Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Cillizza Thinks Pissing Off Liberals With Tax Cut Deal Made Obama 'Look Big'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 02:38 AM
Original message
Chris Cillizza Thinks Pissing Off Liberals With Tax Cut Deal Made Obama 'Look Big'
December 21, 2010 04:00 AM
Chris Cillizza Thinks Pissing Off Liberals With Tax Cut Deal Made Obama 'Look Big'

By Heather

http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/chris-cillizza-thinks-pissing-liberals-tax



As Digby noted, apparently the hippie punching by Obama has the Villagers terribly excited... and losing 8% of liberals while gaining 5% of moderates adds up to a big "win" in the eyes of Chris Matthews and Chris Cillizza.

The New Compromise:

Whether or not it made Obama look "bigger" to the country is unknown. But hitting the left where it hurts certainly made him look like a big, big hero to the Villagers. And I feel quite confident that the White House knew that would happen. After all, it's not like it's an original tactic.


And as she also noted in that same post, the "gasbags" over at CNN were talking about Obama alienating his base as well and basically saying it didn't matter since they had no where else to go and I agree with her on this point.

I'd say he'd better worry just a teensy bit about liberals in the congress even if he agrees that liberals in the country can be taken for granted since "everyone" knows they have no choice but to vote for him anyway. Congresspeople have to be responsive to their constituents. And many of them represent that same liberal base. They might want very much to support the presidents long march to the right so that he can get all those moderates out there who allegedly want tax cuts for millionaires, but they may just start feeling the same kind of pressure from their liberal constituents that the conservatives face from the their Tea partiers (who for some reason, these gasbags never seem to think can be safely ignored.)

The Tea Party has shown that successful primaries against stalwart conservatives gives them power. Do the Villagers think the left didn't notice that? Do they think that the liberals in congress didn't notice it either?


She's right and even if the Obama administration thinks they can still win elections while ignoring their base, you can't say the same thing about the Congress. I hope to hell that no one who is as disgusted as I am about what's going on right now decides to sit it out during primary races. House races are the one place we have to push back that don't cost a fortune most of the time, although the Supreme Court just made that battle harder as well in some cases.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. it's sad
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 02:40 AM by Skittles
but look how many so-called "progressives" on DU are pleased as punch with what is happening - their heads are completely in the sand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. DUers with their heads in the sand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. So, Skittles, you're suggesting that "so-called progressives" on DU have their heads completely
in the sand. Hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. um
look how many so-called "progressives" = not all, but certainly enough to be VERY DISTURBING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Amurcans love it when the powerful piss on the weak. Limbaugh, et. al., has made millions off of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. The base may have "nowhere else to go"
as far as voting is concerned but the vote may not be enough. Since so many of the base are the ones that do the grunt work and give the money I guess time will tell how much they are needed come election time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. any money not coming from the base will be more than made up for by
corporations and the wealthy.

After all, they are the big benefactors of much of the legislation during the past few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It is time to let the Corporations foot the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PADemD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Corporations don't do phone banking or parade walking or door-to door
canvassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. they sure buy a lot of television time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PADemD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Have you ever volunteered for a campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. yes I have - what is your point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PADemD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Then you realize that people and money are needed to run a campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. show me where I said differently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hope this gamble pays off for him.
As far as politics go, maybe it will. As far as principles go, it was a weasel thing to do.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well, either we got tossed a couple bones
or he's paying attention, it's hard to say. We lost on the tax bill and won DADT, Start, and got half of what we needed for 9/11 responders. Now there are rumblings on DOMA. I hope this is a trend and not a few bones setting us up for something bigger. Like SS privatization.

I hate to be this cynical but what do you expect. After 2 years they finally start appeasing the base on the way out the door?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Look at what "we" got, after the big tax sell-out.
DADT is a social issue that the wealthy don't give a shit about. The START Treaty is common sense national defense, and one of those rare examples of something that ought be wholly bipartisan. Aid for 9/11 responders costs next to nothing and isn't a Democratic issue at all-- it's simply civic duty and the sort of thing that any country would be obligated to do for people like that.

We got a handful of magic beans and the wealthy/Wall Street took the cow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC