Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reason No. 8,352 why DOMA must go: The "gay tax"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 03:13 PM
Original message
Reason No. 8,352 why DOMA must go: The "gay tax"
http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/blog/?p=8745

The letter from Yale was dated December 22. The employee opened it on Christmas Day. The phrase “lump of coal” comes to mind.

The letter informed the employee, and about 60 others with same-sex spouses, of a tax mistake. The employee owed thousands of dollars in 2010 federal taxes that the university had failed to withhold.

Yale would pay the taxes, then recoup the money during the first three months of 2011. Paired with the gay employees’ newly corrected — and higher than expected — 2011 tax withholding, that would result in significantly smaller paychecks....

The error arose because the employees cover their same-sex spouses through their Yale health insurance. Under Connecticut law, employer-provided health insurance for a gay spouse is a tax-free benefit — just as it is for hetero couples. But the federal government doesn’t recognize gay marriages or civil unions, so employees are taxed on the value of their spouses’ health care.


:grr: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R.
How many more reasons are we going to need?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMera Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r. for exposure. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Several years back a fundamentalist acquaintance of mine
said that we can't allow gay marriage because all those extra spouses will be too much of a drain on things like social security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Mmmm-kay. So what would stop people from doing what they did in the '50s?
A gay male couple and a lesbian couple would "trade places", so to speak, to provide the requisite gender mix for a legal ceremony -- and all those juicy benefits. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Interesting. I never heard of that happening
which mainly indicates there's a lot I don't know about all sorts of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC