Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joan Walsh, Salon: Scott Walker punks workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 05:58 PM
Original message
Joan Walsh, Salon: Scott Walker punks workers
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/02/23/scott_walker_punks_workers

I rarely disagree with the Washington Post's top wonk Ezra Klein, but I do today. Klein is right that the most politically "lethal" thing about Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's 20-minute conversation with a prankster posing as right-wing moneybags David Koch is that it happened at all. But he's wrong when he says "the transcript of the conversation is unexceptional" and that "to Walker's credit, he doesn't say anything incriminating."

I think Walker's comments are hugely incriminating, maybe not legally, although the governor does seem to say yes ("That would be outstanding!") to a Koch-funded trip to California to reward his work supporting the super-rich, which could be construed as the promise of an illegal gift. But listening to Walker lay out his plans to trick Democrats into returning to Wisconsin, brag about his national popularity, compare himself to Ronald Reagan and joke about the "stereotypical blue-collar worker types" who support his union busting, I thought the conversation incriminated Walker as an enormous hypocrite: someone who pretends he's protecting state taxpayers and beleaguered private-sector employees, but is really part of a cynical fat-cat movement to pit workers against one another while insisting "it's all about gettin' our freedom back!" You really have to hear it (audio here) or read it all (transcript below) to believe it.

My favorite part is when "Koch" suggests that if Walker meets with Democrats he should "bring a baseball bat, that's what I'd do," and the governor chirps: "I have one in my office; you’d be happy with that. I have a slugger with my name on it," like he's talking to his daddy. Which makes sense, since Koch is at least Walker's political sugar daddy.

But the saddest part is when Walker brags that the supposedly liberal New York Times "has a great story," in which the writer interviews "every stereotypical blue-collar worker type" and finds that, just like a guy repeatedly laid off by General Motors, they all support his taking on the public workers' unions -- unless, of course, they're a public worker or married to one. Oops. The Times story in question is tragic, as victims of the economy blame their troubles not on employers, but on public workers' unions. "There are a lot of people out of work right now that would take a job without a union," a bar owner in Whitewater told the Times. A woman who works at a billboard advertising company opined: "I know there was a point for unions back in the day because people were being abused. But now there’s workers' rights; there's laws that protect us." Laws that unions fought for, of course.

-snip-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. She hits the nail on the head in a beautifully written piece that exposes Walker for
who he is and the Republican agenda for what it is. So sad that so many blue collar workers have not idea of the role that unions played in the gains of all blue collar workers. They might be surprised how quickly those "laws protecting them" would disappear with an overwhelming Republican majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Walsh is right. The conversation was
Edited on Wed Feb-23-11 06:08 PM by ProSense
loaded with incriminating comments.

Transcript:

<...>

Walker: …I’ve got layoff notices ready…

Koch: Beautiful; beautiful. Gotta crush that union.

Walker: …I would be willing to sit down and talk to him, the assembly Democrat leader, plus the other two Republican leaders—talk, not negotiate and listen to what they have to say if they will in turn—but I’ll only do it if all 14 of them will come back and sit down in the state assembly…legally, we believe, once they’ve gone into session, they don’t physically have to be there. If they’re actually in session for that day, and they take a recess, the 19 Senate Republicans could then go into action and they’d have quorum…so we’re double checking that. If you heard I was going to talk to them that’s the only reason why. We’d only do it if they came back to the capital with all 14 of them…

Koch: Bring a baseball bat. That’s what I’d do.

Walker: I have one in my office; you’d be happy with that. I have a slugger with my name on it.

Koch: Beautiful.

<...>



NYT editorial:


<...>

In Wisconsin, union leaders agreed to concessions requested by Mr. Walker: to pay nearly 6 percent of their wages for pension costs, up from nearly zero, and double payments for health insurance. At that point, most governors would declare victory and move on. Instead, Mr. Walker has rejected union concessions and won’t even negotiate. His true priority is stripping workers of collective-bargaining rights and reducing their unions to a shell. The unions would no longer be able to raise money to oppose him, as they did in last year’s election, easing the way for future Republicans as well.

<...>


From letter (PDF) sent to Walker by Wisconsin State Senator Tim Carpenter (h/t)

<...>

At a historic moment in our State’s history, brought on by your refusal to compromise
with elected officials regarding the elimination of worker’s rights, you still refuse to talk
with Democratic legislators. However, you apparently have no problem taking a phone
call from “Mr. Koch” and to:

  • Discuss your strategy to lay off public workers to seek partisan advantage to pass
    your agenda;
  • Discuss your plan to lure Democratic legislators to the Capitol on the pretext of
    negotiation, but then state that you would never actually negotiate;
  • Discuss your plan to use the pretext of negotiation to get a quorum for legislative
    fiscal action that Republicans so far have not been able to do;
  • Discuss that you considered the “planting” of paid troublemakers into the
    peaceful protests at our Capitol; and to
  • Give your enthusiastic acceptance to an offer from “Koch” to fly you out on a
    vacation to show you a “good time” once you “crush these bastards.” Your
    response was “That would be outstanding…” Given that Koch’s businesses could
    reap vast rewards with the ‘no bid’ sale of the Wisconsin’s power plants that you
    propose in your budget repair bill, this response is severely troubling.
<...>




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. All those laws protecting workers just got there by themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rarely do I disagree with Joan Walsh
This is no exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Joan Walsh
is in league with Molly Ivins - brilliant journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Of course the story isn't "tragic" from Walker's point of view
The thing is, there's nothing in Walker's comments that sounds like he's saying "ha ha, we duped those rubes all right". It's like even though he is on the phone talking to (he thinks) his corporate sugar daddy, part of him still believes the narrative pushed by all the corporate media, though initially perfected by Rupert Murdoch, that he is somehow on the side of the little guy, pushing back against those liberal elitists with their fancy book-learning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC