Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you know the real impact of the House-passed budget cuts?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
natrlron Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 04:11 PM
Original message
Do you know the real impact of the House-passed budget cuts?
Edited on Sun Mar-06-11 04:15 PM by natrlron
Believe it or not, but the American people have not been told the impact of the proposed $61 billion budget cuts recently passed by the House of Representatives. Yes, they’ve been told that health, education, and safety will be impacted, and that some jobs will be lost, but they’ve been given very few specifics to react to.

So today I tried to find out what that impact would be. To my shock and dismay, I found that there was no … I repeat … no source that answered that question. No newspaper, no magazine, no government report, no Democratic Party position paper … nothing. I searched the Internet in vain. All I could find were the same vague statements being repeated over and over again.

And so I went digging for specifics. Here’s what I could find:

Veterans:
$75 million Would deprive 11,000 homeless veterans of vouchers for housing

Children:
In total, programs benefiting children are cut 21%
$330 million Health
$2.6 billion Education … for example, significant cuts are made in Head Start
and other early education efforts that would cause 368,000 children
to lose early education slots. These cuts will also cause many
Head Start programs to close and many teachers to lose their jobs.
$139 million Youth Training
$3.5 billion Housing subsidies
$30 million Safety
$782 million Nutrition, mostly from the successful WIC (Women with Infant
Children) program

Food and Health Safety:
$1.3 billion cuts from FDA, FSIS, and CDC budgets. These cuts will iimpact
everything from the number of federal meat inspectors ($53
million) to dollars spent to control the spread of HIV.

Border and Immigration
$600 million

The bill would also completely eliminate federal funding for a host of programs including Americorps, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (NPR and PBS), and Planned Parenthood.

The number of jobs .. both government (federal, state, and local) and private … that would be lost as a result of the $61 billion in budget cuts has been estimated as high as 700,000. Needless to say, any sizeable increase in unemployment will hurt the economy and hurt families.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg. WHY hasn’t the Democratic Party or any news organization put together this vital information, preferably in a comprehensible form, so that the people can see what is happening and voice their opposition … if indeed they are opposed … to their representatives in Congress?

Remember that 2-years extension of the Bush tax cuts for those earning more than $250,000 that the Republicans insisted on and the Democrats opposed. That tax cut added $100 billion to the deficit for just that 2-year period. But the Republicans won’t consider the impact of tax cuts on the deficit. This is a clear example how they give to the rich and take from the poor and workers. For them, there is no shared sacrifice.

If ever there is a need for effective communication, that time is now!

For more on this issue and others, see my blog, http://PreservingAmericanGreatness.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. "WHY hasn’t the Democratic Party put together this vital information?"
That really IS the question, isn't it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. A=B n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrlron Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It sure is!
And unfortunately, not just on this issue but on just about everything. As one of the other posts says today, the Dems have a terrible record of creating and controlling the message. The Republicans are always outsmarting them. I've been saying that for years in various different forums, but nothing every changes. But I don't understand. This is rocket science. How is it that people who rise to the top of the Dem power structure just don't understand how to communicate with the people in a way that they get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Better yet, why doesn't our FUCKING news media report this?
Rather than promoting Republicans 24/7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrlron Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Definitely
that would be even better. They have reported bits and pieces, but they haven't put it all together in one place. I'm really surprised that the NY Times hasn't done that because that's the kind of analysis that they often do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. For what it is worth, the cable media has trained viewers to be skeptical of anything a Democrat say
And then they train viewers to take anything a Republican says at face value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. BINGO!! Where is Thom Hartmann on this? Where is Rachel on this?
Ed Schultz is hopeless on poverty.. he only carea bout the middleclass, but the rest of them... what the hell??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Why didn't they pass the budget
last year when they had the prez, house and senate.

Then they wouldn't even be talking about it until next year's budget is brought up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. You forgot the sarcasm tag
no magazine or newspaper will print what Dems have to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrlron Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That may be, but
why don't they put together the info themselves? You'd think at least the NY Times or the Washington Post would put together a helpful graph/chart with this type of information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. So, then what is the excuse for the "progressive" media?
You know, the ones whho are totally focused on the middleclass, and forget poverty???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrlron Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. The failure of liberal journalism
is the reason. You don't see news commentators on the right holding back on these issues. They are out there arousing their viewers. But it's not just the media, what about the Party. It's in there on self-interest to communicate this info to the public; it's in Obama's interest to say it from his bully pulpit. But there is no coherent statement. It's maddening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. k..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. I am sure there are provisions in there to create jobs
the weeping boner said he would create jobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrlron Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. There are none
You can be sure that if there were any, the Republicans would have made hay with it. Really, they haven't said a word about creating jobs since the election. It's all been about cutting the budget and using that as a front to attack and get rid of all the things that have rankled them for years ... whether is public broadcasting or the EPA or unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC