Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it worth it to argue down right wing myths?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:27 AM
Original message
Is it worth it to argue down right wing myths?
It’s true. There’s piles of research that show that people don’t change their minds just because they lose arguments or are presented with overwhelming evidence. So, is there value in arguing with conservatives? I say yes, depending of course on the situation. Here are some examples of how you can get value out of arguing with conservatives:

1) Doing so for an audience of undecided people. As I noted in the comments, this can take many forms, and how you win the argument should depend on the form. For instance, if you’re forwarded an urban myth, it’s probably unwise to get into a values argument that involves hitting “Reply All”, because then people will just think you’re an asshole. However, you can hit “Reply All” and put in a link that explains the facts. If someone on the list isn’t really a fan or doesn’t know what to think of these forwards, this might actually push them into your camp. Other places were arguments for undecideds happen: Group situations, Twitter, Facebook, comment threads at blogs, etc. You don’t often know who’s listening. I’ve seen many people who were in a questioning mode learn from this.

2) Planting a seed. You may not change a mind right away by winning an argument, but if you can introduce enough cognitive dissonance, you can often get them to think a little more in the future. I’ve definitely seen complete about-faces on an issue months after someone lost the argument, and had to really think about it. I’ve also seen people moderate their views after losing an argument. Both are valuable. Cognitive dissonance is painful, but it fades over time, and in that time, coming around can and often does happen. Why do you think the polling has changed so much over the years on gay rights? Because people who were homophobic came around, bit by bit, a little at a time.

3) Getting someone off your back. This is not nothing. I know a lot of really incorrigible right wingers, and they get pleasure out of pushing the buttons of liberals. And they exploit the fact that liberals don’t want to argue with them, because liberals fall into this trap of thinking that it’s not worth it if you don’t get to a mind-changing event. But I have managed to get plenty of conservatives to back the fuck off me because I figured out that as much as I don’t like having my buttons pushed with bigoted or ignorant comments, they like even less being shown up in an argument. Reducing someone to sputtering is not fun for them, and will dramatically reduce the chances they’ll provoke you again.

A word of warning about this one: You have to be willing to see it to the bitter end. You can’t back out halfway, because they take that as a “win” and will come back for more. Either you go scorched earth and leave them with no arguments, or you don’t play. Upsetting liberals is something conservatives think is fun, and so unless they’re the one who is upset at the end of it, you will have lost even if your arguments were better. But if you really want someone off your back, this can be extremely effective.

4) Minimizing their influence on others. You may not have undecided people listening now, but there are potential undecideds in the future that your wingnut could influence with misinformation. And while you may not be able to change someone’s mind about underlying values, you can often be very effective in scaring them away from saying things that you demonstrated were not true. People repeat urban legends because it feels good to do so. If a particular urban legend, however, mostly reminds them of the time you made them look foolish, they’ll probably not repeat it. This reduces the chances they can, for lack of a better word, recruit with that particular story. You’re taking tools out of the toolbox.

You saw this happen with Mike Huckabee, a glib liar who is nonetheless interested in preserving his reputation that he enjoys as the Not So Bad Wingnut. Huckabee went into a conservative space, and let his hair down and indulged in a little birtherism, claiming that Obama was raised in Kenya. This got called out, and now he’s scrambling. Yes, he’s lying as he scrambles, but here’s what’s important: He is very unlikely to go there again. He got really burned on this one. You can replicate this effect on all sorts of wingnuts.

http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/is_it_worth_it_to_argue_down_right_wing_myths/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nope.. You'll have as much luck convincing someone to change religions
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 10:31 AM by SoCalDem
Ideology & love-of-myths is not something people can be talked out of.

These are not rational people. They know what they know, and that's all they want to know...even if it's not fact-based.

Until a situation enters their household, and they see the light for themselves, they will never change.. you are wasting your time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think the gist of the essay is, there are other reasons to bother doing it.
And, of course, mileage may vary. I suspect there is also some kind of personality requirement. None of this works very well unless you enjoy the process of heated argument.

Essentially, the right wing has made 40 years of progress in this way -- arguing things that were supposedly beyond argument. I don't think it's a coincidence that they are also the Party Of Assholes. Assholes play the argumentation game very well, because they like it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Whoa! If you're going to argue with wingnuts, keep it short - like 3 words of 5 or fewer letters.
Big words and a lot of words just confuse them and they go into robotic FOX Noise parrot mode.

You have to consider the limited cognitive abilities of wingnuts. You probably have green shit growing on something in the back of your refrigerator that's smarter than they are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just laugh at their "opinions." Mock them and ask if they really believe that. Laugh some more.
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 10:53 AM by FSogol
That how we keep the mouths shut on the freepers in the office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. #1 and #4 are related, but BOTH are the main..........
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 11:51 AM by socialist_n_TN
reasons I'll argue. The undecided deserve to hear and alternate viewpoint. The lack of a clearly stated alternate view is what allowed the RW to gain so much influence during the 80s and we're paying for it today.

So argue to show people that there's another way rather than being a RW thug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. right. If nobody argues with them, others will think they are correct with their lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. BINGO! WE are the alternative........
It's no accident that we started gaining influence right after Bush's 2nd term. We started getting loud and proud and won the House in '06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes it is, because if you don't you've committed a greater transgression.
You've not only let the poor bastards wallow in their ignorance when you know better but given them plenty of room to spread their ignorant poison.

Your knowledge, awareness, education, experience, enlightened point of view, compels you to share your bounty, either to lift up the ignorant or protect them from themselves and/or others like them.

Thanks for the thread, phantom power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. There are examples of right wing nuts seeing the light and changing their minds
David Brock for instance or Arriana Huffington.. It can happen and our very best weapon to try and make it happen is Rachel Maddow. She always shows respect and provides multiple examples to bolster her case..We all should learn from her how to present our case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes. But only to discredit the stupid people promulgating the myths.
If they had the wits to understand the facts they wouldn't be repeating the myths.

The real audience is the onlookers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. arguing is a waste of time, they're trained to dismiss liberal talk. LAUGHING is far more effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Give them easily verifiable facts that explode their myths.
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 12:12 PM by reformist2
Here's one: That during the height of the great "American Decade" of the 1950s, the top income-tax bracket was 91%. And this with a Republican president, and a Republican congress!

Most people will dismiss a different political opinion, but most won't dismiss a fact, especially if they look it up for themselves. Facts are stubborn things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Right-wingers have more in common with left-wingers than we realize
Both groups realize that something is terribly wrong. Unfortunately, most of the right-wing explanations of the causes are selfish, hateful, or just bat-shit crazy.

I've got a right-wing acquaintance who fits the previous description of wanting to push my buttons.

Here are a couple of things I do in an attempt to make inroads.

1. Let him know I still care about him as a person. Our side is the side of compassion. I try not to undermine that by simply becoming a walking rebuttal robot to his wacky views. I talk to him about his family and his job and try to listen to his triumphs and travails with a sensitive ear. At the very least, it's the human thing to do. At best, I hope any affection or respect he feels for me in this area will make him pay attention to my views a little more closely eventually.

2. Look for real-life examples and situations that help to make my point. One time he was complaining about how over-worked and under-appreciated he felt at his job and how his boss was forcing him to take on additional tasks that used to be the responsibility of another employee. I looked at him with concern and asked, "Have you talked to your union rep about this?" Needless to say, he has no union rep and he hates unions (just as Limbaugh and Beck have instructed) but for a brief moment I could almost audibly hear the gears grinding in his head as he realized it might be helpful to have someone on his side at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
15. K&R
I agree with her. You're not likely to win them over today, but eventually some of them will change their minds. Even if they don't, fuck 'em. You can still humiliate them in front of undecideds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmandaMae Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. depends on the person, I would say
I like to argue logically but some of them just shout over you and won't listen to a word you have to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC