Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Most of the releases have been controlled to relief the pressure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:16 PM
Original message
Most of the releases have been controlled to relief the pressure
interesting choice of words right now at CNN... so if they had a non controlled release can we now call it a leak? Or we will continue to be told that nothing to see here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Or, some of the releases have been controlled to
do other things (not sure what, but linguistically, that's an alternate interpretation).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was wondering about that. If having a potential meltdown I can see pressure, but
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 07:20 PM by RKP5637
if you have a meltdown starting I don't see how releasing pressure stops that. Just guessing here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Releasing pressure will hopefully prevent an explosion
Like the one that happened in reactor 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They did release pressure at reactor 1 as well but there was an explosion anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes there was and they're very luck the metal containment housing
remained intact. I fail to see your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. We do not know if it remained intact
Engineers were not able to even get to the core today to see whether a meltdown was taking place. They detected radioactive cesium and iodine in the air on Saturday night which made them believe a meltdown is taking place.

Also I read some place else that they have been having difficulties pumping sea water into the casing and there may be a leak some place that is causing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Last I heard the core was completely submerged with seawater n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. There is a lot of conflicting news
Facts are they have detected radioactive cesium and iodine in the air Saturday night which is indicative of a meltdown taking place. Then you have the Japanese ambassador claiming no such thing has happened. Even though the director of their Nuclear agency says it has.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. You got the patience of a saint
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. That there is that much pressure and hydrogen present is a clue of how close a call is is/was
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I think is is more appropriate than was still
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Hard to tell which is why I used both tenses...
Even if the serious danger is passed, it is still going to be a helluva mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. So are they releasing weapons's grade plutonium into the air?
Reactor 3 uses MOX...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Oh just a little salt to season the soup
:hi:

<-------- Gallows humor, fully
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. No, that would only be released if a fullblown meltdown occurred
Not from releasing steam to relieve pressure. That's my understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is all very confusing. I was gone for fours hours this afternoon
and the stories are more convoluted on my return than before I left.

In response to your OP, I don't understand why a controlled release seems to be ok....from what I've been hearing a non controlled release is partial melting but not a full fledged meltdown!?!?

Something else I don't understand is why NOW are they using salt water to cool the reactor(s)? This morning it seemed, according to reports I heard, water must have been hard to get, so, why didn't they use salt water then? Maybe they could have avoided the explosion at Fukushima No. 1. When I then heard that salt water will ruin the reactor I had an "a ha" moment. If they waited to use salt water just to save the reactor, I will be very upset. I'm sure they're worried about that. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. We have a lot of conflicting info
but the controlled release is a faustian choice to avoid the pressure going boom.

As to sea water, the reactor is not coming back once they get this under control

But the choice of words was interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC