|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Demonaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:21 AM Original message |
So, now that they're pumping in seawater in to these reactors, what happens to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
1. They turn into beautiful butterflys..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. All of the above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
3. They use a heat exchanger. The sea water does not come in contact with the radioactive materials. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:25 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Nonsense n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Go look up heat exchangers. That's how reactors are cooled. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:34 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. That's how they're USUALLY cooled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Do you know the difference between a BWR and a PWR? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:41 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Actually both types have heat exchangers. Look at a diagram (of either type) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. regardless, it's exchanges on DU such as this that can be very informative. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:59 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. They are talking about COOLING THE REACTORS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. Here is a really simple diagram of a PWR like the reactor at Three Mile Island... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:25 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. There is a heat exchanger in both diagrams. You obviously wouldn't know what a heat exchanger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Yes, only where the seawater would usually come in and out of a plant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Yeah, Whatever Chicken Little. Let me know when you finish your Wikipedia Engineering Degree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:54 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. I'm not sure if you know as much as you think you know.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. So you believe no seawater is coming in contact with the rods? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
35. With the actual rods? No I don't think that. Because I have more then a wikipedia knowledge of how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Just to clarify: You believe that in Reactors 1 & 3, no seawater is in contact with the fuel rods... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:36 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. That is my position. I also don't think you know where the fuel rods are located. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:47 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. In the reactor vessel and in the spent fuel pools. The ones that they are trying to cool.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:56 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Wow that was informative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. So much disinformation, so little time. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
25. Then what's the purpose of adding Boron to the sea water? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:24 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Of course it is, or else they wouldn't be doing that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:41 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. They are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokerfan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Tokyo Electric is also saying that #3 may be leaking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
5. The seawater becomes high-level radwaste that needs to be dealt with in the future |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Nope... it becomes very low-level radioactive waste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. I think, like the steam, it's low level if the integrity of the fuel rods hasn't been compromised. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
41. I agree that that's relevant, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:25 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. leaking out or boiling off? The later is to be expected, the former is worrisome. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Tritium isn't high level waste. It is a weak alpha emitter with almost no energy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:31 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. You're making an assumption that the water isn't coming directly into contact with core material |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Even if that did happen (which there is nothing to indicate core has breached) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:41 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. So tritium is the only problem, and no iodine and cesium? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:42 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Haven't they already detected both products outside of the whole core? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-15-11 09:29 AM Response to Reply #31 |
46. Looks like it's not closed any more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
7. The seawater is corrosive and it is likely that using it will render whatever it comes ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ensho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. yes they will have to replace just about everything after using salt water |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:38 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. They won't replace anything. These reactors stopped being commercial entities the second |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
13. Simple answer: radioactive steam. Complex answer .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yawnmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
23. We'll never be able to drink it. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
24. I have no idea, but whatever you do, don't get panicky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kennah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
39. If seawater isn't coming into direct contact with rods then why is boron also being used? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
40. I believe it will go into the same ponds that the fresh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
43. The seawater which becomes is contaminated is the source of the radioactive steam being released. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vicarofrevelwood (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-15-11 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
47. Radio active steam of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC