressed that the two lawsuits filed in November of 2010 pushed the administration to reach its decision. Here is why:

Unlike previous challenges, the new lawsuits were filed in districts covered by the appeals court in New York — one of the only circuits with no modern precedent saying how to evaluate claims that a law discriminates against gay people. That means that the administration, for the first time, may be required to take a clear stand on politically explosive questions like whether gay men and lesbians have been unfairly stigmatized, are politically powerful, and can choose to change their sexual orientation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/29/us/politics/29marriage.html