Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did You Know That Rancho Seco (NorCal) Had The 3rd Worst Nuclear Accident In The U.S. ???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 08:30 PM
Original message
Did You Know That Rancho Seco (NorCal) Had The 3rd Worst Nuclear Accident In The U.S. ???
Edited on Tue Mar-15-11 08:32 PM by WillyT
On 20 March 1978 a failure of power supply for the plant's non-nuclear instrumentation system led to steam generator dryout. (ref NRC LER 312/78-001). In an on-going study of "precursors" that could lead to a nuclear disaster if additional failures were to have occurred,<1> in 2005 the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission concluded that this event at Rancho Seco was the third most serious safety-related occurrence in the United States<2> (Behind the Three Mile Island accident and the cable tray fire at Browns Ferry).


Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rancho_Seco_Nuclear_Generating_Station

And... From 1986...

We Almost Lost Shasta Watershed
Rancho Seco Near-Disaster Covered Up by Utility

<snip>

On December 26th, 1985 at 4:17 A.M., the Rancho Seco reactor located southeast of Sacramento came extremely close to a meltdown. The reactor with a hundred accidents under its belt (twice the average for reactors its age) and three of the most serious cooldowns in the industry has created a political and economic crisis for the Sacramento Municipal Utility Commission (SMUD) that may lead to the permanent shutdown of the reactor or even bankruptcy of the utility. It has been shutdown since the accident, and only has a 40% chance of coming back on line by June 1987. The accident did not come to the public's attention until after the Chernobyl disaster. What's most chilling however, is the fact that the public never learned just how serious the accident was.

In piecing together the events from the NRC's own investigation, it becomes clear that the event was far more serious than a mere mechanical foul-up, as claimed by SMUD. The accident, caused by a loose wire, cut off power to the Integrated Control System (ICS) for 26 minutes. The ICS is the computer system that regulates the temperature of the reactor and the steam system to the turbine generator. In other words, the operators lost control of the reactor from the control room.

Workers were dispatched to various parts of the facility in attempts to head off a loss of coolant accident (LOCA). LOCA's are the dreaded scenario almost sure to lead to a meltdown. Two of the workers were contaminated in their attempt to reach critical valves.

Operators were successfull at stopping the LOCA but did not have accurate preocedures for maintaining control of the reactor from outside the control room. As a result, the reactor vessel cooled down to quickly. When this occurs, the 8 inch thick walls of the reactor may shatter, crack or become embrittled reducing the usable lifetime for the unit. During the accident the following serious events ocurred:

<snip>

More: http://www.energy-net.org/01NUKE/RSECO85.HTM

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Didn't Know Until Saturday... And I Live Here...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC