Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It is safe to build a nuklear plant here!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:39 PM
Original message
It is safe to build a nuklear plant here!
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 11:40 PM by DainBramaged





Remember these photos when a Puke rolls his eyes up inside his head over nuklear power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I live at the base of a dormant volcano
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 11:58 PM by Abq_Sarah
It could conceivably come roaring back to life. Maybe I should move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That your choice.
And besides, there is no where on this earth that you or anyone else can escape from mother nature. Mother nature is one reason things evolve and adapt the way they do. Try adapting to radiation poisoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The wonderful thing about the human race
Is that we progress and evolve. Imagine if we'd canceled the space program after Apollo 1. Or if we stopped constructing buildings after the first earthquake took out the first structure.

We take risks and that's why we continue to advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. How rediculous to try and comprare constructing buildings
or the space program to nuclear plants and radiation poisoning. When a nuke goes it potentially affects millions of people for generations.
Part of evolving also includes learning to differentiate between what is the smart way to benefit humanity without destroying it.

Forgive me for saying so but your comparison is just plain dumb!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well, I think it's dumb to take extreme examples
And form public policy around them. If Japan were having 8.9+ earthquakes every decade, they probably wouldn't have built the damned plants. It's like saying it's too dangerous to allow New Orleans to exist because there is the possibility that another Cat 5 hurricane will strike the city in the next thousand years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Considering the activity of this living planet
It's ignorant to imagine that a nuke plant anywhere on earth would be all-safe. By your own observations and acknowledgment of just how hostile planet earth is it surprises me that you are a nuke supporter.

Things that make me go.... hmmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess you weren't paying attention
When the pro-nukers were insisting on the numerous layers of fail-safe measures nukes plants have. The chances of anything really bad happening are nearly impossible. Why doesn't everyone take them at their word and believe them :shrug:

:sarcasm:

Yea and "WE" (anti's) are the idiots :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ask Yourself These Questions
How many nuclear plants are located near all the West Coast fault lines?

What is their Richter scale capacity to resist damage? (I think I read that the Japan reactors were proofed to 8.0 only, but it's been a blur the last couple days)

If the foremost experts on earthquake preparedness are OUT OF CONTROL and near a possible meltdown of reactors with 100 times the power capacity of Chernobyl, how prepared do you think the bankrupt state of California is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. the big 4 sources of energy
Edited on Sun Mar-13-11 12:15 AM by TheWebHead
all have inherent risks, and DU alternates in bitching about all four with varying degrees of intensity at various points when something goes wrong. of course they bitch sitting in their heated homes, logged into their electrically powered computers while watching their TVs and cooking their food, that is when they aren't driving their cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC