Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why isn't Obama preventing our destruction?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:12 PM
Original message
Why isn't Obama preventing our destruction?
The United States will not be destroyed by Al Qaeda or any other foreign threat. But we are in the process of being destroyed by our domestic enemies.

We know some of their names: The Koch brothers; Richard Mellon Scaife who spent untold millions trying to destroy the Clintons; Joseph Coors, (yeah, Coors beer), who has poured much of his fortune into screwing us all; and so many others who either own banks, and/or use Wall Street scams to rape us all.

Anyone who spends just a little time and effort on Google knows who is responsible for our current economic crisis. They are tremendously wealthy people who want to own everything there is to own. And they don’t give a damn if any of the rest of us live or die.

So here’s my question. Does anyone really believe that President Obama doesn’t understand this? Why is he compromising with politicians who are owned by our domestic enemies? Why isn’t he doing everything possible to protect the American middle class? Doesn’t he “get it?” Perhaps someone can explain this to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. "It's not a game a man is supposed to grow strong in, Jonathan."
Edited on Mon Mar-07-11 12:41 PM by villager
"You can appreciate that, can't you?"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Barack Obama believes in one thing: Barack Obama. Trying to
help the poor and middle class would be going against those who are pretty powerful, and to take them on, he'd have to get his hands dirty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. the next presidential election is projected to break all spending records.
The candidate who is able to raise the most money is assured victory.

Who do you think is signing all those checks for Mr. Obama's campaign?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Uh...the guy from Fight Club??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. if tyler were writing the checks I might even vote next time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Foo Fighter Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #33
73. Hell, if Tyler were running, I'd vote for him.
"Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we haul your trash, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. Do not... fuck with us."

The WH could use a Fight Club instead of a Compromise Club In The Name of Bipartisanship, IMHO.

Tyler would definitely get my vote.


A word of warning though. If you ever eat at the WH, make sure to specify "clean food, please."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. One thing he should do: cut, cut, cut defense spending and Bush's wars.
He should immediately order that eight of our nation's aircraft carriers be parked. Why should Americans protect China's oil? Or China's one-way trade routes to America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because he's not Superman.
He doesn't have that much control over the forces that are causing these problems. A lot of the blame should be placed on members of Congress (both parties), who are taking money from wealthy corporations and are either enacting or not opposing legislation that favors the wealthy. I think Obama could and should do more to try to influence Congress, but his actual Constitutional power over it is mainly limited to the veto. He can't singlehandedly "save" us from the fuckups and negligence of Congress, no matter what he might or might not want to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. What? He's no longer Commander in Chief? He could stop...
...the wars in ONE DAY is he so chose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. oh never mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
65. Then he's pretty useless and we shouldn't waste much time worrying about him.
Or any elections, really. If elections don't work, then only revolt remains as an option, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
71. But he can cause revolutions of people all over the planet. Do I have that right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. His bosses would get mad.
Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. When you get an answer, please let us know
I am unable to understand 13-dimensional chess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. I'm sure the crotch groping at airports has a higher purpose, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
56. Me either, but what I do know is that Obama's no Bobby Fisher.
Or Boris Whatshisname Spassky (?).

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. You will get chairs thrown at you here -- But it's a very good question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Because We Haven't Got the Votes to Get ANYTHING Without Compromise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. We had the votes to get ....
....Medicare for All, but we made every compromise the Rethugs asked for, then passed HCR without a single vote from their side.

And Obama doesn't need even one vote to end the wars. He's the Commander in Chief for crying out loud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Complete bullshit, he did NOT have the votes for medicare for all.
Nice try, in a third grade, not quite there yet way.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. We Never Had 60 Votes for a Public Option in the Senate. Never.
Do you really think Lieberman would have ever voted for a public option?
He's from Connecticut. Insurance companies own him. They own the whole state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
44. not only that, the poster claims we had the votes for single payer.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
62. Since the president didn't try to get those votes, they didn't happen
The President said he would not sign a bill without a public option. He didn't mean it. He caved. Now he is just trying to get reelected, not trying to help US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #62
70. Would You Have Been Happier if He Vetoed It and We Got NOTHING?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #62
88. Doesn't matter if the votes don't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. uh, bullshit. bernie claimed there were about 5 votes in the senate. i trust bernie. do you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #43
76. ??
bernie claimed there were about 5 votes in the senate


I don't think single payer could ever have passed, but I don't think it would have done THAT badly.

Did you mean he thought it could pick up 5 *Republican* votes? That I would find hard to believe.
Which Republicans?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #18
87. We did not have the votes to get "Medicare for all".
That is a bald-faced lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
79. We had the votes
For the first two years and ended up wasting political capital on a health care plan that is pretty much universally hated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
84. Oh for pete's sake. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. Obama Doesn't See Himself as the Heroic Type
Heroes end up dead in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Uh, The USSC? Ever hear of them? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
45. FACTS?! thems fightin' woids... PUT UP YER DUKES!!!




:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #45
92. Hey Dion. You still wanna fight?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. What bullshit...
This is approaching John Birch Society-level nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. Of course he "gets it". And he has made his choice about what side he is on.
That's not at all hard to figure out. It's just a little hard for some folks to swallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. He understands fully, he's doing the job he was hired for.

Hillary or McCain would be doing more or less the same in his shoes.

Why do you think that the candidates all must pass muster with the Big Boys before the serious money flows?

The people are not so much the cause of his election but rather the object, and some people still don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. The trip to meet with Warren Buffet is in his Audacity book. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Buffet is actually a pretty good guy.
Edited on Mon Mar-07-11 04:05 PM by dawg
He's staked out positions that are a lot more liberal on economic issues than those of the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Not the point - it's easy for him to say whatever he likes while he
counts his gold. He's a product of a system in which a few hold all the wealth and everyone else subsists on crumbs. He played the game well, but whether he's a "good guy" - irrelevant imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOG PERSON Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
59. please
the man's a parasite par excellence :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #59
83. He consistently advocates for a fairer tax system.
The guy makes no bones about the fact his secretary pays a higher tax rate than he does. He doesn't think that is fair, and advocates changes to the tax code to tax capital gains in a more equitable manner to labor.

I can't fault the guy for exploiting the system the way it is. I'd do the same thing.

I actually have more respect for someone who advocates changes that would cost them money than I do for someone who would benefit from those changes personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. The Truth?
Because just like nearly all 435 of our congressmen and 100 senators, he is bought and paid for by the people that want to reduce us to slaves. Alan Grayson was one of the few that paid his own way and look what happened to him.

That's ugly but that's the truth. Reconciliation could have been used in his first 2 years to do about anything he wanted. Bush did it, used signing statements, or what ever was needed to get his way.

Remember his promise of transparency? He had the same back room meetings that we cried bloody murder about when President Cheney was in office.

Better get used to it. It's up to US. Citizens United should be an indication to even the dimmest bulb of what direction we're going in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. Because the Daley brothers are some of his best friends.
When JP Morgan and GFS are your best friends, the people seem far far away and like little ants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
31. He never stood for any of the policies that would prevent our destruction
Tear down the military industrial complex- No Obama
Strengthen social safety nets- No Obama
Remove the systemic risk from investment- No Obama
Increased progressive taxation- No Obama
Remove the Bush era rights violations- No Obama
Remove the undue influence of concentrated wealth in politics- No Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
34. When Obama leaves office in 2016, I wonder who folks will blame for all the ills then?
Its amusing to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
51. The same ones I've been blaming long before PO. n/t
Edited on Mon Mar-07-11 07:41 PM by Fire1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
35. Maybe he is not of the opinion that those individuals are trying to
"destroy" us?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. He don't have time, he's jetting around with Jeb BushCo.
Lookin' for more "Partisanship" and good will from those good hearted republican neocons and war criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
40. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
41. His charter won't allow it
The charter he signed - you know - the one that keeps him from getting JFK'd or RFK'd - only allows him to make weak, insignificant changes.

But don't worry, he's allowed to brag about his accomplishments and tell us all how better we are off now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
42. Certainly he understands it. Perhaps more now than when he
was a presidential candidate. Problem is, he's aware of alot more now than when he was a senator. Goldman Sachs spent more money on him than anybody else and they want results just like the other "contributors" on that list. He has to pay the piper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
namahage Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #42
75. Like the University of California, that outspent GS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
46. The idea that Barrack Obama, Bill Clinton, Michael Moore
Al Gore or Arianna Huffington is looking out for the little people is worse than an illusion. It is plain fantasy. These people did not get to where they are from looking out for us. They got there by looking out for themselves!!! Look how they live. Do they need all the homes they own? Cars they drive? Jets they fly? Power they wield?

Especially these last two stunts by Moore and Huffington.

I am done. I am looking out for me. I will get my hood this spring and then I will go into the world and make my mark. If I get rich enough, politics won’t matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Congrats! How long did it take you? I'm still a candidate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #46
95. Actually Michael Moore did get where he is looking out for "us"
He gained fame as an independent filmmaker documenting the destruction of his home town Flint Mi in the wake of GM layoffs. He may be a little self absorbed but his films always fall on the side of the "people".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
47. +1
Obama is not part of the solution - he is part of the problem IMO. We desperately need a Dem challenger for 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
48. I'm of the opinion that we should let the republicans destroy us...
...then maybe some of these idiots will wake the fuck up. Probably not, but you never know.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #48
68. That's my strategy for 2012.
Yellow Rubber Duckie aside- new book just came out on the subject: "Moby Duck: The True Story of 28,800 Bath Toys Lost at Sea and of the Beachcombers, Oceanographers, Environmentalists, and Fools, Including the Author, Who Went in Search of Them," by Donovan Hohn. Good reviews...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
50. If this trend isn't stopped, Walker of WI has an idea
Increased funds for pauper's burials.

That's all you can expect from these bloodsuckers, blood, toil, sweat and tears.

Meanwhile, the rich have never had it so good. A president. and Congress who's on their side and tons of investment opportunities for the latest sweatshop industry in Bangladesh.

Goddammit, SOMEBODY in America better wake up and SUPPORT what going down in Wisconsin.

It's a SYMBOLIC struggle going on down there. Of course not for the people in WI,of course, it affects them directly. But if it's lost, then it's a downhill slope from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. As Wisconsin goes, so goes the nation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. I heard a statistic last week
No president has EVER won without winning Wisconsin. Don't know if it's true or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
namahage Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #52
77. If so, then Obama cruises to victory.
In Wisconsin Obama’s Approval Soars as Scott Walker Plummets
A new Wisconsin Policy Research Institute poll released today revealed that by trying to break the public sector union in the state, Gov. Scott Walker is not only destroying his own popularity, but is making President Obama more popular, and could be handing Wisconsin to the Democrats in 2012.

<snip>

Wisconsities may share a negative perception about the direction of both their state and the country as a whole, but President Obama and Scott Walker’s approval ratings are heading in opposite directions. Wisconsin residents’ approval of the job Obama is doing as president by a 53%-42% margin. The numbers are reversed for Gov. Walker as 53% disapprove and only 43% approve of his job performance. Shockingly among those who disapprove, 45% strongly disapprove of Walker. In contrast only 26% strongly disapprove of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
53. He wants us all to die. He personally threatened my
ailing grandma. He threatened to hit her with a "Death Panel".

I was there. I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. He kicked my puppy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
55. Did he campaign on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOG PERSON Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. nope
as a matter of fact, i remember in several of his stump speeches throughout 2008, obama emphatically declared he would do everything in his power to prevent our *physical destruction* but anything beyond that would be us getting sort of greedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #55
80. Do you have to campaign on being a decent human being for it to be expected? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fittosurvive Donating Member (538 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
57. Because he has neither the power, nor the plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
western mass Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
58. Obama is not on your side.
At this point, anybody who doesn't understand this is doing their best to try to NOT understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mochajava666 Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Very well said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. That I have learned the hard way.
I was an eager supporter. I worked for his election and sent money. But none of us can ante up the money which GE, GM, Microsft, etc, can contribute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
66. Because he can't
The big money men won't tolerate it, and they ate the ones who are running the show, not the government, it's become a puppet and a rather transparent one at that .

The fact is, nobody in Washington can prevent our destruction, only we can and we won't quit fighting among ourselves long enough to do what needs to be done. Although I doubt we have the stomach for what really needs to be done. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
67. This plane is gonna crash. It can't fly no more.
The only question is how hard and where.

I'm still glad Bush or McCain are not in the pilot's seat.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
69. Because the BushCo cronies on the Supreme Court rigged the system w/Citizens United.
Edited on Mon Mar-07-11 11:02 PM by ClarkUSA
Because Americans were so stupid as to vote in a Teabagger House.

Because Congress is a co-equal branch of government that makes the laws in America and everything has to go through the Teabagger House first (see present budget battle).

Because President Obama doesn't have a magic wand to make all of the above go away so he can rule as a left-wing dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
72. The answer is simple and obvious!
He wants to be reelected! Look at how his pole numbers jumped after he passed the tax cuts. He doesn't like the things he has to vote for and neither do I but if he doesn't a Rethug will be elected and that will be even worse! I just hope that after he's elected and he'll do the right thing and change some of the policies he was forced to sign. I wish more people could understand this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
74. WE THE PEOPLE means SHIT now
Obama is aiding and abetting those criminals and has been since day one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #74
82. News flash. It hasn't meant anything in quite some time. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
78. Bush was a dolt. Omama is 100% responsible however
He knows the full ramifications of this delay and resultant demise. He's brilliant and as charming as Ted Bundy. He is definitely not our friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
81. The House control the budget. Obama can only do Vetos now. Economically his hands are tied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
85. Because he works for them. This one is up to us. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteProgressive Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
86. That is why we need to immediately stop the wars!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
89. Because the other two Branches of government overruled him.
They are bent on destruction, and he can't stop that. I'm not sure how badly he wants to, anyway--hard to tell from out here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. Did those 2 other branches force him to sign the EO for indefinite detention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #91
96. There is no point in nickel-and-diming me with every terrible decision the president's made.
The OP begged the question, postulating that the president can prevent collapse. I think that that has never been true.

The inertial of the Legislative and Judicial Branches means that no one person, however charismatic or progressive, could undo enough of the suck to save us all--and as I said, I'm not sure the president feels much urgency in the matter. I see him as only a little more progressive than the average Congresscritter or justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
90. Wow. I didn't expect so many responses.
There were so many deleted sub-threads here which indicate to me that many people are: angry/fed up with hypocrisy/sick of stupidity/stupid/just plain tired of being had/or have just been ground into the dust from being screwed over again and again.

No one who posted here can claim to be "right" or "wrong." We are merely posting our opinions that are occasionally supported by some linked-to "facts."

But there really is a bottom line. We are living in a country that was once great and is now sinking into the sands of history.

It is with great sadness that I believe that we shall never again be a beacon of hope to the world. This situation did not come about because of some external "evil" that destroyed us. We did it all by ourselves. We let our domestic enemies run amok. And we have no one to blame but ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
93. Why keep asking "why"?
Just accept him for what he is. I'm taking that approach to the whole Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
94. He's rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC