Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TSA Yanks Pricey Security Puffers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 10:26 AM
Original message
TSA Yanks Pricey Security Puffers
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41770798

More than 200 machines once touted as a high-tech response to keep the skies safe have been removed from service.

The 207 Explosive Trace Detection portals purchased by the Transportation Security Administration are now sitting in a government warehouse.

The $150,000 machines were designed to blast passengers with a puff of air and then analyze the particles it shook loose searching for any sign of explosive materials. "When they worked well, they were outstanding," said Larry Wansley, the former head of security for American Airlines. But the units rarely worked.

"With the testing that was done in the labs, they really couldn't simulate an airport environment, and that was the joker in the deck," Wansley said. The TSA would not agree to an interview, but a spokesperson confirmed that dirt, debris and humidity commonly found in most airports rendered the units useless. The agency acknowledges that it spent nearly $30 million to purchase and maintain the so-called "puffer machines." But less then half of the units were ever deployed.

In 2008, the TSA started to quietly remove the 94 units that were deployed across the country. The last remaining machines were removed from service last year. Critics say the TSA wasted $30 million in a rush to put untested technology into service instead of doing the necessary research.



$30 million wasted here, $30 million wasted there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. What is depressing is that a lot of effort went into this failed piece of equipment.
I wonder how many people thought they had a good job making this stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC